Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,498 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 260,793
Pageviews Today: 416,628Threads Today: 133Posts Today: 2,145
05:19 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
lol you actually did not answer my question! I'm not saying I believe her or not, frankly I could care less. I just find it ("it" being Nancy and her theories) an interesting read from time to time but I laugh at your failed attempt to bring forth some kind of evidence.

In any debate both sides should be able to represent their position with some sort of evidence. In a court of law Nancy's argument may be considered to be true more than your's as she can actually bring some stuff to the table. Just simply saying (in this hypothetical court of law example) that everything she is saying is total B.S without any cold hard facts that totally contradict her evidence would not really help you win the case.

And honestly I could care less about the 2003 "white lie" thing... unfortunately that is the only cold hard fact that you can talk about...and by you I don't mean the whole debunker community, but you Lone Ranger.

As for the rest of the debunker community some of them actually have some REALLY good arguments against Nancy which AGAIN I find to be a good read.

And that wasn't a rant but just my observations :)

So here's a start for you to bring some "evidence" to the table. Tell us one example, besides the 2003 "white lie", when Nancy's track record faltered. To do this you have to post the original post from ZetaTalk and then a post from a major news website/source with the story of that event that either has a different date for the event than Nancy's date or some fact that completely contradicts Nancy's prediction.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP