And unlike some debunkers and some Nancy followers I will admit that I can come up with no such evidence myself as I only from time to time read ZetaTalk because it's an interesting read.

Really what pisses me off is when people argue their position with no evidence whatsoever. And Nancy has some evidence while Lone Ranger never actually used any. Well in the past our he showed some, I guess you can call it, circumstantial evidence pointing to the many GOOD debunking posts (not directly of course, as in he gave no links but it's definitely not hard to find.)



You yourself state that you cannot find any evidence that Nancy has used, yet in the very next paragraph, you state that Nancy has used evidence.

Which is it?