So Clare can't pretend she doesn't remember this:

As to the final point, it was my own way to express spinning on its own axis in a north-south self-referential way, as the Earth does.
Quoting: mclarek 971744


Menow: No, that can't be it, since you went on to clarify that a "self-axis spinning" body is also "(not having an orbit)", which Earth certainly does. Care to try again?


This, the moon does not do. It has a ROTATION but not a spin on its own axis.
Quoting: mclarek 971744


Menow: Wrong. The Moon DOES spin on its own axis! Why would you think it does not? What motions would the moon display if Earth(and even Sun) suddenly went missing?


I already said several times the Moon rottes. I was presenting how Nancy could be unclear on that and in the CONTEXT try to say something about how we woudn't fly off any more than if the moon stopped, someone would fly off it. THat was her point the day I watched the exchange on ZT about it. It was a misunderstanding by Nancy of the rotation AND a misunderstanding by the questioners of her main point, which was that the Moon faces us, and does not rotate in our view in the key way we do, like spin on an axis in relation to us.

Unimportant issue here. Why pick on this point? Just to say she's stupid and so on?