Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,211 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,146,698
Pageviews Today: 1,914,957Threads Today: 791Posts Today: 13,758
06:35 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Poster Handle George B
Post Content
Come on guys, don't be so hard on George. He's being civil
after all.

George, it would be a good idea to start a separate thread and
post the link here so anyone interested can go to it.

I will post no more here about Chemtrails . . . I was originally responding to Menow . . . I await his response to my challenge.


Old, tired, regurgitated garbage... not worthy of response.

So you don't think you can defend you position against a jury of your selection with rules of your choice? I personally think it would be entertaining and worthwhile because there is a limit to the duration of the argument and there is a judgment made by independent minds as to the strength of the evidence and power of the presentation. Sorry you refuse!


Start yet another chemtrail thread and see if you can get anyone to wade through that same old inane crapola with you... AGAIN!

Good luck with that.
 Quoting: Menow 441617


The difference my friend would be that there would be a limitation of time, an endpoint and judgment (temporary as it would be). We could use this method to go through that list you or someone gave Clare. Rational debate versus Ranting! I would be willing to take either side of a debate except for the one on Chemtrails. I would be willing to take Nancy's position if that would make you feel better. I in no way wish to embarrass you or myself; I just think this format could be a gas! Think about it!
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP