OF COURSE you could be fooled to thinking there was a fake, if it was a weird co-incidence on one photo.
This is not what we have here. We have many different people with same-faced photos, and some (like Wanio) multiple (6) photos of the same face ...
Plus different people/faces with almost the same face, and only a few changes, plus airbrushing in some.
The case is clear, for some of these photos and for the total to be suspect.
If we could have a court case (a real one without interference), we could determine if a few co-incidences happened.
All the rest is a sloppy paper trail: no SSDI records for many -- though they could add them now -- and some tear-jerk stories. In real life, these might be real stories.
For your hypothesis to be true, the photos -- some of them clearly faked right off the bat knowable, and others visible as fakes once you look (with still others inconclusive yet) -- so again,
for your hypothesis to be true, specific family claimants are carrying fake photos. Why?For this hypothesis to be true, it was part of a plan, and done as many intelligence ops are done. And here, the reason for the fakes doesn't leave a question of why. The fakes are
handled for what they are.
Look at Wanio. Then go 1/2 way down to the FDNY comparisons. Then go back to the others in the middle: SOME of them are more subtle; your eye must be careful on some of them to detect it. So start with the obvious ones and work forward.
[
link to septemberclues.info]