Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

At the risk of taking this thread back on topic, have you guys seen the relaunch status of the Zetasquawk page?Hilarious. Looks like the government is getting ready to launch a new campaign against Nancy. ROFLMAO.
[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

So you're saying because its launch is delayed, it's not a gov't site?

Back to non-Clare business.

Ningcompoop watch:

When people finally ask reasonable questions, Nancy offers obvious bullshit, but they never challenge her on it. Example:

Question: Also when Planet X arrives, and since it generates its own heat, would it's 'yearly' passage by the sun mean it's summer time on planet x? How hot would it be?

Answer: And where things heat up during their passage by our Sun, it is a water planet and very shrouded so does not get to a boil during the passage.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

But from that link, in direct reference to the question, is:

The passage through the Solar System is quick, occurring in a few short months [Note: see 2003 date explanation], so the combined warming from the Sun as well as the interior of the 12th Planet scarcely has a chance to begin before it ends. What warming that does occur simply results in more active winds.

The cited Zetatalk actually shows the fallacy of Nancy's claim that PX could hover near the Sun for 7 years with a living population on it. But will anyone at the Ning challenge the contradiction? Of course not.

Second, these are "family members" and in a memorial non-commented-upon bio, from 2003-2009 (and only 1 in that whole period), these family members would most likely be plants. Hey, look at the faces in the portrait the old people ("grandparents") are holding: pasted faces. Can't you tell?

Back to non-Clare business.

Ningcompoop watch:

When people finally ask reasonable questions, Nancy offers obvious bullshit, but they never challenge her on it. Example:

Question: Also when Planet X arrives, and since it generates its own heat, would it's 'yearly' passage by the sun mean it's summer time on planet x? How hot would it be?

Answer: And where things heat up during their passage by our Sun, it is a water planet and very shrouded so does not get to a boil during the passage.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

But from that link, in direct reference to the question, is:

The passage through the Solar System is quick, occurring in a few short months [Note: see 2003 date explanation], so the combined warming from the Sun as well as the interior of the 12th Planet scarcely has a chance to begin before it ends. What warming that does occur simply results in more active winds.

The cited Zetatalk actually shows the fallacy of Nancy's claim that PX could hover near the Sun for 7 years with a living population on it. But will anyone at the Ning challenge the contradiction? Of course not.

That's funny. I set a trap for her and made up a ludicrous story about the moon being way off. She answered that PX has been affecting the moon since 04. I said I only just noticed it, that before now the moon was hanging out in my bedroom window EVERY NIGHT (lol) for as long as I've lived here, but now I only see it in the bathroom, and I asked her why it hasn't moved around until now. The answer was that PX is still in it's "slow creep" past the sun. She can't keep her own bullshit straight and none of the ningcompoops dare point out these abundant self contradictions. It's pretty funny!

that fake family in the news article who never put up a message on the memorial page in all those years -- till now, lol).



[link to www.legacy.com]

code writing.

Let's say (I'm making this one up as an example:

MARC CoLLIns
LYNN M. ARCher
ARroio LIMA [LI-MA}

and so on.

Second, these are "family members" and in a memorial non-commented-upon bio, from 2003-2009 (and only 1 in that whole period), these family members would most likely be plants. Hey, look at the faces in the portrait the old people ("grandparents") are holding: pasted faces. Can't you tell?



You are delusional or lying outright!

There is ABSOLUTELY nothing questionable about that photo…nothing that I could find on the surface or at the pixel level!

I’m somewhat embarrassed to say that I spent 3 years in my younger days working as a lab manager for a Photography Company. I spent about 5 hours a day working with Photoshop. We cleaned up acne on senior portraits…omitted “the finger” from group yearbook photos, you name it. You are wrong and it is either due to delusion or outright deceit. The only thing I noticed about that photo was that the parents were not smiling and being a parent myself, I think I know why. I have no respect for you and you deserve none.

Second, these are "family members" and in a memorial non-commented-upon bio, from 2003-2009 (and only 1 in that whole period), these family members would most likely be plants. Hey, look at the faces in the portrait the old people ("grandparents") are holding: pasted faces. Can't you tell?



You are delusional or lying outright!

There is ABSOLUTELY nothing questionable about that photo…nothing that I could find on the surface or at the pixel level!

I’m somewhat embarrassed to say that I spent 3 years in my younger days working as a lab manager for a Photography Company. I spent about 5 hours a day working with Photoshop. We cleaned up acne on senior portraits…omitted “the finger” from group yearbook photos, you name it. You are wrong and it is either due to delusion or outright deceit. The only thing I noticed about that photo was that the parents were not smiling and being a parent myself, I think I know why. I have no respect for you and you deserve none.

Actually, that photo is so small (in our view) which they're holding you and I can't tell for certain. I'll gant you that much.

They do have perfect face-forward faces though. They could be models instead.

But the point is the men have to be fake. The shills watch the researcher sites -- and realized it DID sound ridiculous for 2 execs to have 1 mention from a Desiree frend, each. (Plus it showed from 2003.)

....................

Now move to the close-up photos. Have a look at those. Freeze faces over and over and over and over.

Some are iffy (perhaps real), but some cannot be and there are too many overall with no significant difference in them.

The rest are morph faces (go to black-white FDNY).

By the way, there was only 1 photo each for the Colaio brothers and so nothing to compare; and the faces for them seem fine. They're not up now, though.

The 2009 memorial site screen shot (from [link to septemberclues.info] and the page now without photos for them at [link to www.legacy.com] .

Don't get stuck on the Colaio front-forward small-image portrait in grandparents' hands. You can't see the faces in the portrait well either! I can tell it's likely with the front-forward faces for the brothers, they were stiff paste-ins like the rest. They could have been models. But their id. makes no sense -- like hundreds of others.

The cited Zetatalk actually shows the fallacy of Nancy's claim that PX could hover near the Sun for 7 years with a living population on it. But will anyone at the Ning challenge the contradiction? Of course not.

code writing.

Let's say (I'm making this one up as an example):

MARC CoLLIns
LYNN M. ARCher
ARroio LIMA [LI-MA}

and so on.

The cited Zetatalk actually shows the fallacy of Nancy's claim that PX could hover near the Sun for 7 years with a living population on it. But will anyone at the Ning challenge the contradiction? Of course not.

There are hundreds of holes and contradictions in ZetaTalk. But, as you said, none of her brain dead followers question her on it. They simply believe whatever she tells them. If she ever does call for them to "drink the Kool Aid"...they'll happily do it.

Where is Returner?

"Spooking" about? Creaking around the corners?

:)

Here's an example of names (p. 32 of [link to septemberclues.info] where the work is on-going but they've made some headway with what was done):

Ana M. Cen]teno
Denise Crant
Mary D'Antonio
Elizabeth Ann Darling
Elena Ledesma
Luis Jimenez Jr.
William Lum Jr.
Arthur Warren Scullin

and another from a different section of the databank (p. 31 of [link to septemberclues.info] ):

Rajesh Khandelwal
Richard J. Klares
Dorota Kopiczko
Hamidou S. Larry
Klaus Sprockamp

And on it goes.

Note: the names in the databank are NOT all in alphabetical order. The code had to be extracted (as I said).

And when you do find a bunch, they have same-morph syllables.

THE WHOLE THING FOR 9/11 IS IRREGULAR: the photos, the names, the "memorial tributes", etc. HIGHLY irregular.

And we already have the absolute proof of video fakery in NYC: parallax impossiblities.

So, the rest is just figuring out how they did it all exactly. And that's coming along.

Returner had an accident Saturday afternoon, and is still in a fair degree of pain. Just got in to work to do some things that must be done injuries or no. Head is still pretty fuzzy so you'll all forgive me if I'm not up to my usual rate of posting.

Returner had an accident Saturday afternoon, and is still in a fair degree of pain. Just got in to work to do some things that must be done injuries or no. Head is still pretty fuzzy so you'll all forgive me if I'm not up to my usual rate of posting.

Where is Returner?

"Spooking" about? Creaking around the corners?

:)


Hey... I thought *I* was your special one... Now you like HIS attentive abuse better than mine? Slut.

Returner had an accident Saturday afternoon, and is still in a fair degree of pain. Just got in to work to do some things that must be done injuries or no. Head is still pretty fuzzy so you'll all forgive me if I'm not up to my usual rate of posting.



Sorry to hear that, palomine!

Get well soon, Returner!

Will live. Result of my own stupidity. No broken bones, no internal vleeding aside from deep-tissue bruising.

In the battle of Man VS Tractor, man didn't so so well this time.

Will live. Result of my own stupidity. No broken bones, no internal vleeding aside from deep-tissue bruising.

In the battle of Man VS Tractor, man didn't so so well this time.

Where is Returner?

"Spooking" about? Creaking around the corners?

:)


Hey... I thought *I* was your special one... Now you like HIS attentive abuse better than mine? Slut.

Oh you are, Menow. You are. If you want to be.

You never showed any interest, so how was I to know? In fact, you are filled with invective. How smart is that?

Of course, you'll say you were kidding anyway -- and maybe you are -- just baiting me. No?

Hey, dude -- if you do think I have a mind and heart after all, even with all you've said here against me I still offer you --

I HATE it when there is vleeding!

You never showed a fur-hat pic before. Now I'm hooked.