Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,547 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 304,383
Pageviews Today: 495,863Threads Today: 166Posts Today: 2,833
07:03 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Poster Handle mclarek
Post Content
Second, these are "family members" and in a memorial non-commented-upon bio, from 2003-2009 (and only 1 in that whole period), these family members would most likely be plants. Hey, look at the faces in the portrait the old people ("grandparents") are holding: pasted faces. Can't you tell?



You are delusional or lying outright!

There is ABSOLUTELY nothing questionable about that photo…nothing that I could find on the surface or at the pixel level!

I’m somewhat embarrassed to say that I spent 3 years in my younger days working as a lab manager for a Photography Company. I spent about 5 hours a day working with Photoshop. We cleaned up acne on senior portraits…omitted “the finger” from group yearbook photos, you name it. You are wrong and it is either due to delusion or outright deceit. The only thing I noticed about that photo was that the parents were not smiling and being a parent myself, I think I know why. I have no respect for you and you deserve none.
 Quoting: Setheory 869850

By the way, Sethory, I was referring to the weird heads (it seems) on the photo IN the photo.


But it doesn't matter that we can't see it clearly in the photo: these identities are fake, as known from two other things:

a) their comment from 1 friend in 2003 (until now, when they've back-dated the comments)

b) AND as known from the context -- i.e., the other "characters" of 9/11 victims are clearly fraudulent, mostly, from their photos over and over and over -- and the way their names bunch with syllable replication over and over and over and over and over ...

Plus we already have fake LAWS OF OPTICS in the NYC vids to start us looking. They don't prove there were no (or few deaths) but they certainly do pull down any charade that there was, if you look further, and then -- omg! there are tons of other improbabilities to the point of near-impossibility.

So ... welcome to British-Isr.-US intelligence ops.

They did this for the cover-up of JFK, too. Researchers notices a high irregularity or mutually exclusive problem in two pieces of evidence, including photos. Then came out with a "newly found" photo (or whatever) to "explain" the irregularity in the other photo, but then the new one had a new problem relating to the other two, or some 4th. :)

Really enterprising researchers should go out and interview all these people, "live" and "deceased" ... to find out which ones are real and what they have to say.

:)
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP