|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
mclarek |
|
Post Content
|
Hey, if you believe that, I have a centred tower with one behind it, which as you move around them doesn't begin to be eclipsed by the front one ... Nor should it be, in fact it should do just the opposite since you're moving around it to the left and the tower was being eclipsed on its right side by the foreground tower. Indeed, it does just the opposite and when you look at in stereo, voila, 3d towers with the foreground one in the foreground, background one in the background, and background bridge way the hell in the background... [ link to i319.photobucket.com] [ link to i319.photobucket.com] In nature, dear, either you see more of the background tower and less of the visible opposite side of the front one, or you see less of the back tower and more of the front tower's opposite side. In this photo, if we're moving to the left, we will see more of the tower behind (fine: we do) but we will ALSO SEE LESS of the opposite side of the front tower: the shadow side.And by the way, there's NO change in the video I was pointing out originally. The bridge moves and -- though Commentator doesn't understand it, which at least you sort of get here -- the towers DO NOT move relative to each other at all in the other video.Here they do, but one side is flubbed. :)
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
