Now, what do you think of those (non-putative PX) NASA image problems. Are they controlling most images and sometimes getting the recreation wrong? Transmission errors wouldn't move whole planets only, and move them without edges (Venus), or make whole sections smudge out a planet, and looks like some background with it (Saturn). And there's cut-and-paste in some.
Maybe PX is there and our nice telescopes confuse it with a flare, but Nasa's covering it up?
Or maybe there are spy satellites going near and they are cutting planets out to cover. Very strange.
You question on satellite imaging is totally out of my league . . . I listen to both sides and beyond common sense I don't have a clue. Is there a coverup? I don't know.
Quoting: George BIt IS weird. And Saturn-
nada- Saturn.
and Venus-
moved Venus relative to edge- Venus.
So, we're down to unknowns:
if the Zeta-Nancy people hoaxed this ...
of if NASA had a glitch then what kind? ...
NASA is faking something (again -- lol) ...
And if the last, then what to cover up?
PX? Satellites? UFOs? What?
Someone MADE these images in layers, to get Venus moving with no other changes in the background, it seems to me. If we could analyze the images more in depth, maybe we'd find smudge lay-in of the area instead.
And why?
xo
Re. "again" on Nasa fakes ... even if you don't see that a flap can't be up in a Photo and down in a TV feed of the same instant (Apollo 11) ... at least maybe you know of what I posted a while back on the climategate equations that NASA was busted for absolutely -- though few notice these things outside the special interest group. I post these here not to change the thread but back up my charge again re. NASA -- like any organization it can be used for ill:
Tiny intro blurb: [
link to climaterealists.com]
Actual document article: [
link to climaterealists.com]
