When is there enough evidence for you, idiot?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 986902What evidence? Evidence that Beamer and Wainio are okay? Nada -- newspapers, etc., are sufficient when there's fakery involved; and in an intelligence op situation the high likelihood of finding fakes should increase your willingness to assess fakery.
Anyway, in that case you need to hypothesize why a real family would have fake photos up. If they do, they are being set up or are fakes themselves, even if their name is Wainio or Beamer (to cover for a fake kid). These become real POSSIBILITIES.
Only a DA would be likely to settle it in EACH INSTANCE, but overall: 100 problematic photo sets or so, plus coding problems and memorial problems.
And no, Sept. Clues is not likely the fakes: they compiled on-going tracking of the videos all along, and updated their info as the media changed THEIR OWN versions: the media now have taken out a lot of the original video clips. Some are only preserved in the discussion from some years back, by Sept. Clues and others.
Yes, there can be fakes AMONG THE FAKERY TRACERS; but these are hotly debated and exposed. No-one has claimed these photos are not from memorial sites originally.
You've been mishandling Liz Wainio and you don't even know how to spell her name, brute. And tell me exactly how is her name a fake; how does her name prove that she couldn't have existed? What is it with your idiotic claim that some names prove they must be fakes?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 986902You are not a wholistic thinker, clearly. The issue is we have layers of fakery and evidence on how they did it ...
All layers have a different problem set; and this is in fact what you find, in SPADES (i.e., in large number!).
V- and Isr- and Jsuet-
Everything after the ":" was incomprehensible to me, but English is not my mother tongue so I don't know all its refinement.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 986902No problem. Vatican, Israel, Jesuit.
But the other thing is true. People do indeed search with word combinations stuff that they're after, with Google for example. And so you don't want people doing searches with those words being directed here, to your silly posts? Fine.
I find it odd, however, that you post your name and pics here for anyone's exploitation.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 986902Originally, I came on to Jim's show. Most people come on with real names. I was used to that and didn't think to have mine removed. I suppose I could have, but at the time I didn't think about that -- I knew a lot but was not careful (or paranoid) for myself, figuring anyone serious would have had my i.d. from the e-mails Jim and I exchanged for a long time before. Now I would be more careful, but the cat's out of the bag anyway.
Then Returner asked for the photos; that was not worth hiding because I am searchable to any spook already by my name's being up on Jim's site already; an implication of what someone here pointed out about the unwiseness of having used my name with Jim at all.
It shows familiarity with the totality of the groups, not with only one line of thinking.
What the fuck are you talking about here. Beats me.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 986902I was saying that mentioning one word or other would not be caught as important; it looks for combinations.
Clare, you are being abusive in so many ways. You must be some kind of a sadist. Do men actually like that trait in you? You do want these men here and everyone to LIKE you, don't you Clare, dear, honey, sweetheart?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 986902Whaaaaaa....t?
Astronut was proving you wrong with your "moving bridges", and you're the one who just don't get it but you insulted him instead. You don't do any research before you make your claims. You want all the others do the work for you. You like to enslave people, ms domina?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 986902Astronut proved nothing about the bridge.
As to the rest in this section ... ?!?!
:-/
I will handle the bridge issues another time. I am exhausted. Bye.
