|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
mclarek |
|
Post Content
|
As to tilting, I know it wouldn't work to save us from all the effects -- but it WOULD show some of the faraway stars okay.
Absolutely not.
THAT is what it would do. THAT is what I meant.
Blatantly false.
that we would see star-changes if we were stopped in rotation (unless -- like a God-hypothesis -- Zetas really are changing our tilt!).
That would be undeniably obvious to ALL the world's astronomers even though YOU couldn't tell. Nancy's 'tilt' claim is absurd.
Quoting: Menow 1003122Oh. Okay. Well the fixed stars are so far away that only sensitive measurements can detect the difference in them from one point in the year to the other (it's a parallax difference) -- and took a long time after Kepler predicted it, for the proof to be found. So, that's what I was referring to. But fine, if any astronomer can now tell the difference in the fixed stars from summer to winter (i.e., beyond the tilt issue of position, if they can tell the parallax slight change), that's fine. That would, then, be another proof against our having halted in our orbit -- but the other proof would be the rest of the objects in space anyway, which is why I didn't believe we are halted.:)
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
