I repeated and repeated I don't believe we're stopped.
Quoting: mclarek 1004307And you make NOTHING out of the fact that Nancy and "Zetas" are lying about that?
(The one almost-exception would be the toughness most people would have in figuring out the fixed stars' lack of parallax difference, as that's slight -- so they would look okay to many people, even most amateur astronomers).
That detail is equally absurd, each time you repeat it. Almost anyone could see that the major seasonal constellations were missing when they should be obvious in the sky.
Please explain stellar parallax and its meaning in your own words. No bogus links, just your understanding of it.
You are such a jerk that your "simple little questions" for me are clearly baiting: as if I don't know what parallax is!
Quoting: mclarek 1004307No one said you don't know what parallax is, you blooming idiot. It is that you are, as usual, wallowing in uneeded minutia. See above.
I am the one who BROUGHT IT UP: about video fakery on 9/11 (spawning Astronut's ill-fated inconclusive experiments to see what parallax shifts there were), AND about stars.
Quoting: mclarek 1004307And, as I pointed out, you applied parallax where it is not really helpfull. It's just you, pretending to know how to determine if something is wrong in the sky in the MOST difficult way, rather than the simplest. See above.
(snip)
