If you weren't being a shill for Nancy, there would have been NO discussion about any possible abnormal Earth tilt.
Crikey: I meant would seem okay to most.
PARALLAX - OF - DISTANT - STARS - HAS - NO - APPLICATION - IN - DETERMINING - ANY - POSSIBLE - CHANGE - IN - EARTH'S - TILT.
GET IT?
It would not be the determinant of tilt.
Quoting: mclarek 1004307YOU applied it to 'tilt'.
It would show we are stopped -- but so would other things. Unless the OTHER things are being changed by Zetas to fool us (light bending or whatever). Then maybe they missed the fixed stars' parallax problem.
Quoting: mclarek 1004307Gawd, Clare... You constantly wallow in what 'might be' rather than face obvious facts.
So, now, if Zetas bothered to adjust the planets, they might not quite bother with all the fixed stars. In that case, if there are Zetas, maybe they slipped up and we can test whether we're stopped, using parallax.
Quoting: mclarek 1004307Gawd, Clare... You constantly wallow in what 'might be' rather than face obvious facts.
I mean, it's probably silly, but still, one could test that, since all else seems to be fine.
It was merely an hypothetical thought experiment, Menow.
Quoting: mclarek 1004307Gawd, Clare... You constantly wallow in what 'might be' rather than face obvious facts.
a) If there are Zetas
b) If they are tilting us and adjusting the planets
c) If they missed the farthest stars' parallax light adjustments
d) Then we could test the parallax and know if we're stopped.
Quoting: mclarek 1004307Gawd, Clare... You constantly wallow in what 'might be' rather than face obvious facts.
It's a lot of IFs, some of them a priori, seemingly highly unlikely.
Quoting: mclarek 1004307Gawd, Clare... You constantly wallow in what 'might be' rather than face obvious facts.
But ... it's an interesting, probably useless, but interesting question.
Quoting: mclarek 1004307Gawd, Clare... You constantly wallow in what 'might be' rather than face obvious facts.
