Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,389 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 518,043
Pageviews Today: 675,108Threads Today: 203Posts Today: 2,778
05:58 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Poster Handle mclarek
Post Content
Does anyone have any other explanation than a PX cloaked or just out of view, for the magnetosphere repulsion on Earth when the Sun is attracting?


What exactly is "magnetosphere repulsion"?

What is meant by "the Sun is attracting"? Attracting who, or what? By what mechanism? Can you mathematically describe this in any way? Can you provide any evidence for this?

"Does anyone have any other explanation than a PX"
There is no evidence for PX. None.




There's a GREAT case for PX.

The issue is, it's ALSO a great case for co-incidence!

See that?



So, we need a key test, or key evidence. Since we really don't know what might be covered up or what NASA can see that we can't ...

We can go with this magnetosphere problem.

It was definitely an admission, and was definitely odd. So what was it?

NASA said the magnetosphere was repelled. In one of the articles they effectively described how magnets normally repel only when they're supposed to -- to be simple here about this.

The Sun goes through a change in polarity = every cycle of Sun spots. Now it seems we must have charge, as Einstein began to realize the moment he knew of any electromagnetism in the solar system (it was not known at all in 1950 until a week before his death!)

Our magnetosphere (we, actually, with our charge, probably) would be attracted at varying cycles and parts of the year. This is what NASA says they expect: lots of particle flow from the Sun. We had it.

What they DIDN'T expect, though, and said so, was GAP(s) AT THOSE TIMES OF YEAR.

Why? Normal magnet lines of flow show shared particles when magnets attract, and a palm-leaf-like separation of lines of flow (each magnet's lines touching however). This means a BREACH in the centre, a gap. But NO PARTICLES.

To have BOTH would be ridiculous.

But this is what we had!


Read the scientists' shock at this in the article.
[link to science.nasa.gov]


We had a BREACH in the North, not the South. It was when we were anti-aligned. It was when we were not supposed to.

I linked to one article but there was another (from Fox, about communications satellites) which isn't pulling up now. But a copy of it is kept here: [link to forum.concen.org] It describes magnetism for you again. And in more detail than I did.

Anyway, the breach is repulsion. It is for the South pole, so it is for the North and shouldn't be there. Also, it was 4x the size f Earth, which is what some people say PX is (thought I don't know if that's related; if it is, then it deserves to be mentioned).
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307 to Anonymous Coward 1006388


Let me know when you or anyone else has any thoughts on what, other than a PX, could cause this.

Thanks! cool2


Either these scientists are going to "up-end" electromagnetics on a wild goose chase (and it sounds like they're beginning to), or they will postulate we have charge and we were repulsed by 1 magnet and attracted by 1 magnet. 2 magnets. Simple. But that would prove PX.

So ... this could be a smoking gun for PX.

hiding
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP