Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,886 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 692,241
Pageviews Today: 913,461Threads Today: 249Posts Today: 3,645
07:57 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Poster Handle The Commentator
Post Content
Just for the sake of argument, if we do have chemtrails, moon landing hoaxes, Planet X's flying around, fake dead people, planets that don't move like normal, a GOM flow that was on purpose and other fun things . . .

just what exactly are we supposed to do about it once we get confirmation beyond a reasonable doubt????



1dunno1

We rethink our reality . . .


Or maybe you just need to think yours, because so far your 'evidence' has been lamentable and your proofs non-existent.

What proofs are you talking about? If you are talking about the Chemtrails . . . I have not even begun the process.



Which you will never complete because all that is required to retire the question is an in situ sample that contains your mythical chemicals.

But actually doing science will just ruin the conspiracy game, no?

It has been done over and over again . . . including the required Remote Temperature Soundings required for proper analysis. See below:


To interpret what these measurements mean, it is often necessary to know the temperature not just at the aircraft altitude -- where the chemical measurements are made -- but above and below the aircraft as well. The reason for this is that the vertical temperature profile provides meteorological context for the in situ measurements. For example, it is important to know whether the aircraft is in the troposphere (the lowest part of the atmosphere) or in the stratosphere (the next highest region). Ozone (O3) normally has much higher abundances in the stratosphere than the troposphere because it is produced there. Similarly, carbon monoxide (CO) has much higher abundances in the troposphere than in the stratosphere, because that's where it's produced. If high O3 and low CO are seen, one might conclude that the aircraft is in the stratosphere. However, this condition can occur occasionly in the troposphere, and the only way to know for sure what the real situation is is to measure where the thermal tropopause is located, as this separates the troposphere from the stratosphere. To do this this we need to measure an altitude temperature profile.
[link to mtp.jpl.nasa.gov]

The point is it is a shell game . . . many of the persistent contrails morph into cirrus clouds as do the Chemtrials. Finding the needle in the haystack is not likely with the resources available to the Chemtrail Advocates. The authorities have the upper hand in this game . . . Advocate's evidence will come from multiple authoritative sources.
 Quoting: George B



If you don't look, you will never find. But finding ruins the game so none of the chemtards cares enough about reality to look.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP