If you don't look, you will never find. But finding ruins the game so none of the chemtards cares enough about reality to look.

You might be surprised at how sophisticated the Advocates are getting . . . wait until the Debate/Trial in July.



Unless you have REAL data from an in situ sample I can pass.

Science is not run on a consensus basis. Concensus is a political concept, and politics and science are not interchangeable.

How about extensive scientific research sampling residual elements from biological sources that cannot be accounted for by any other means except deposition from the atmosphere.



Research performed by whom? Some chemtard that flunked high school chemistry?

Unless and until you have in situ samples you are just flapping your gums.

This is just a tease . . . I am not revealing my source or the rest of the research until the July Debate . . .





It is only a tease if you know nothing about the presentation of data, if you do you find your picture is utterly worthless.