Astronut might be able to answer

It's not a bad question at all. Here's my answer in short form; worlwide telescope and google sky both suck.


The PXers always depend on the poorest observation methods so they can think they find PX within their LARGE margins of error. That has been a constant from the beggining. It's how Nancy has always operated, too.


Precisely! This is why the 'best' images of Planet X tend to come from web cams!

Sorry, can't help myself, I have to nitpick; good images of planets are quite possible with webcams:

Yeah, I know, this kind of quality is never what you see when it comes to "planet X" or "nibiru" images :P . It's all about how you use the tools at your disposal, and with nibirutards they're always being used inappropriately, which is precisely why they find problems and errors.