Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Hey Zetamax, do you believe the Earth is halted in its orbit like Nancy said?

Looks like bridget is a Mark 1, Model Zero bumptard.

bridget is a few oats shy of a haggus, five cans short of a six pack.

But boycotting her has to sting, couldn't happen to a more deserving troll.

They both have sock puppets.

At least I have the courage to ask questions . . . I'll save you the trouble on your come back . . . "George, there are no stupid questions, there are only stupid people!"

True enough, bridget for one. i always knew maxipad was a pussy, not she confirms it...

What you say is true enough, George, but let me say this as constructive advice, NOT as a criticism toward you.

It seems sometimes your questions are rooted is a deep, profound ignorance of basic science, a deep lack of knowledge of scientific method, and a bias that if you see it on the web, it must be true, or at least contain some truth.

Serious suggestion: Go to your nearest bookmonger or good library and bone up on basic, high school level science, and the tools scientists use to figure out how things work.

I suspect that will show you that a whole helluva lot of what you read on the net is pure, unadulterated bullshit and you should pay it no attention.

At the very least you should have some fun summer reading.

Aim point RA: 6h 41m 55s Dec: +41°35'19" Fri 2010 Apr 9 19:23 UTC
:C - Mars 2:
[link to www.fourmilab.ch]

Astornut,

I would like your opinion regarding the coordinates we discussed yesterday. An individual claims that they used an IR capable camera and recorded an object at the coordinates RA: 6h 42m 8.44s, Dec: 41 40' 18.94" on 20 March 2010 from a location in southern Michigan. He later recorded an identical or similar object at 6h 41m 55.77s, 41 35'; 41 35' 19.45" on 9 April 2010. After consulting 'Your Sky' at [link to www.fourmilab.ch] (see graph above) it seems this object is found fairly close to the orbit of Mars. With your knowledge of camera capable telescopes which have the ability to record coordinates . . . is it possible:
1. The object may well be Mars because of the close proximity . . .
2. Some other star the individual is confusing the object with . . .
3. Individual has no clue of what he is doing . . .
4. He has possibly found something unique . . . .
Thanks for your time!

Source Material: IR Image’s location from YOUTUBE:
6h 42m 8.44s, 41 40’ 18.94” on 032010 [link to www.youtube.com]
6h 41m 55.77s, 41 35’ 19.45” 040910 At 1:15 AM EST
[link to www.youtube.com]

Last Edited by George B on 6/29/2010 at 5:13 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!


It seems sometimes your questions are rooted is a deep, profound ignorance of basic science, a deep lack of knowledge of scientific method, and a bias that if you see it on the web, it must be true, or at least contain some truth.


1. Just what lack of basic scientific method did I not demonstrate by this question?

2. If these were valid observations and correct coordinates it was potentially an interesting find.

Last Edited by George B on 07/02/2010 01:30 AM

George, lesson 1: Not everything you see on the net is true.

Some that is true it is of such low quality so as to be useless.

Last Edited by The Commentator on 07/02/2010 01:42 AM

I totally agree . . . I am becoming a much better researcher with every effort on the web. I have only been doing this for about a year. I was too busy with my career and family issues before now. Finding source documents and research is not always easy, but it is becoming easy with practice. So much on the web is just the repeating of something someone else said without any sources identified. When you find the original source you often find a misrepresentation or misquote, etc.

Last Edited by George B on 07/02/2010 01:59 AM

Yup, true words indeed.

Keep plugging away, it is a big universe, you will never learn it all, no one can, but you can sure get a leg up on those who won't even try.

Good night all!

Library is still better

Images and sound are hard to get on the newest events except on the net.

Last Edited by George B on 07/02/2010 07:47 PM

Very nice, thanks! Too bad there's no astronomy clubs where I am . . .

Wow . . . that looks great!

What about this one. It's from someones backyard balloon experiment.

It clearly shows Planet X
[link to farm2.static.flickr.com]

Nice Lens' Flare . . . at 1.49 - 1.51 Minutes

Lens flare is created when non-image forming light enters the lens and subsequently hits the camera's film or digital sensor.  This often appears as a characteristic polygonal shape, with sides which depend on the shape of the lens diaphragm.  It can lower the overall contrast of a photograph significantly and is often an undesired artifact, however some types of flare may actually enhance the artistic meaning of a photo.  Understanding lens flare can help you use it--or avoid it--in a way which best suits how you wish to portray the final image.
[link to www.cambridgeincolour.com]

Last Edited by George B on 07/02/2010 11:40 PM

Here is another good example of Lens' Flare . . . if you play these frame by frame you will see on both days the flare appears in the same identical way. It is not there one frame and then the next frame it appears. At 14 and again at 27 seconds.

Last Edited by George B on 07/02/2010 11:39 PM

:Artic Lens Flare:

Last Edited by George B on 07/02/2010 11:39 PM

But joe public still can't see it from Earth!

ooh, I guess it's being cloaked by the sun in an apparent tidal blowaround and the moons and tail are not currently visible because of the straight arc moonside lurker just beyond the ecliptic trajectory.

Just had to give myself a fix to appease the double talk withdrawal.



:greedy:

I'm surprised the woo-woos haven't been going nuts over the sun's activity...or, more specifically, lack thereof. Sunspot numbers should have been climbing towards an eventual peak sometime in 2013. But sunspot activity has been dismal at best, which kind of sucks because HF propagation has suffered...although 10 meters has been open almost daily, but that may be more likely due to sporadic E. Scientists don't know why the sun is been quiet...but it has happened before. I'm not when it happened, but the sun went through a 70 year period with few to no sunspots now called the Mauder Minimum. I wonder if we're going to experience another one. If so, it will be interesting to see what impact it has on Earth's climate. Many have suggested that global warming is linked to solar activity and some have suggested that our climate will begin to cool off the longer the sun goes without increased sunspot activity.

Get your snow suits now while they are cheap . . . mini-ice age around the bend!

I PMSL over this one from one of the ningtads...
Doesn't that first sentence sound kinda familiar????
Well yes it does, it was what nancy said
All the way back in 2004 (apparently they didn't notice the date)

Wow, a remote controlled rocket goes astray and somehow that means certain death? I wonder if it's possible to find a list of all the mishaps that have taken place since the dawn of space flight. These morons must live very sheltered lives.

Indeed. Particularly as it just docked flawlessly...

[link to www.nasa.gov]

The Zetas warnings seem to indicate that they never understood the children's parable about the sky falling...

It must really suck for the Zetas...always claiming they're right even though they get proven wrong time and time again.

Not that I care to deal with her nonsense again, but it sure is quiet around here without Clare-bear.

Certain death on the space station? Sounds like an old rerun that wasn't worth watching the first time. Hahaha.

I'm not missing Clare. She was as vapid as Freestore, as arrogant as Luser and as annoying as Max. It's nice to get back on topic. Did someone say that Cheryl from the ning is no more? Anyone know what happened? She was one of Nancy's biggest fans!!