Getting an in situ "chemtrail" sample is as great an effort as going to the Moon? What the fuck are you smoking/huffing/snorting?

Apollo occupied a budget of about 24 billion 1960's dollars and the combined efforts of on the order of half a million people.

Yet you claim that renting an aircraft, flying through what you claim is a chemtrail would be a comparable effort?

Are you mad, or just that staggeringly stupid?

What is so hard to understand that to a non-budget, non-organized group of citizens any budget is impossible . . . would you like to contribute to a fund I can start for that purpose?



A fund administered by YOU? No thanks.

You never did answer my question re the level of effort to get an in situ sample and a manned lunar landing: Are you mad, or just staggeringly stupid?

Simple math . . .

U.S. Government: budget 24 billion form a pocket book of Trillions.

Chemtril Advocates: Budget required to do it properly with temperature sounding, etc. probably a few hundred thousand to a million . .. Advocates pocket book . . . $0.00. That is the definition at this time of impossible.


Yes, we know you chemtards are broke. You do not have to repeat it, the fact can easily be derived from your messages.

Now for the question I asked: Apollo cost about 24 billion 1960's dollars and took the combined efforts of around half a million people. Are you saying that obtaining an in situ sample of a chemtrail would be as expensive and require as many people? . . . OF COURSE NOT don't be silly.

And where do you get your budget numbers? Please show your cost breakdown including the expenses for people, aircraft and analysis as separate budget line items.

Oh wait, you just pulled the number out of your ass, didn't you?


From the research I have reviewed the number of flights to just establish simple baselines and trends in contrail properties is very significant . . . probably twenty or so flights (statistical analysis parameters usually require 30 samples) with at least one multiengine fully equipped aircraft specially designed for such tasks. Some of the studies reqired more than one aircraft. Add to this the requirement to have temperature sounding ground equipment and I think my price I quoted is not unreasonable. I think many, many more flight would be necessary for proper Chemtrail research. Sorry, I have to run . . .



Exactly what I would expect from a chemtard: Arm waving followed by running away.

What the fuck are you smoking/huffing/snorting that results in your profound stupidity?

I have returned seems you don't agree with my analysis . . . just where would you start if you had to convince NASA, NOAA, DoE, DoD, EPA, academia and the prime news media?

You as a minimum would have to fly all times of the day and night to get samples in several different locations around North America and Europe. What do you think is the minimum necessary. Remember you are trying to prove to a disbelieving world full of critics like yourself . . .



All you need is one sample that contains the "toxins" that the chemtards claim are there. The rest is just confirmation.

And I note with great interest you have again failed to provide the least bit of support for your assertions.

You are clearly either trolling or a complete idiot.

What the fuck do NASA, NOAA, DoE, DoD, or the EPA have to do with conducting a simple sample collection to prove the claims the chemtards make? Methinks you are trying, quite unsuccessfully, to throw up a strawman.

I never stated that Chemtrails contain Toxins . . . where did you dig that up . . . are you sleeping well? You have absolutely no idea what I believe and don't believe. You are assuming things you want to believe not what I have presented. One sample is absurd . . . it proves NOTHING . . . total anomaly and you know it. And BTW if I were releasing toxins why in the world would I do it so you would have any way to confirm it . . . I would not be releasing it at 30,0000 feet plus either.