Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 09/11/2011 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 1541960 United States 09/11/2011 10:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 1541960 United States 09/11/2011 10:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: **ZetaMax** What a joke - why not use your "expertise" to share the TRUTH with the world: [link to www.ufovideos.ws] If they were there to "share," I would share them. Lots of things are flying around up there at night, but very, very, very few of them are anything approaching "strange." You just need the resolution necessary to see it. To a pair of night vision binoculars, these far away birds at 13 and 16 seconds would have looked like strange moving dots flying in formation before they crossed the moon. It was only because I was using a 2 meter focal length telescope that you can clearly distinguish them as just birds: [link to www.youtube.com] Are you SERIOUSLY asserting that Ed Grimsley is only looking at BIRDS??? Seriously??? And you want me to believe that you're 'not' a shill? Or a brainwashed imbecile??? Argument from incredulity, mixed with ad hominem. Want to prove that they're actually space aliens instead of something mundane? Then get yourself a nice robotic telescope, mount a night vision scope with a camera on top of the main telescope, use a sensitive video recorder or an IIE with a camera through the main telescope, and go investigate all those "weird" dots at very high angular resolution using optical tracking. It's up to the person making the incredible claim to prove it. I want to catch the alien mothership myself with my own scope, but I do not allow my emotional desires to dictate the standard of evidence I will accept. >> I do not allow my emotional desires to dictate the standard of evidence I will accept. I STRONGLY object to your arrogant and condescending POSTURING!!! |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 09/11/2011 11:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1417662 United States 09/11/2011 11:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cause the shuttle program is DEAD. There is NO credible "public" space program. It's hard to be a "nut" about "nut'n"! Hence the need for a new name - and avatar. There never was a "public" space program using the strictest sense of the word. The "public" were only spectators. As for the space program, there are multiple programs going that allow the "public" to see the results. You really are an idiot, aren't you? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1417662 United States 09/11/2011 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cause the shuttle program is DEAD. There is NO credible "public" space program. It's hard to be a "nut" about "nut'n"! Hence the need for a new name - and avatar. :wrong: :iss: What a joke - why not use your "expertise" to share the TRUTH with the world: [link to www.ufovideos.ws] That's a joke? That he managed to image the ISS with a telescope? Easily done with the proper equipment considering the size of the ISS. Quite a few amateur astronomers have been able to image the ISS with their telescopes. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 09/11/2011 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 09/11/2011 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cause the shuttle program is DEAD. There is NO credible "public" space program. It's hard to be a "nut" about "nut'n"! Hence the need for a new name - and avatar. There never was a "public" space program using the strictest sense of the word. The "public" were only spectators. As for the space program, there are multiple programs going that allow the "public" to see the results. You really are an idiot, aren't you? I don't do links here anymore due to what seems purely arbitrary bannings from them but if you go to Nasa's website, look at the top of the page is a button called `missions' and click on that, then click on current it shows how many launches are upcoming- I made it so a three year old could find the link - or maxipad... hmm maybe I should have aimed lower- 12 months and under??? In fact maxipad- there was a launch two days ago- the Grail Lunar Mapping mission I can see maxipads scratching his head in bewilderment- if the shuttles aren't flying- how can Nasa be still launching anything??? After all the shuttle was Nasa's only launch vehicle right??? (hint for melfy- the correct answer is NO.. OK?? did you get that??) |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 09/11/2011 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I personally feel that the demise of that particular `mouse designed by a committee' is a good thing- it never lived up to its expectations, and huge costs contributed heavily to the cutting back of other and IMHO far more deserving programs It was designed to do everything, and as a result it never really did anything WELL Its not as if Nasa really needs a personnel rated lifter that badly, there's several others in the space game that can lift Nasa personnel to orbit if required(as humbling as that might be having to rely on another countries spacecraft) or at a pinch, several of the US heavy lifters such as the Delta 4 Heavy is very close to being personnel rated with only minor mods (and if the need was great enough that rating could be ignored and personnel still would be willing to risk it) By modern standards, the old Saturn 5's would never have left the ground, but then that was a different time when cars didn't even have seat-belts (works new sedan has ELEVEN!!!! airbags) and people weren't so `precious' as they are these days... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1417662 United States 09/11/2011 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Cause the shuttle program is DEAD. There is NO credible "public" space program. It's hard to be a "nut" about "nut'n"! Hence the need for a new name - and avatar. There never was a "public" space program using the strictest sense of the word. The "public" were only spectators. As for the space program, there are multiple programs going that allow the "public" to see the results. You really are an idiot, aren't you? I don't do links here anymore due to what seems purely arbitrary bannings from them but if you go to Nasa's website, look at the top of the page is a button called `missions' and click on that, then click on current it shows how many launches are upcoming- I made it so a three year old could find the link - or maxipad... hmm maybe I should have aimed lower- 12 months and under??? In fact maxipad- there was a launch two days ago- the Grail Lunar Mapping mission I can see maxipads scratching his head in bewilderment- if the shuttles aren't flying- how can Nasa be still launching anything??? After all the shuttle was Nasa's only launch vehicle right??? (hint for melfy- the correct answer is NO.. OK?? did you get that??) I'm finally going to be able to see launches from Kennedy...taking a contract job in Melbourne, FL. One of my secret squirrel gigs. Almost saw the last night launch last November but it was cancelled in the wee hours of the morning - all that driving for nothing. |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 09/12/2011 03:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Over at the ning- she's dredged up the old dark twin garbage again Just how many bloody invisible planets are floating around the inner solar system now???- it's like a shopping center carpark on a Thursday night!!!! |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 09/12/2011 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re-runs again?! Apparently, she (or the "Zetas") need to hire some new writers. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/12/2011 08:31 AM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States 09/12/2011 02:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 1541960 United States 09/13/2011 06:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: **ZetaMax** Cause the shuttle program is DEAD. There is NO credible "public" space program. It's hard to be a "nut" about "nut'n"! Hence the need for a new name - and avatar. There never was a "public" space program using the strictest sense of the word. The "public" were only spectators. As for the space program, there are multiple programs going that allow the "public" to see the results. You really are an idiot, aren't you? I don't do links here anymore due to what seems purely arbitrary bannings from them but if you go to Nasa's website, look at the top of the page is a button called `missions' and click on that, then click on current it shows how many launches are upcoming- I made it so a three year old could find the link - or maxipad... hmm maybe I should have aimed lower- 12 months and under??? In fact maxipad- there was a launch two days ago- the Grail Lunar Mapping mission I can see maxipads scratching his head in bewilderment- if the shuttles aren't flying- how can Nasa be still launching anything??? After all the shuttle was Nasa's only launch vehicle right??? (hint for melfy- the correct answer is NO.. OK?? did you get that??) I'm finally going to be able to see launches from Kennedy...taking a contract job in Melbourne, FL. One of my secret squirrel gigs. Almost saw the last night launch last November but it was cancelled in the wee hours of the morning - all that driving for nothing. Perhaps it was a MYTH - just like the fictional moon landings. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 09/13/2011 06:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 09/13/2011 06:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States 09/13/2011 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 09/13/2011 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have- and a fine piece of FICTION it was too.. Just finished watching Babe- doesn't mean I have ever or will ever meet an intelligent talking pig You on the other hand seem to have a lot of trouble differentiating between FACT and FICTION (HINT- FICTION like Capricorn One, Babe, The Simpsons and zetatalk- ISN'T REAL... never has been and never will) |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States 09/13/2011 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have- and a fine piece of FICTION it was too.. Quoting: aussie 763624 763624 Just finished watching Babe- doesn't mean I have ever or will ever meet an intelligent talking pig You on the other hand seem to have a lot of trouble differentiating between FACT and FICTION (HINT- FICTION like Capricorn One, Babe, The Simpsons and zetatalk- ISN'T REAL... never has been and never will) ZetaTalk still has three and half months to be RIGHT!!! It's not game over yet! |
KeepingItReal User ID: 1444126 Canada 09/13/2011 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So what's up with Indonesia? Is it still underwater? Has Elenin brought devastation yet? Did I miss it? Nancy has been wrong since 1995. Not one thing has she gotten right, so its less than unlikely she will redeem herself in a few short months. You've been had, Max! Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 09/13/2011 10:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 1541960 United States 09/13/2011 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
aussie 763624 User ID: 763624 Singapore 09/14/2011 03:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A date is a date yes- and how MANY has the zeta babbler had come and gone ALREADY??? What makes you think that this dose of FAIL is going to be any different to the 20 or so previous dates that have come and gone with nary a sign of this (or the other invisible, imaginary dark) planet And I have NO TIME for anyone who preys on the dullwitted and/or vulnerable- like your MEGA FAIL profit nancy LIEder who was only in it for the money in the first place... |
Menow User ID: 1525529 United States 09/14/2011 09:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | They are still waiting for the "shock the world" over at the ning. I forgot about that bit. It was supposed to happen by the end of 2010, as I recall, but then Nancy changed it to "start to happen". Heh... Comment by Kris H 19 minutes ago Despite your best intentions, the truth is that you can't help people that don't want it. After the 7/10 shocks the world, it will be decision time. If people refuse to see the truth at that point, you are better off leaving them to their fate in this life, and focusing your energy on those who are genuinely interested in survival preps. Pathetic. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1417662 United States 09/14/2011 10:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17230 Germany 09/15/2011 05:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What a joke - why not use your "expertise" to share the TRUTH with the world: Quoting: **ZetaMax** [link to www.ufovideos.ws] No. The only experience he can have is that how an ill insane psychotic full idiot feels. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17230 Germany 09/15/2011 05:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So you admit she has never been until now ? Tick, tock.... 108. Still, it starts to get a tight fit as the "undeniable signs" where announced long enough before... and in fact NOITHING of this can be seen.... I just upgraded my stock of valuable single malt to another 3-4 Years nice enjoyment. Reminder for Nancy to think about a valid answer for her 2012 non-show since Nov 11, 2008. 1038 days gone, 108 days to go until Nancys final failure (at 1.1.2012) Nancy backpedalled first on July4th, 2009. ("Nancy-the Zetas made good use of the White lie,in May 2003. Could this work again in present time to confuse the TPTB??") -"SOZT This is within the realm of possibility. EOZT" Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat July 4 (Page 5) Nancy backpedalled second at July 18, 2009." As we have stated repeatedly, almost weekly, we will give NO indication of a timeline. " Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat July 18 (Page 2) Discussionthread about previous link ;-) [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Nancy backpedalled third at August 22, 2009. "NO time frame details can be relayed, period. But…... " (p 3), (White lie again) Nancytalk "this was admitted as entirely plausible in a recent chat. Check the chat archives", "Sattelite move whithin atmosphere" (somewhere), Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 22 (Page 3) Nancy backpedalled fourt at 5th Spt 09, SOZT ….It is still theoretically possible for a passage to cause nothing more than high tides and strong earthquakes…." EOZT, p3 Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat September 5 (Page 5) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17230 Germany 09/15/2011 08:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No, it doesn't. The "Zetas" said 2012 was "too far out"...that implies a length of time much greater than just 3 1/2 months. A date is a DATE - and I have no time or "implications". Ah - a date is a date ? Yes, it is, your NEXT FAILURE DATE is close : Melfys favourite Clif's published DOOM DATES: Thread: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! (Page 953) Cycle number | Maya strength number | Date Of Cycle 10 | 87.1 | Sunday, August 01, 2010 failed 9 | 42.24 | Wednesday, October 27, 2010 failed 8 | 2.3 | Saturday, January 22, 2011 failed 7 | 47 | Tuesday, April 19, 2011 failed 6 | 91.7 | Friday, July 15, 2011 Total Failure as predicted 5 | 223.6 | Tuesday, October 11, 2011 prospect and prediction: failure Funny is, that Cliffie proposes doom when another (nelles) doom should have hit for long…. 4 | 181.1 | Friday, January 06, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure 3 | 225.9 | Tuesday, April 03, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure 2 | 89.4 | Friday, June 29, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure 1 | 44 | Wednesday, September 26, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure 0 | 360 | Thursday, December 20, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure |
**ZetaMax** User ID: 1541960 United States 09/16/2011 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No, it doesn't. The "Zetas" said 2012 was "too far out"...that implies a length of time much greater than just 3 1/2 months. A date is a DATE - and I have no time or "implications". Ah - a date is a date ? Yes, it is, your NEXT FAILURE DATE is close : Melfys favourite Clif's published DOOM DATES: Thread: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! (Page 953) Cycle number | Maya strength number | Date Of Cycle 10 | 87.1 | Sunday, August 01, 2010 failed 9 | 42.24 | Wednesday, October 27, 2010 failed 8 | 2.3 | Saturday, January 22, 2011 failed 7 | 47 | Tuesday, April 19, 2011 failed 6 | 91.7 | Friday, July 15, 2011 Total Failure as predicted 5 | 223.6 | Tuesday, October 11, 2011 prospect and prediction: failure Funny is, that Cliffie proposes doom when another (nelles) doom should have hit for long…. 4 | 181.1 | Friday, January 06, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure 3 | 225.9 | Tuesday, April 03, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure 2 | 89.4 | Friday, June 29, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure 1 | 44 | Wednesday, September 26, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure 0 | 360 | Thursday, December 20, 2012 prospect and prediction: failure October 11th is coming up FAST. And as you can see from the Mayan "strength" number (223.6), it's SURE to be a DOOZY!!!!! Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 09/16/2011 07:31 PM |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 1332648 United States 09/16/2011 08:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | October 11th is coming up FAST. And as you can see from the Mayan "strength" number (223.6), it's SURE to be a DOOZY!!!!! Quoting: **ZetaMax** Yes, a doozy of a failure. Oh, and so much for doom from Comet Elenin: [link to www.universetoday.com] Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/16/2011 08:19 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |