Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Most probably every day is one day of Max's one or more doom dates - so dont worry, that proves everything is ok.

So what's up with that tiny insignificant comet Elenin? Did it bring doom to all mankind? Or was Max wrong yet again? We all know the answer. We predicted it, which makes the debunkers prediction track record close to perfect.

WHY does MAX LIE?

...and I'd say that you have what I call Applewhite syndrome.

C'me on, all people know (and that includes most bunkers) the issue is done.

its only 95 days now, and whatever should happen was supposed to have pre-changings visible until now.
and there is nothing.

Even Max has given up, so issume this thread is dead now until end of december when the very last idiots still utter the "soon"-bit.

The eleventh of oktober is the last chance for Max, after that he will fall silent and perhaps (say never never, Jane) thinking.



Reminder for Nancy to think about a valid answer for her 2012 non-show since Nov 11, 2008.
1051 days gone, 95 days to go until Nancys final failure (at 1.1.2012)
Nancy backpedalled first on July4th, 2009. ("Nancy-the Zetas made good use of the White lie,in May 2003. Could this work again in present time to confuse the TPTB??") -"SOZT This is within the realm of possibility. EOZT"
Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat July 4 (Page 5)
Nancy backpedalled second at July 18, 2009." As we have stated repeatedly, almost weekly, we will give NO indication of a timeline. "
Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat July 18 (Page 2)
Discussionthread about previous link ;-)
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Nancy backpedalled third at August 22, 2009. "NO time frame details can be relayed, period. But…... " (p 3), (White lie again) Nancytalk "this was admitted as entirely plausible in a recent chat. Check the chat archives", "Sattelite move whithin atmosphere" (somewhere),
Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat August 22 (Page 3)
Nancy backpedalled fourt at 5th Spt 09, SOZT ….It is still theoretically possible for a passage to cause nothing more than high tides and strong earthquakes…." EOZT, p3
Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat September 5 (Page 5)

Wow, Max hasn't been around much. Did Nancy finally lay him off too?

It's Max's MO. He will lie low until he figures enough water is under the bridge that we won't remember, but how could we forget? Or he is trying to find a way to spin things to cover his latest fail because he will never be man enough to admit he was wrong and mean it. Go away for a few months and as soon as I log in I see nothing changes.

LOL! Over on the ning, Nancy is using photos obviously taken at sunrise or sunset showing red clouds and using that as "proof" of red dust from "Planet X"....naturally, her sheeple lap it right up. There's also a photo of a "red sky" at night but it's obvious that what was photographed was city lights reflecting off an overcast sky.

And no questions about Indonesia not being under 80 feet of water, 9 months after she said it would be?

It's hard to tell if anyone ever questioned that. If they did, it would have been deleted right away.

They're not questioning her because she claims it has and is being covered up...even going so far as to say that people who are trying to get the truth out are being killed.

That has always been the most important aspect of the belief system she promotes- the coverup and conspiracy. Once she gets people to believe in that, she can get them to overlook anything and everything showing her wrong.

Why did nobody state that he has seen it under water... interesting, what will happen then.

Time 1972: Planet X

Science: A Tenth Planet?

It has been 42 years since Clyde Tombaugh, at Arizona's Lowell Observatory, discovered the last and outermost of the solar system's nine known planets. But many astronomers have never given up hope of finding a tenth planet even farther from the sun. They have been encouraged in their search by irregularities in the orbit of the eighth planet, Neptune, which some suspect could be caused by the gravitational tug of a mysterious "Planet X." Until now, however, all efforts to sight Planet X have failed.

This week a University of California scientist announced that he may finally have found that elusive target. Writing in the journal of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Joseph L. Brady of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory gave a description of the long-sought tenth planet, complete with its distance from the sun and its current position in the heavens. His "discovery" was made, not by scanning photographic plates, but by analyzing the erratic behavior of Halley's Comet, which comes into view every 76 years (next appearance: 1986), as it nears the sun in its elliptical and far-ranging orbit.

Checking historical observations dating back nearly 1,700 years, Brady found a peculiar irregularity: on each approach to the sun, Halley's Comet shows up as many as four days earlier or later than its predicted arrival date. That variation seemed to indicate that some unknown force must be influencing the comet's motion. Could it be the gravitational tug of a planet beyond Pluto?

For four years, Brady fed into a computer mathematical models of a ten-planet solar system, seeking the characteristics of a still undiscovered planet that would cause the irregularities in the comet's orbit. Gradually the description of Planet X emerged: it would be three times as massive as Saturn (second largest of the planets) and nearly 6 billion miles from the sun (more than half again as far as Pluto). It would take 464 years to complete a single trip around the sun, and the plane of its orbit would be tilted an angle of approximately 60° from the general orbital planes of the planets. Strangest of all, its motion would be retrograde; that is, it would travel around the sun in the opposite direction from all the other planets.

To convince skeptics, Brady has already begun additional computations to check the gravitational effects that Planet X would have on the known orbits of the outer planets. Still, the real test must be visual—a photograph of Planet X. At its great distance from the sun. however, Planet X would reflect only a modicum of light. Furthermore, Brady's calculations indicate that the planet is now located in the Constellation Cassiopeia, which is cluttered with so many stars that the planet would be hard to find. Nonetheless, Brady is hopeful that a sharp-eyed astronomer, scanning photographic plates, will some day detect a dim pinpoint of light reflected from far-off Planet X.

[link to www.time.com]

God freestore- how desperate ARE you???

1972???

Mums Kingswood had just rolled off the factory floor less than 6 months earlier
Costa cool $2700(which wasn't that cool as it included as standard- a motor and a body and 5 wheels....)
little else
NO aircon (not even an option on that model HQ); radio (am only - in glorious mono!!!)- extra; intermittent wipers or rear window demister- not available

What you did get was 4 wind down windows for demisting (with HANDLES) and even the cigarette lighter was an optional extra....




Since then cars have advanced `just a touch', and surprise surprise- what do you think has happened in the world of astronomy since then freestoned???

(Of course I don't actually expect a serious answer from our `word' Canadian clown- it just shows how truly desperate the zeta clowns are- they will try and use ANYTHING if it `advances' their cause (in their eyes of course)

The rest of us laugh at their childish antics, and occasionally learn something new (I been following the antics of a moon hoaxer called Jarrah White, which I am ashamed to say is an Aussie)- the best thing is that (like nancy and her socks) he claims victory when obviously the opposite has happened to anyone, but I discovered a whole new history of the moon landings to explore (I been a avid anti moonhoaxer for over 10 years- and I hadn't even heard of these pages before that thread- original copies of manuals, the `thinking out loud' notes of many of the leading lights of the moon race people, a complete hundreds of pages manual on the lander in pdf

makes freestoned and his LIEder not only `seem' a bit silly, but really rather pathetic

There is all these fascinating FACTS out there, and he and max still want to listen to that senile old bat's blitherings???

sad and rather pathetic

Good job, Free Store...your own link debunks Nancy. How? If "Planet X" existed as SHE describes it, then it would only have an impact on the orbits of Neptune and Haley's Comet every 3600 years.

But all isn't lost - even though that article is quite old, maybe you can contact them and tell them to quit looking to the outer solar and concentrate their search around the sun since that's where you and Nancy believe it is.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/30/2011 09:15 PM

I remember reading a popular mechanics article not long ago on youtube from the 1950's about Planet X. Didn't have it booked marked

AS far as I am concerned, Planet X is quite the catch among real Astronomers. Pluto was found while looking for Planet X

They must know alot about Planet X from older literature and writings. That;s the difference between the bunkers and the debunkers. The debunkers always want to hide there heads in the sand..aaaahhh. not very scientific.

Anyway I'm set for five years of survival. That security feels real good like nothing else. And you ?

`planet X' is (and has been for as long as I have been alive) astronomer talk for `unknown possible planet'

NOT


nancy LIEders bullshit invisible planet that doesn't exist...

`Japanese Godzilla syndrome' at its `best'....

`freestones view of japan'

OMFG japanese nuke...lear reactor in `massive meltdown' ITS GODZILLA!!!!

debunkers- IF it was a mythical mutant dinosaur- wouldn't there be some evidence- say... like maybe... a massive dinosaur that everyone can see??
`freestoned' it's there in plain sight- as long as you use a cheap webcam and focus it 2cm above the page of a national geographic photo of a dinosaur...

but say we wanted to see it in real life- not a crappy photo that could be anything- where would we go in Japan to see it- you know an address, a point on the globe??

`freestoned'- debunker fool - its in plain sight - right in front of you(deletes 16 lines of abusive language)

So if we get someone there to go to that spot they will see a massive lizard breathing fire??

(freestoned runs away for 6 months and hides in his bunker again- minus his family- because in the end they were less important than the stoners `survival')

what a waste of a life- at least his family aren't hiding in the bunker with him, that would be a bigger waste

ever think stoner that `maybe' (just maybe) you are wrong and you have wasted your entire life on a lie that is impossible and isn't ever going to happen??

have a good long think before dribbling more verbal diarrhea


is it possible that you(and the scamming wannabe cult leader(es) are wrong????

that planet x DOESNT exist??

what would that make your life worth????

WRONG as usual Free Store. Let's clarify something right now - although we've told you this many times - no "debunker" has ever said that a 10th planet doesn't exist...but we can't say it does either without concrete and verifiable evidence. And there's a HUGE difference between what astronomers are looking for and what Nancy talks about. Here's the REAL difference between "bunkers" and "debunkers":

Bunkers:
Here's our conclusion - what evidence can we find or twist to support it?

Debunkers:
Here's the evidence - what conclusions can we draw from it?

You don't think that's true? Let's look at your situation. You believe that "Planet X" as Nancy describes it is real...so real that you built a bunker, let your beliefs break up your family and even threatened to commit suicide if "Planet X" didn't show up - all without ANY evidence to show it existed in the first place. You simply believed whatever Nancy told you...which has all been proven wrong time and time again...without checking facts. To this day, you refuse to give up on this belief regardless of the fact that numerous "pole shift" dates have come and gone. So, tell us again, who's one that REALLY has their head in the sand? Explain how your beliefs are scientific.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 10/01/2011 10:04 AM

According to the latest on the ning, Manilla is sinking. I wonder what excuse she'll use in a year when Manilla is still above water. Art Bell lives there now and has his amateur radio station set up in their high level condo. If Manilla were indeed sinking, guaranteed he would talk about it. And it would be mentioned on Coast to Coast with George Snooray.

Geez...you're that freaking stupid Freeky?

I bet you've never bothered to read any of the scientific papers associated with the search for Planet X (I'm not talking about Nancy's planet eX). If you'd bother to read the literature, you'd see that what was theorized in no way, shape or form resembles what Nancy claims.

Read Harrington's papers...do a search through the Harvard/NASA scientific paper database...you'll see that I'm right.

You would think that sort of logic would matter, but it doesn't. I've watched it for too long. Nancy doesn't allow that sort of logic to be applied to her story. She gets them to accepting that they don't get to decide anything for themselves. They only think what she tells them to think, and its slick enough that they don't even know it's happening.

BUUUUTTT...

Indonesia is already underwater (people who claim otherwise apparently are paid debunkers according to nancy)

but that means I am living with a paid debunker!!

(my workmate who I have known for over a decade, went over there recently, installed a computerised fuel tank monitoring system and returned alive to crash at my flat over the last 3 weeks before leaving for western parts last week)

Even now I can dial into the system he installed (total cost about 1/4 million bucks) and see the current fuel levels in the big tanks (that are underwater as well apparently...)


Hmmm

what a dilemma...


nancy LIEder says its all not happening- I am imagining that my mate went over there (in a plane- no submarines required) and installed a computer underwater (funny I didn't know he was a scuba diver)


OR....

nancy LIEder is a LIAR...



what a dilemma- whatever shall I believe????

Prerequisites to join Nancy's little church of idiocy:
1. Cease all logical thought
2. Cease all critical thinking
3. Keep mouth shut except to praise Nancy
4. Do not question lest ye be labelled a heretic
5. Throw everything you learned about science out the door

That pretty much covers it.

...and if you read the ning, you'll see what I mean.

It's quite amazing that so many people (all 5,050 of them) suspend all rational thinking. They lap all the crap that Nancy and her minions spew as if it was the finest cream available.

It's either quite funny or quite pathetic. I'm leaning toward pathetic as I find it quite disappointing that so many people are so damn ignorant to believe her crap. Unfortunately, if the rest of the population is so damn gullible, it's no wonder the world is in such a crappy shape.

Last Edited by bob_909 on 10/02/2011 03:40 PM

I'm a member of the ning...I occasionally make posts there. It's hard sometimes to act so incredibly stupid.

......you were obviously taking notes to learn from the best, CB. I mean who better than Melfy's incredibily stupid behaviour here can one use to perfect your undercover mission over there at the Poleshit ning.

I could never keep an account there. I would ask obvious questions and get banned immediately. I even got banned for telling someone to google something once. You can't ask anything which implies that something Nancy or "Zetas" have said isn't right. They always SAY that you should confirm things for yourself, but the only option is to confirm that Nancy is right. You can't even research something FOR YOURSELF and determine that Nancy was wrong. It simply isn't allowed.

Oh man! Postman got banned AND his stuff all got deleted? What can I say. Shit gets flushed!