Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

On that same page: "Wiki has a photo of what you can see, stars wise, around Venus at sunrise. Note that numerous stars are visible, not just a few orbs close to Venus. Note they are not placed where the "moons" of Planet X illuminated near Venus in the video are placed. Different positions! These are not stars, in the video snap!"

********************

Who cannot understand that a WIKI image of the stars around Venus on some random, past date would not be the same as what is seen now?? The mind boggles at the sheer stupidity Nancy foists upon her followers... and they BUY it!

Yep. That ning post I quoted is now gone.

It's getting even better:
Thread: Another fail of Poleshit-Nancy - Planet X Moons Visible in Light from Venus!



.

I could save it on HDD - if someone is interested :-))


.

No need... The thing is, it will stay right there. I've seen it happen like this before. She doesn't get that it proves her wrong, and apparently neither will any of her flock. She has posted images from her Skymap program before that show how the Moon quite normally appears to be "tilted" from our perspective on a rotating Earth, but since no one is allowed to call attention to that fact on the ning, it remains a moot point. After all, only NANCY is allowed to "explain" what things mean. She could show an image of a kite and say it was Planet X and it would not be questioned. Oh wait... she did exactly that, one time! Heh.

Nancy has always used the "Mountain of Innuendo" method of proof. Any of the details, if examined, are wrong, but that doesn't matter because no one is allowed to do that and the vast steaming pile of BS SEEMS like it can't ALL be wrong.... but it is!

Someone posted a screenshot from todays video, clearly showing the movement of the Taurus constellation in relation to Venus.

Comment by Nancy Lieder 23 minutes ago

Sorry for the wild ride folks! But we are expecting signs in the skies. This was, you note, NancyTalk, not ZetaTalk. The initial photos did not show stars in the background, and until videos came in same time frame showing more stars, the patterns did not line up. Does Nancy stumble? Heck yes, I'm only HUMAN after all. And sometimes the Zetas do not alert me to this as it is done on purpose to mislead or disarm the establishment.


.

Haha, I wonder, just how much cognitive dissonance does this produce in her followers who just minutes ago were still defending this nonsense on youtube and god-knows where else? Does it ever shock them to realize the debunkers were right, even according to Nancy's admission? Does it even enter their mind as a possibility that she could be dead wrong about everything and maybe they should research for themselves to see if she is wrong? And do they ever look back at the people who were banned for daring to point out her mistakes and think, those people were right all along? I'm sure they'll resolve the conflict in their minds by just chalking it up to being part of the "plan" to "mislead the establishment" just like she said, so of course the debunkers were right, "the zetas" meant to do that!

To people that stupid, it doesn't even matter if she's right or wrong, because even if she's wrong, she's "supposed" to be wrong and they're supposed to play right along.

Nancy only has 92 Twitter followers?

Hell, my coffee machine has 8000+.

I'll bet Melfy could pick up more than 92, not even counting his sock puppets (Volar, Bridget, etc.).

The Returner returns! Welcome back man!

Thanks! I missed you guys. Good to see you still fighting the good fight!

Or mislead or disarm your few followers.

Funny how that one poster had his posts deleted for saying probably the same thing.

I wonder if this post will remain?


[link to poleshift.ning.com]

"Comment by Sepp Forcher 26 minutes ago
Nancy means that that there are no Mondswirls?

I can very well understand, even if you're wrong Nancy, you're only human. Why could they not discuss the letter from Tony Hunter and enlighten? But just delete his post and now he has left the Ning that is a shame, right?
It says it in the title: "If they decide" ....

and when they do talk was only Nancy, why should the user not then bring their "conservative" objection?

I'm really a fan of Zeta Talk, but allow no discussion can not be erfülltend for this forum, right?
I'm sure my post, and my account will be canceled pursuant to this post ^ ^"

Yes, but if the official ZETATALK is wrong, she just changes it, like she did the other day on the Neumayer Station thing.

I wonder how stupid this person feels about now.


[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Comment by Katche 4 hours ago
"Brilliant, just brilliant! There is that smell again...wait...EGG ON THEIR FACES! Nancy / Zetas right from the beginning.
Thank you for letting the common people know about this."

Nancy changed the headline from
"Planet X Moons Visible in Light from Venus!"
to
"Planet X Moons Visible in Light from Venus? Or Stars? You Decide!"
and deleted some text that shows her stupidity.


And some of the PS-ning members get rebellious:

Comment by Sepp Forcher 20 minutes ago
"Nancy means that that there are no Mondswirls?

I can very well understand, even if you're wrong Nancy, you're only human. Why could they not discuss the letter from Tony Hunter and enlighten? But just delete his post and now he has left the Ning that is a shame, right?
It says it in the title: "If they decide" ....

and when they do talk was only Nancy, why should the user not then bring their "conservative" objection?

I'm really a fan of Zeta Talk, but allow no discussion can not be erfülltend for this forum, right?
I'm sure my post, and my account will be canceled pursuant to this post ^ ^"


.
Edit:
Sorry for the double post - Menow was a little faster :-)


.

Last Edited by Hydra on 07/09/2012 03:56 PM

I see that Nancy has deleted her own earlier post saying that there would be new Zetatalk on this "sighting". Heh.

Maybe the Zetas will issue a statement saying "Look, we really don't know anything about astronomy. Who wants to talk about LOL Cats?"

Yep. That second post I grabbed, complaining about the first guy getting deleted, is now gone. Hilarious! It's a chain-reaction purge!

Don't you dare question Nancy, even when she admits she's wrong! Good to see that at least some of flock are starting to wake up and smell the bullshit.

Not only the post - the poster too.


.

Hilarious that she says "You Decide" when anyone who actually decides anything for themselves and speaks out about it gets immediately banned!

Yep. It's: WE BANNED SOMEONE FOR NO GOOD REASON, BUT YOU GET BANNED FOR POINTING THAT OUT!!!!

Someone is taking pages from the Church of $cientology playbook!

Wow.

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Now even the posts gushing about how great a discovery this was have been cleansed away, including the one about debunkers having "egg on their face" over it. Only about 1/2 of the original posts remain - it's back down to one page. Heh.

Deleted:

Comment by astrogal50
"Wow! This can be seen naked eye, so what is the cover up going to say about this?! No red filter involved, no equipment at all, just human eyes. The Establishment will likely say nothing, just like nothing is said about the moon, stars, and sun being frequently out of position."


Deleted:

Comment by Katche
"Brilliant, just brilliant! There is that smell again...wait...EGG ON THEIR FACES! Nancy / Zetas right from the beginning.
Thank you for letting the common people know about this."


Deleted and kicked off:

Comment by Tony Hunter
"My previous posts have been removed without reason, other than they are not in agreement with what people think this is. I am sorry that open communication is not welcomed here. I have requested that my affiliation with this site be terminated. Much love and peace to you all."


Deleted and kicked off:

Comment by Sepp Forcher
"Nancy means that that there are no Mondswirls?
I can very well understand, even if you're wrong Nancy, you're only human. Why could they not discuss the letter from Tony Hunter and enlighten? But just delete his post and now he has left the Ning that is a shame, right?
It says it in the title: "If they decide" ....
and when they do talk was only Nancy, why should the user not then bring their "conservative" objection?
I'm really a fan of Zeta Talk, but allow no discussion can not be erfülltend for this forum, right?
I'm sure my post, and my account will be canceled pursuant to this post ^ ^"


.

Oh this is just toooooo delicious!

"...My previous posts have been removed..."

We must have missed some early posts from Tony Hunter on that thread, outlining his take on the images. Clearly he did not agree with the early hysteria that it was Nancy's planet, and was apparently right, but got deleted and banned anyway.

LOL!! I love her excuses. She's always right...except for when she HAS to admit she's wrong. And then it isn't her fault - it's the "Zetas" fault because they did it on purpose to keep people guessing.

Yep, and she hasn't figured out that the harder she squeezes, the more that slip through her fingers. She'll simply wake up one morning and wonder where all her followers went.