Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

+1000

What? Nancy even deleted posts from her attack bitch?

Of course, she just didn't ban the attack bitch. It was a favor, not a punishment; in light of Nancy's now-admitted mistake, astrogal's comment now looks ridiculous. The ones who actually realized the mistake get banned though.

Last Edited by Astromut on 07/09/2012 08:13 PM

I suspect Astrogal deleted her own post, to save face.

I would find that hard to believe - she goes out of her way to be nasty towards anyone that doesn't believe Nancy (aka "paid debunkers"). Who was the other one - that used the avatar of that chick from The Matrix?

Yeah, but look what she said:

"Comment by astrogal50
"Wow! This can be seen naked eye, so what is the cover up going to say about this?! No red filter involved, no equipment at all, just human eyes. The Establishment will likely say nothing, just like nothing is said about the moon, stars, and sun being frequently out of position."

It makes her look like an idiot, given that Nancy retracted her statements about what it was.

Aha, I've never been able to be a member long enough to find out that you can delete your own posts.

Astrogal50 is the head moderator over there.

Never been able to be there long enough to find that out either lol.

I just found out some of the details by reading the defector's recent pages. He outlines the whole thing. He says that Astrogal outranks Gerard over there and is basically second-in-command.

Apparently some people over there don't even get that they didn't capture PX, by Nancy's own admission!:

"Comment by Leo Burguete 2 hours ago
Congratulations! Very good pictures, Keep up Nancy and Gerard. Do not pay attention to shills and trolls. Congratulations Heyre Maier excellent work!"

I think yesterdays "Moonswirls" led on to "Member-swirl":

91 pages - 21 x 91 = 1,911


.

At this rate the ning will end up like the last one she had(what was the name of it again- was about 2005 I think, ran for about six months before it self destructed)

(and she still hasnt found my still active account either, at least it was still active yesterday)

Do you mean the yahoo group tt-watch?

Which, amazingly enough, is still alive! I took a quick look and saw that Michael Cunningham (debunker) amd istari (bunker) still posting on the thing.

[link to groups.yahoo.com]

What's kind of funny, to me, is that if I try to go to the ning using FireFox, I get the banner saying I've been banned. But if I go to the same link using IE, I get in just fine.

And it goes on:

Post still online but "Leo Burguete is no longer a member of Earth Changes and the Pole Shift."

Aparently they got the quiet irony in the post.


Oh, and members start to post Stellarium screenshots and links to YouTube-NASA-Videos ( [link to www.youtube.com]



.

Resolved the issue with Firefox and the banner saying I was banned. Just had to clear out the cache.

Don't be bitter, Melfy, I missed you too.

In fact, by keeping ZetaSquawk visible, you've done science a great service -- because any time the Zeta hogwash is extolled, it is revealed for the nonsense it truly is.

So thanks for all your hard work!

Seriously, hope you're well.

Wow- Cunningham... I didn't know he was still around. He was a major player in the 'old days'. For those who don't know, he is the person Nancy called a "pimp" during the live chat and led to her getting kicked out of her own chat that day.

nah, not the yahoo groups, she had a blog/ning type small forum set up once before, it imploded within about six months when she got ban happy and all the posters left- but for the life of me, I cant remember what it was called (I was trying to find if it was still available, it had some great `nancyisms' on it)

>> Seriously, hope you're well.



The STS haven't gotten me yet.

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 07/10/2012 09:45 AM

Yes, and quite a playbook it is. They are also famous for false statistics. Speaking of which, did you know on the Ning the page view stats can be easily manipulated by just clicking refresh? She has such problems with TINY TINY nings who don't manipulate their stats. Haha!

So, which mods get assigned to F5 (refresh) their way to heaven? Or does she take on that sacred duty herself so the next evacuation of mods won't tattle on her?

You realize her quote "Sorry for the wild ride folks! ... Does Nancy stumble? Heck yes, I'm only HUMAN after all. And sometimes the Zetas do not alert me to this as it is done on purpose to mislead or disarm the establishment" is a confession that ZT DOES publish disinformation? And if it disinforms the "Establishment" it disinforms the followers as well. Thus, she has effectively killed any and all credibility of Zetatalk, because who knows what's true and what's not?

Try [link to web.archive.org] It's on the Way Back Machine, search [link to www.skepticalmind.com.] Brian Gillbank did an article called "Sudden Death."

Similar to the observation that although "Zetas" have stated that they can't interfere with the "natural" effects of Planet X on the planet Earth, they are still allegedly moving the Earth and sky objects around to "simulate normalcy".

The contradictions in Zetatalk number in the thousands by now.

Have you tried that skeptical mind link lately?

I see that skepticalmind.com no longer exists, but you can find that content on the 'wayback'.

Your observation is spot on, Menow.

Yes, when you get to the wayback machine, then search [link to www.skepticalmind.com.] From there, click on Zetatalk, then click on the Dissent tab to find Brian Gillbank's article (where she/they were monitoring the emails), and also check out the other articles.

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

ZetaMax in

3
2
1