I do - "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" is a how-to manual for anyone wanting to design a truly effective PSYOP.

Imagine, that the danger is not "wolves", but "those bent on world domination". Intelligent "wolves" - in other words. Such "wolves" would not be satisfied with allowing the course of events to play themselves out "naturally". TOO RISKY. Rather, they would engage "wolf think tanks" to figure out how they could manipulate and transform obstacles into ASSETS. The boy is initially an OBSTACLE - but later became an ASSET. Now in the fable, it happened "naturally" due to the natural inclination of the boy. BUT ... what if you could send in an agent (or team of agents) to BRIBE the boy, or perhaps, armed with a full psychological profile, figure out how to amplify the boys proclivities that serve your agenda - ideally without the boy even being aware of the manipulation! Maybe you'd send in a another "boy" who would DARE the boy to cry wolf - on multiple occasions. And because the boy had low self-esteem, and desires to be "friends" with the agent child - the boy goes along with the "encouragement".

In the end, the manipulation changes the odds of the outcome in favor of the WOLVES.

Care to dispute that?