| Users Online Now: 2,001 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 803,606 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,079,804 | Threads Today: 286 | Posts Today: 4,527 |
| 09:16 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,001 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 803,606 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,079,804 | Threads Today: 286 | Posts Today: 4,527 |
| 09:16 AM | ||
Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
MatrixLNIN11  User ID: 21310346  United States08/17/2012 04:28 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please remember this if Obama announces the presence of Planet X: Dr. Astro insists Planet X is not real. Circuit Breaker insists Planet X is not real. So neither of them can say squat about Planet X after an official announcement! They cannot say that the Planet X announced is real but the Planet X being discussed for so long is not. Cannot have it both ways. That would be dishonest. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1641673 Considering Obama will announce no such thing, you've got nothing to worry about. BTW, nice of you to join us Astrogal50. Seconded. Nice that someone (from the Mods) has the courage to speak-up though. Gal, there won't be any announcement. Nancy already prepared "it may or may not happen"... What do you think will be the more likely outcome, given Nancy's "track record"... Remember the 7/10? Remember the alleged "COW punches"? Remember 2003? Remember the "PEN #1" lie? Time to wake up gal.   I think Hap owes me a REFUND! Here is Nancy saying, not that 2012 was too far out, but that December 21st, 2012 was too far out!!! I was  for paying off Hap!!!Bear in mind that the Zetas have stated they will NOT give a date, having only made the statement that the date of Dec 21, 2012 is too far in the future, the pole shift occurring before that date ... [link to www.zetatalk.com]  HA HA!!!     Zeta, yer my new Glp hero! He he |
| MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 21310346 United States08/17/2012 04:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 Why this time next year? What is the qualitative difference in waiting until then? What will make the evidence compelling THEN that isn't compelling NOW? John Moore says Niburu is DAYS away!! John Moore is DEAD WRONG! Thread: Nibiru Analysis *Jupiter analysis on page 20*  Someone gave me negative karma for being "an Astromut fan"OH THE IRONY!!!!   TEE HE HE HE oh god yer killin me dude! ahaha hoho haha snort snort |
| MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 21310346 United States08/17/2012 04:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey...he could just do that. Didn't you know? There are clones out there. Nancy claimed Bush had several...eight I think. Quoting: Circuit Breaker It's widely known that Obama is the clone of the Pharoah Akhenaten:  dudeI almost spit up my drink there bro  this is better than the improv HE HE   Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 08/17/2012 04:36 AM |
| MatrixLNIN11 User ID: 21310346 United States08/17/2012 04:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | But DOCTOR - the mass of Neptune was off by "only" 0.5 percent - and the mass of the gas giants only slightly tweaked (your words). Quoting: **ZetaMax** And as Myles Standish proved and I confirmed, that was enough to make a difference. The perturbations were/are REAL, it's only the MODEL to describe them that's in dispute. Quoting: maxSemantics, the "perturbations" are from that inaccurate mass figure for neptune. Allow me to use a more precise term, residuals. The residuals in the astrometric data go away when you fix the mass of neptune. Harrington's Planet X had to be HUGE - at least three times the mass of earth in order to complement Pluto's "surprisingly" small mass. How can a 0.5 percent drop in Neptune's mass "miraculously" cure such a HUGE discrepancy given Pluto's small mass, and eliminate the "need" for a HEAVY MASS OBJECT beyond Pluto's orbit to compensate? Quoting: maxYou're bitching about something which is not even disputable, fixing Neptune's mass DID fix the problem. "Planet X" was supposed to have a semi-major axis more than three times as large as Neptune's, hence it had to be much more massive than the real discrepancy in order to account for the perturbations. I get it - the 0.5 number was settled upon because anything bigger (and MUCH MORE realistic) would be not just absurdly insulting to earlier astronomers Quoting: maxWrong. The "0.5 number" actually fixed the problem. Myles Standish proved it and I already confirmed it. You're once again proving your ignorance and ignoring the facts of the matter and pretending they are not facts. ... 14, August, 1978 which is just about six weeks after we discovered the fact that Pluto has a satellite. Once you have a satellite for a planet you can determine how heavy it is. It turns out Pluto was very much smaller and lighter weight than we thought which meant that Pluto has no influence, no appreciable influence on the motions of the planets Uranus and Neptune. At that point, we foist a hypothesis that there is at least one yet to be discovered planet in the outer regions of the solar system Dr. Robert Harrington, August 30, 1990 Neptune has thirteen known moons, by far the largest of which is Triton, discovered by William Lassell on October 10, 1846, just 17 days after the discovery of Neptune itself. [link to en.wikipedia.org] So Neptune's mass has been measured for more than 150 years - and all this time we've been getting it WRONG. How incredibly convenient. In the Sitchen video, a Detroit News article is shown dated January 16th, 1981 with the headline "Tenth Planet? Pluto's orbit says 'yes'" Did the Voyager data "magically" fix the math for Pluto's orbit as well??? And all this within FOUR MONTHS of Harrington's death??? Again AMAZING co-incidence!!! But wait, it gets BETTER!! Your "Standish" article was published in May of 1993, but was written in July of 1992, and REVISED in December of 1992. Harrington is DEAD just ***DAYS*** after the article that is to SET THE WORLD RIGHT is tweaked for final publication. It's most likely critic of enormous reputation and stature, CONVENIENTLY disappears from the scene, forever unable to challenge it. SIMPLY INCREDIBLE!!! And Harrington's wife believes he was MURDERED. Crazy lady ...  :dubya:  Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 08/17/2012 04:52 AM |
| Truther User ID: 22116187  Germany08/17/2012 05:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Zetamax is coming from Zetatalk and the ridiculous poleshit ning, so living and dealing with nonsense is his daily bread. Where others have a good laugh (for example because of Alberto Cardins lense flares) he is looking for the sense of life. It is a sad story with some funny elements. @Circuit Breaker: So according to crazy Nancy Bush had eight clones. Hopefully they do not all look like Michael Jackson. Perhaps we can find Elvis Presley somewhere there too ....  |
| Xorizov User ID: 22116114  Sweden08/17/2012 05:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 21705985 United States08/17/2012 06:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878  United Kingdom08/17/2012 07:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | jeez I am getting sick of this site and its `blanket bans-just send us money' crap glad to see melfy is still in full blown meltdown mode tho `fence sitter' my arse- he wouldn't accept he was wrong even if we gave him a full tour of the solar system in a rocket.... (can we please- I'll pay for the fuel to get him into space- but NOT for the fuel to bring him back- LOL) |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 754486 United States08/17/2012 07:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Zetamax is coming from Zetatalk and the ridiculous poleshit ning, so living and dealing with nonsense is his daily bread. Quoting: Truther 22116187 Where others have a good laugh (for example because of Alberto Cardins lense flares) he is looking for the sense of life. It is a sad story with some funny elements. @Circuit Breaker: So according to crazy Nancy Bush had eight clones. Hopefully they do not all look like Michael Jackson. Perhaps we can find Elvis Presley somewhere there too .... >> Zetamax is coming from Zetatalk and the ridiculous poleshit ning Really? Do you have PROOF for this? Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 08/17/2012 07:45 AM |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878 United Kingdom08/17/2012 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Zetamax is coming from Zetatalk and the ridiculous poleshit ning, so living and dealing with nonsense is his daily bread. Quoting: Truther 22116187 >> Zetamax is coming from Zetatalk and the ridiculous poleshit ning Really? Do you have PROOF for this? Well you did choose the user name `zetamax' for starters this alone is certainly indicative that you consider the zetas to be the max??? (or maybe your first name is zeta and your last name is max???- should be pretty easy o find a lawyer that's a 11/9 survivor with that name tho...) and there is also your considerable posting history in this thread- always supporting nancy and other doomsayers of her ilk- I have all of this thread archived off net, and your position is pretty clear- you are no `fence sitter' and certainly a `doomer' that supported nancy at the beginning (and imho- still do) You can protest all you like, but nobody could post so consistently over that period of time just as a lark or for a leg pull, you believe this doomsday crap with your whole heart and mind and noone here believes you are a fence sitter anymore than anyone here believes I am the king of siam.... |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 754486 United States08/17/2012 08:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Zetamax is coming from Zetatalk and the ridiculous poleshit ning, so living and dealing with nonsense is his daily bread. Quoting: Truther 22116187 >> Zetamax is coming from Zetatalk and the ridiculous poleshit ning Really? Do you have PROOF for this? Well you did choose the user name `zetamax' for starters this alone is certainly indicative that you consider the zetas to be the max??? (or maybe your first name is zeta and your last name is max???- should be pretty easy o find a lawyer that's a 11/9 survivor with that name tho...) and there is also your considerable posting history in this thread- always supporting nancy and other doomsayers of her ilk- I have all of this thread archived off net, and your position is pretty clear- you are no `fence sitter' and certainly a `doomer' that supported nancy at the beginning (and imho- still do) You can protest all you like, but nobody could post so consistently over that period of time just as a lark or for a leg pull, you believe this doomsday crap with your whole heart and mind and noone here believes you are a fence sitter anymore than anyone here believes I am the king of siam.... Are you one of those "Conspiracy Theory" whackos?  Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 08/17/2012 08:09 AM |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878 United Kingdom08/17/2012 08:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878 United Kingdom08/17/2012 08:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know damn well that my position has been, and always will be- that nancy LIEder is a fraud at worst, mentally unstable at best- and that I consider that YOU have always been a supporter of hers from your first post in this thread despite your protests of being a `fence sitter' from the beginning IF you are indeed a fence sitter- then I will have to request you call me by my title `Your Majesty' will do just fine LOL (thats sarcasm btw- I know that thinking intelligently isn't one of your stronger points) |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 21705985 United States08/17/2012 08:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Circuit Breaker User ID: 21705985 United States08/17/2012 08:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If he were truly a "fence sitter", he wouldn't support (insert failed prophet's name here) so much. Nor would he call people "debunkers" or "paid shills" simply because they don't see his or (insert failed prophet's name here)'s point of view. The fact that he so vehemently supports Nancy and (insert failed prophet's name here) while dismissing other points of view proves that he is NOT a "fence sitter." A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 21217730 United States08/17/2012 08:56 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States08/17/2012 10:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 3 of 3 God Code Matrix Video's AGREE [link to www.youtube.com] 4 seals the deal Stanley was definitely onto something... that is until the same group that killed Harrington got to him he he DUDE!(ETTE) You definitely GOT MY ATTENTION! Did you make these AWESOME videos? And  for the generous compliments. It's nice to know that "someone" appreciates my "efforts" (marginal though they may be).I applaud you! Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 08/17/2012 10:26 AM |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878 United Kingdom08/17/2012 10:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 3 of 3 God Code Matrix Video's AGREE [link to www.youtube.com] 4 seals the deal Stanley was definitely onto something... that is until the same group that killed Harrington got to him he he DUDE!(ETTE) You definitely GOT MY ATTENTION! Did you make these AWESOME videos? And :color_thank_you: for the generous compliments. It's nice to know that "someone" appreciates my "efforts" (marginal though they may be). I applaud you! sighs and melfy has the utter nerve to call himself a fence sitter..... |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States08/17/2012 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 3 of 3 God Code Matrix Video's AGREE [link to www.youtube.com] 4 seals the deal Stanley was definitely onto something... that is until the same group that killed Harrington got to him he he DUDE!(ETTE) You definitely GOT MY ATTENTION! Did you make these AWESOME videos? And for the generous compliments. It's nice to know that "someone" appreciates my "efforts" (marginal though they may be).I applaud you! sighs and melfy has the utter nerve to call himself a fence sitter..... Of course I remain a FENCE SITTER. But that doesn't mean I can't get a little "excited" about learning something NEW once in a while!! |
| Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 14554787 United States08/17/2012 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444 Why this time next year? What is the qualitative difference in waiting until then? What will make the evidence compelling THEN that isn't compelling NOW? John Moore says Niburu is DAYS away!! John Moore is DEAD WRONG! Thread: Nibiru Analysis *Jupiter analysis on page 20* Someone gave me negative karma for being "an Astromut fan"OH THE IRONY!!!! That's ok, someone just gave me negative karma for being a "Niburutard." Besides max, I thought you were on the fence? Shouldn't you be getting excited about me and my videos too? You only get excited about nibirutard videos though... because you're not on the fence at all.  |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States08/17/2012 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If he were truly a "fence sitter", he wouldn't support (insert failed prophet's name here) so much. Nor would he call people "debunkers" or "paid shills" simply because they don't see his or (insert failed prophet's name here)'s point of view. The fact that he so vehemently supports Nancy and (insert failed prophet's name here) while dismissing other points of view proves that he is NOT a "fence sitter."  |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States08/17/2012 11:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Dr. Astro Someone gave me negative karma for being "an Astromut fan"OH THE IRONY!!!! That's ok, someone just gave me negative karma for being a "Niburutard." Besides max, I thought you were on the fence? Shouldn't you be getting excited about me and my videos too? You only get excited about nibirutard videos though... because you're not on the fence at all. >> Shouldn't you be getting excited about me and my videos too? OK - sure, why not?   Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 08/17/2012 11:51 AM |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878 United Kingdom08/17/2012 11:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If he were truly a "fence sitter", he wouldn't support (insert failed prophet's name here) so much. Nor would he call people "debunkers" or "paid shills" simply because they don't see his or (insert failed prophet's name here)'s point of view. The fact that he so vehemently supports Nancy and (insert failed prophet's name here) while dismissing other points of view proves that he is NOT a "fence sitter." :wanted__: points to above post is that a fence sitter?? points to the last 3 years of melfys crap- can ANYONE point out a single post (you are included in this melfy) that he DIDNT support a doomer??? anyone????? (fence sitter my american fanny....) |
| **ZetaMax** User ID: 659599 United States08/17/2012 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If he were truly a "fence sitter", he wouldn't support (insert failed prophet's name here) so much. Nor would he call people "debunkers" or "paid shills" simply because they don't see his or (insert failed prophet's name here)'s point of view. The fact that he so vehemently supports Nancy and (insert failed prophet's name here) while dismissing other points of view proves that he is NOT a "fence sitter." points to above post is that a fence sitter?? points to the last 3 years of melfys crap- can ANYONE point out a single post (you are included in this melfy) that he DIDNT support a doomer??? anyone????? (fence sitter my american fanny....) >> the last 3 years of melfys crap  In just THREE days it will be the 5th Anniversary of my first appearance here at GLP. Here is my very FIRST GLP thread! (Some of you will remember it!) Thread: ZetaTalk - On Paid Debunkers Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 08/17/2012 12:03 PM |
| Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 21217730 United States08/17/2012 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: **ZetaMax** That's ok, someone just gave me negative karma for being a "Niburutard." Besides max, I thought you were on the fence? Shouldn't you be getting excited about me and my videos too? You only get excited about nibirutard videos though... because you're not on the fence at all. >> Shouldn't you be getting excited about me and my videos too? OK - sure, why not? You're a few days too late and a few thousand dollars too short. |
| Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 21217730 United States08/17/2012 12:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Circuit Breaker If he were truly a "fence sitter", he wouldn't support (insert failed prophet's name here) so much. Nor would he call people "debunkers" or "paid shills" simply because they don't see his or (insert failed prophet's name here)'s point of view. The fact that he so vehemently supports Nancy and (insert failed prophet's name here) while dismissing other points of view proves that he is NOT a "fence sitter." points to above post is that a fence sitter?? points to the last 3 years of melfys crap- can ANYONE point out a single post (you are included in this melfy) that he DIDNT support a doomer??? anyone????? (fence sitter my american fanny....) >> the last 3 years of melfys crap In just THREE days it will be the 5th Anniversary of my first appearance here at GLP. Here is my very FIRST GLP thread! (Some of you will remember it!) Thread: ZetaTalk - On Paid Debunkers Another perfect demonstration of how not-on-the-fence you are. Paid debunkers huh? |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878 United Kingdom08/17/2012 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Circuit Breaker If he were truly a "fence sitter", he wouldn't support (insert failed prophet's name here) so much. Nor would he call people "debunkers" or "paid shills" simply because they don't see his or (insert failed prophet's name here)'s point of view. The fact that he so vehemently supports Nancy and (insert failed prophet's name here) while dismissing other points of view proves that he is NOT a "fence sitter." :wanted__: points to above post is that a fence sitter?? points to the last 3 years of melfys crap- can ANYONE point out a single post (you are included in this melfy) that he DIDNT support a doomer??? anyone????? (fence sitter my american fanny....) >> the last 3 years of melfys crap :dwagain: In just THREE days it will be the 5th Anniversary of my first appearance here at GLP. Here is my very FIRST GLP thread! (Some of you will remember it!) Thread: ZetaTalk - On Paid Debunkers from that threads first post- by you.... ***ZetaMax*** Offer Upgrade User ID: 105988 United States 08/20/2007 07:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation ZetaTalk - On Paid Debunkers The following are links to ZetaTalk.com, discussing the reality of paid debunkers whose job it is to discredit ZetaTalk and Nancy, and continue the cover-up. Having engaged them directly, I more confident than EVER that the enemies of ZetaTalk are led by a vanguard of PAID DEBUNKERS. Read the material below - and decide FOR YOURSELF. Thank you. ZetaMax fence sitter??? no nancy/ doomer?? yes paid??? at one time- quite possibly.... gullible doomtard- DEFINITELY |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878 United Kingdom08/17/2012 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm not sure if I think its a good thing, or a sad thing- but melfy has been here less than half the time I have been here, and in that time- I have seen him lie, cheat, and generally showing the lowest of all human characteristics... all in all- pretty much normal STO behaviour as defined by nancys standards-(the ones she uses not the ones she supposedly endorses..) Why does that not surprise me..... |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878 United Kingdom08/17/2012 12:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | you really shouldnt have dredged up that old thread melfy fencesitter??? I confirm now that i am in no way affiliated with anyone paying for debunking. However, I was created with a brain.And over the course of my life i have learned enough that I am confident in saying that i know complete bullshit when i see it. Quoting: aynipuzdog mirrored 285466Here's a thought, lets make up a pretend critter and call it a Beta.The beta's have talked only to me and will only talk through me.You can ask the betas anything you like but they reserve the right to answer only those things that they are smart enough to understand in plain english when its spoken of very slowly.Of course we will say we dont talk to the betas for money.But will offer some crappy burnt cd's for like a nickel apiece(we can buy them at a discount over at the local walmart,cheap.)Eventually we will convince enough people who are dumber than us that Betas are real and they will help to fund us by donating to the Betas in order to get insight on all of the stuff going on in the news.(the news comes in handy.) So who would like to be the first to ask The Betas a question? (nothing to intellectual or provable!) The Betas say that Zetas are just imaginary friends of someone who grew up and was to insecure to let go of.The betas are always right because the Betas have google and know where to go for answers.(www.answers.com). The Betas say have a nice day.And not to buy into such foolishness as Zetas. peace Collective human history is full of aphorisms that assert that the individual needs to LOOK DEEPER to find true meaning and value when confronted with new information, and new pronouncements. "Don't judge a book by it's cover" "Beauty is only skin deep" "Appearances can be deceiving." "Doubt is the beginning, not the end, of wisdom." You might be surprised that I would include this last aphorism, but you shouldn't be. OF COURSE you should "doubt" the words of the Zetas - but more importantly, YOU SHOULD ALSO DOUBT THE WORDS OF THEIR ENEMIES - THE DEBUNKERS. You should have DOUBT on BOTH sides! So much doubt in fact, that your name should be THOMAS. And then --LOOK-- and make up your own mind. There is 3500 pages of ZetaTalk to consider, and the debunkers would have you drink "thier kool-aid" :foolaid: and walk away from the intellectual adventure of a lifetime with one "magic" word: BULLSHIT --DON'T BUY IT-- for then you are acting just as BRAINLESS as the debunkers claim that those who "look" are. LOOK - and make up your "own" mind. So watch for falling cows: :fallcow: and walk in balance. the fence you are supposed to be sitting on fell over and rotted away- and its remains are in another country on the other side of the world... thats your `fence sitting'.... |
| aussie 763624 User ID: 22118878 United Kingdom08/17/2012 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anon ...Actually... I do not think I have formed an opinion yet. Quoting: NightWisp 285172I just wanted to know why someone who hated it so much spent so much time reading it and condemning it. Why waste time with it? If it is not real, it is harmless. Either Mr LonaStranger feels a humanitarian need to warn the public it is a fraud or he is trying to provide disinformation to something which might be true. Which is it? He makes much ado about nothing. In fact, he seems to have an obsession to debunk a nothing. Why? Gezz.....just for you ok. Zetatalk was DEBUNKED FULLY by Ms LIEDer herself.....from the start right up to May 2003. Now if you DO NOT understand this FACT then you are NOT UP WITH THE PLAY. POST 2003 is all about RIDICULE and having ENTERTAINMENT at the expense of the zidiot bonkers and their fearless LIEDer. For the PEOPLE that take ANYTHING of Nancy's F A I L E D doomsday prediction as more than entertainment....so be it. As previously stated....it's their right to DELUSION. This is NOT zetababble.com; so either HANDLE the GLP neighbourhood or :pissoff: back to the Sanctuary of zitatalk.com....that the Bonkers so dearly embrace!! Now let's :partytime: :robots_all: theres two parts from that quote that I feel is pertinant 5 years later Anon ...Actually... I do not think I have formed an opinion yet. Quoting: NightWisp 285172I just wanted to know why someone who hated it so much spent so much time reading it and condemning it. Why waste time with it? If it is not real, it is harmless. Either Mr LonaStranger feels a humanitarian need to warn the public it is a fraud or he is trying to provide disinformation to something which might be true. Which is it? He makes much ado about nothing. In fact, he seems to have an obsession to debunk a nothing. Why? as we have seen over the years, people have lost their families, friends, property and reputations to this shitte- some of those we(as various individuals) knew personally- and as we have seen from the ning- they are STILL losing their families and friends, selling their properties Why waste time with it? If it is not real, it is harmless. Quoting: NightWisp 285172NO, NO, A FUCKING BILLION TIMES FUCKIN NO!!!! just in case you missed it, I `kinda' disagree with this post rather strongly IMHO- its about as harmless as drinking 5 litres of vodka in an hour, while sitting in your car in a closed garage with the engine running, with a pipe from the exhaust running into the cab, while cutting both your wrists and strangling yourself while drinking ratpoison mixed with broken glass.... a strange definition of `harmless' some people have.. (pretty much like some peoples definition of `fence sitting'- or fence shitting as melfy called his own activities on this thread) Gezz.....just for you ok. Zetatalk was DEBUNKED FULLY by Ms LIEDer herself.....from the start right up to May 2003. Now if you DO NOT understand this FACT then you are NOT UP WITH THE PLAY. Quoting: The Lone Ranger POST 2003 is all about RIDICULE and having ENTERTAINMENT at the expense of the zidiot bonkers and their fearless LIEDer. For the PEOPLE that take ANYTHING of Nancy's F A I L E D doomsday prediction as more than entertainment....so be it. As previously stated....it's their right to DELUSION. This is NOT zetababble.com; so either HANDLE the GLP neighbourhood or :pissoff: back to the Sanctuary of zitatalk.com....that the Bonkers so dearly embrace!! Now let's :partytime: :robots_all: thats one of the few things said on that thread thats still applicable today.... wonder who posted it???? |
