Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,742 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 637,821
Pageviews Today: 1,091,307Threads Today: 346Posts Today: 6,841
11:14 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
09/15/2012 07:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Further proof the old broad is stupid, ignorant, or just doesn't know how to use an astronomy program (take your pick):

Flareberto posts an image of the Sun with the following caption:

"2012/09/14 15:43 Az.228° El. 36°"

The old broad comments with this:

"Comment by Nancy Lieder 1 hour ago

Azi 228 and Alt 36? A bit too far to the south by 14 degree and way too high in the sky by 17 degrees! If you have daylight savings time there in Italy, then the Azi is correct but the Alt is still 17 degree too high. The wobble, in force, eh?
"

What? Obviously, she doesn't know how to use Skymaps...

According to Cartes du Ciel configured with Flareberto's exact coordinates, I get this for the Sun at that location and time (time stamp pulled from his image EXIF):

Azimuth: +227° 02' 23"
Altitude: +37° 10' 46"

Now where the hell is she getting too high by 17° and south by 14°?
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
aussie 763624
User ID: 23817398
United Kingdom
09/15/2012 08:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Further proof the old broad is stupid, ignorant, or just doesn't know how to use an astronomy program (take your pick):

Flareberto posts an image of the Sun with the following caption:

"2012/09/14 15:43 Az.228° El. 36°"

The old broad comments with this:

"Comment by Nancy Lieder 1 hour ago

Azi 228 and Alt 36? A bit too far to the south by 14 degree and way too high in the sky by 17 degrees! If you have daylight savings time there in Italy, then the Azi is correct but the Alt is still 17 degree too high. The wobble, in force, eh?
"

What? Obviously, she doesn't know how to use Skymaps...

According to Cartes du Ciel configured with Flareberto's exact coordinates, I get this for the Sun at that location and time (time stamp pulled from his image EXIF):

Azimuth: +227° 02' 23"
Altitude: +37° 10' 46"

Now where the hell is she getting too high by 17° and south by 14°?
 Quoting: bob_909


god only knows- from the LIEder that brought you such classics as ra means right angle...

I would want confirmation if she said 1+1 is 2...

(she never got much beyond that- I do suppose that makes her marginally more intelligent than the `zetas' that never could figure out if you have one apple and someone takes that apple away from you- how many apples do you have...)


zetas still cant answer this question.....
aussie 763624
User ID: 23817398
United Kingdom
09/15/2012 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Further proof the old broad is stupid, ignorant, or just doesn't know how to use an astronomy program (take your pick):
 Quoting: bob_909


can I pick [d]- all of the above???

Flareberto posts an image of the Sun with the following caption:

"2012/09/14 15:43 Az.228° El. 36°"

The old broad comments with this:

"Comment by Nancy Lieder 1 hour ago

Azi 228 and Alt 36? A bit too far to the south by 14 degree and way too high in the sky by 17 degrees! If you have daylight savings time there in Italy, then the Azi is correct but the Alt is still 17 degree too high. The wobble, in force, eh?
"

What? Obviously, she doesn't know how to use Skymaps...

According to Cartes du Ciel configured with Flareberto's exact coordinates, I get this for the Sun at that location and time (time stamp pulled from his image EXIF):

Azimuth: +227° 02' 23"
Altitude: +37° 10' 46"

Now where the hell is she getting too high by 17° and south by 14°?
 Quoting: bob_909

but you have to remember- what the zetas saw in that post is somewhat different to what you and I saw...

we saw

Flareberto posts an image of the Sun with the following caption:

"2012/09/14 15:43 Az.228° El. 36°"
 Quoting: bob_909


zetas saw this post

Flareberto posts an image of the Sun with the following caption:

"212/9/14 15:43 Az.228° El. 36°"
 Quoting: bob_909

and that was posted by bob99 as well..

doh- the zetas even got this post wrong too

According to Cartes du Ciel configured with Flareberto's exact coordinates, I get this for the Sun at that location and time (time stamp pulled from his image EXIF):

Azimuth: +227° 02' 23"
Altitude: +37° 10' 46"
 Quoting: bob_909


You have to remember that these mathematical geniuses that `know' all earth science is wrong

saw this post and nancy replied as per their `zeta babblings'



what the zetas saw posted
According to Cartes du Ciel configured with Flareberto's exact coordinates, I get this for the Sun at that location and time (time stamp pulled from his image EXIF):

Azimuth: +227° 2' 23"
Altitude: +37° 1' 46"
 Quoting: bob_909


and they punched in the year as 1800 years ago too..

(or was that 18 years ago???)


must suck to be a alien species that can wander around the universe, move planets (when they want to)- but cant quite get the concept of a nothing....


or maybe its all in the mind of a frowsy old woman that badly wanted to be important somehow
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 21705985
United States
09/15/2012 10:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Further proof the old broad is stupid, ignorant, or just doesn't know how to use an astronomy program (take your pick):

Flareberto posts an image of the Sun with the following caption:

"2012/09/14 15:43 Az.228° El. 36°"

The old broad comments with this:

"Comment by Nancy Lieder 1 hour ago

Azi 228 and Alt 36? A bit too far to the south by 14 degree and way too high in the sky by 17 degrees! If you have daylight savings time there in Italy, then the Azi is correct but the Alt is still 17 degree too high. The wobble, in force, eh?
"

What? Obviously, she doesn't know how to use Skymaps...

According to Cartes du Ciel configured with Flareberto's exact coordinates, I get this for the Sun at that location and time (time stamp pulled from his image EXIF):

Azimuth: +227° 02' 23"
Altitude: +37° 10' 46"

Now where the hell is she getting too high by 17° and south by 14°?
 Quoting: bob_909

I see the problem - your coordinates have zeros in them. As you know, the "Zetas" don't use zeros.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
aussie 763624
User ID: 23817398
United Kingdom
09/15/2012 10:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Further proof the old broad is stupid, ignorant, or just doesn't know how to use an astronomy program (take your pick):

Flareberto posts an image of the Sun with the following caption:

"2012/09/14 15:43 Az.228° El. 36°"

The old broad comments with this:

"Comment by Nancy Lieder 1 hour ago

Azi 228 and Alt 36? A bit too far to the south by 14 degree and way too high in the sky by 17 degrees! If you have daylight savings time there in Italy, then the Azi is correct but the Alt is still 17 degree too high. The wobble, in force, eh?
"

What? Obviously, she doesn't know how to use Skymaps...

According to Cartes du Ciel configured with Flareberto's exact coordinates, I get this for the Sun at that location and time (time stamp pulled from his image EXIF):

Azimuth: +227° 02' 23"
Altitude: +37° 10' 46"

Now where the hell is she getting too high by 17° and south by 14°?
 Quoting: bob_909

I see the problem - your coordinates have zeros in them. As you know, the "Zetas" don't use zeros.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


`snap'
;-)
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
09/15/2012 04:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...and guess what?

She changed the caption!

The original (which I captured as a PDF):

2012/09/14 15:43 Az.228° El. 36°


After Nancy got to it:

2012/09/14 15:43 Az.228° El. 36° Looking for a Bully's Tail, Inadvertently Catch an Earth Wobble.


Now here's something that's odd - the original caption has a posted day/time of September 14, 2012 at 3:59pm

The new caption: September 14, 2012 at 3:30pm

Am I seeing things or has she access to a way-back machine?

Either that or she has the ability to modify the tags on the ning.
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 21705985
United States
09/15/2012 07:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And yet no sign of a "wobble" in these time lapse videos shot this year:

[link to youtu.be] (August 2012)
[link to youtu.be] (July 2012)
[link to youtu.be]

There's only one thing to say:

zwrong2
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10422385
Canada
09/15/2012 11:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...


Interesting.

So, if election day rolls around, and the announcement STILL hasn't been made, what then, Astrogal50?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I suppose shouldn't have expected an answer. But then again, the inability of the believer TO answer IS an answer in itself, no?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Thread: Damnnnnn Look at HOW MANY VOLCANOES ERUPTING RIGHT NOW

:zright:
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Ah, ZM's usual non-fence sitting nonsequitur. I already know, ZM, that you will continue your senseless reposting of anything you find that you feel somehow supports the idea of Bad Things before 2014...and that when 2014 comes, and PX STILL hasn't shown up, you will continue to promote and believe nonetheless. Your repeated irrationality has been aptly demonstrated on this thread, and you already owe the prediction-jar $20.00, or should I say $30, with this absurd Volcano support?

But I am asking Astrogal50. If her prediction that NASA will not have announced PX by election day fails, will that be enough to convince her that PX doesn't exist, as Nancy describes it, or will she continue to blindly follow the rantings of this particular old lady from Wisconsin?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

She will probably swallow yet another "white lie" and and believe it all when the imaginary zetas extend the date of our destruction further into the future, like "2016 is too far out".
Truther
User ID: 23882526
Germany
09/16/2012 12:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Or like 2020 is too far out? banana2
At least Flareberto always has some nice lense flares for the last brain-dead followers of Nancy Lieder.

This time his Nibiru nearly has the size of the sun. Of course "nobody" could see such a big planet, especially not when it is an odd lense flare. Perhaps they think that their nobiru bought some hotdogs at a fast food restaurant and so he eventually grew a little bit. At least their brains do not have more storage than an average floppy-disk.

Perhaps this is also the kind of annoucement they are waiting for. There is a big planet near our sun which is daily growing because it visits our fast food restaurants regularly.
This poleshit ning page gets more and more a running gag. It is incredible that some people really buy this kind of shit there.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
09/16/2012 02:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...


I suppose shouldn't have expected an answer. But then again, the inability of the believer TO answer IS an answer in itself, no?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Thread: Damnnnnn Look at HOW MANY VOLCANOES ERUPTING RIGHT NOW

:zright:
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Ah, ZM's usual non-fence sitting nonsequitur. I already know, ZM, that you will continue your senseless reposting of anything you find that you feel somehow supports the idea of Bad Things before 2014...and that when 2014 comes, and PX STILL hasn't shown up, you will continue to promote and believe nonetheless. Your repeated irrationality has been aptly demonstrated on this thread, and you already owe the prediction-jar $20.00, or should I say $30, with this absurd Volcano support?

But I am asking Astrogal50. If her prediction that NASA will not have announced PX by election day fails, will that be enough to convince her that PX doesn't exist, as Nancy describes it, or will she continue to blindly follow the rantings of this particular old lady from Wisconsin?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

She will probably swallow yet another "white lie" and and believe it all when the imaginary zetas extend the date of our destruction further into the future, like "2016 is too far out".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10422385


That part, indeed, is what fascinates me. To see exacting parallels to the group profiled in 'When Prophecy Fails' realtime is very interesting, but it's the mindset I want to understand. How wrong is wrong enough? Or is there no limit? Would Nancy's believers be irrational enough to go the Heaven's Gate route, if Nancy demanded it? Or, if not, where would be their 'breaking point' where they would choose not to believe anymore? And why then? What criteria must be met for the believer to 'break up' with the PX belief?

Believers, perhaps not surprisingly, are rather reticent to answer those questions. A pity.
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 1091972
United States
09/16/2012 03:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!


Ah, ZM's usual non-fence sitting nonsequitur. I already know, ZM, that you will continue your senseless reposting of anything you find that you feel somehow supports the idea of Bad Things before 2014...and that when 2014 comes, and PX STILL hasn't shown up, you will continue to promote and believe nonetheless. Your repeated irrationality has been aptly demonstrated on this thread, and you already owe the prediction-jar $20.00, or should I say $30, with this absurd Volcano support?

But I am asking Astrogal50. If her prediction that NASA will not have announced PX by election day fails, will that be enough to convince her that PX doesn't exist, as Nancy describes it, or will she continue to blindly follow the rantings of this particular old lady from Wisconsin?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

She will probably swallow yet another "white lie" and and believe it all when the imaginary zetas extend the date of our destruction further into the future, like "2016 is too far out".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10422385


That part, indeed, is what fascinates me. To see exacting parallels to the group profiled in 'When Prophecy Fails' realtime is very interesting, but it's the mindset I want to understand. How wrong is wrong enough? Or is there no limit? Would Nancy's believers be irrational enough to go the Heaven's Gate route, if Nancy demanded it? Or, if not, where would be their 'breaking point' where they would choose not to believe anymore? And why then? What criteria must be met for the believer to 'break up' with the PX belief?

Believers, perhaps not surprisingly, are rather reticent to answer those questions. A pity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I would GLADLY answer ... if I was a believer.
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
09/16/2012 04:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It's amazing that a lens flare can push it from 7 of 10 to 8 of 10...absolutely pathetic...


Comment by Nancy Lieder 40 minutes ago

And this, Fea, where the Zetas also say that more visibility of PX is part of the 8 of 10

ZetaTalk Prediction 12/4/2010:

This is information that coincides with the 8 of 10 scenarios and with the anticipated position of Planet X vs a vs the Earth for enhanced viewing of Planet X from the astonished residents of Earth.


-----

Gee, I wonder why I can't image planet eX like Flareberto?

Maybe it's because I know how to take images without lens flares!

[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

Shot with an Olympus EPL-1 and Panasonic 45-200mm lens. Black astrosolar filter material.

Image unaltered except to reduce size - no other manipulation and EXIF data is untouched.

Last Edited by bob_909 on 09/16/2012 04:30 PM
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
09/16/2012 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...


Ah, ZM's usual non-fence sitting nonsequitur. I already know, ZM, that you will continue your senseless reposting of anything you find that you feel somehow supports the idea of Bad Things before 2014...and that when 2014 comes, and PX STILL hasn't shown up, you will continue to promote and believe nonetheless. Your repeated irrationality has been aptly demonstrated on this thread, and you already owe the prediction-jar $20.00, or should I say $30, with this absurd Volcano support?

But I am asking Astrogal50. If her prediction that NASA will not have announced PX by election day fails, will that be enough to convince her that PX doesn't exist, as Nancy describes it, or will she continue to blindly follow the rantings of this particular old lady from Wisconsin?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444

She will probably swallow yet another "white lie" and and believe it all when the imaginary zetas extend the date of our destruction further into the future, like "2016 is too far out".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10422385


That part, indeed, is what fascinates me. To see exacting parallels to the group profiled in 'When Prophecy Fails' realtime is very interesting, but it's the mindset I want to understand. How wrong is wrong enough? Or is there no limit? Would Nancy's believers be irrational enough to go the Heaven's Gate route, if Nancy demanded it? Or, if not, where would be their 'breaking point' where they would choose not to believe anymore? And why then? What criteria must be met for the believer to 'break up' with the PX belief?

Believers, perhaps not surprisingly, are rather reticent to answer those questions. A pity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I would GLADLY answer ... if I was a believer.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


I got your answer some time ago, so I wasn't expecting nor hoping for one from you. I would like such a conversation answering those questions from Astrogal, but expect that is not forthcoming.

So you volunteered a comment here about that because...?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
09/16/2012 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It's amazing that a lens flare can push it from 7 of 10 to 8 of 10...absolutely pathetic...


Comment by Nancy Lieder 40 minutes ago

And this, Fea, where the Zetas also say that more visibility of PX is part of the 8 of 10

ZetaTalk Prediction 12/4/2010:

This is information that coincides with the 8 of 10 scenarios and with the anticipated position of Planet X vs a vs the Earth for enhanced viewing of Planet X from the astonished residents of Earth.


-----

Gee, I wonder why I can't image planet eX like Flareberto?

Maybe it's because I know how to take images without lens flares!

[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

Shot with an Olympus EPL-1 and Panasonic 45-200mm lens. Black astrosolar filter material.

Image unaltered except to reduce size - no other manipulation and EXIF data is untouched.
 Quoting: bob_909


Nice!
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 21705985
United States
09/16/2012 05:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I would GLADLY answer ... if I was a believer.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Ah, so being a paid shill for Nancy doesn't mean you have to believe her?
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 21705985
United States
09/16/2012 05:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It's amazing that a lens flare can push it from 7 of 10 to 8 of 10...absolutely pathetic...


Comment by Nancy Lieder 40 minutes ago

And this, Fea, where the Zetas also say that more visibility of PX is part of the 8 of 10

ZetaTalk Prediction 12/4/2010:

This is information that coincides with the 8 of 10 scenarios and with the anticipated position of Planet X vs a vs the Earth for enhanced viewing of Planet X from the astonished residents of Earth.


-----

Gee, I wonder why I can't image planet eX like Flareberto?

Maybe it's because I know how to take images without lens flares!

[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

Shot with an Olympus EPL-1 and Panasonic 45-200mm lens. Black astrosolar filter material.

Image unaltered except to reduce size - no other manipulation and EXIF data is untouched.
 Quoting: bob_909


Very nice.
zwrong2
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
09/16/2012 06:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Gee, I wonder why I can't image planet eX like Flareberto?

Maybe it's because I know how to take images without lens flares!

[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

Shot with an Olympus EPL-1 and Panasonic 45-200mm lens. Black astrosolar filter material.

Image unaltered except to reduce size - no other manipulation and EXIF data is untouched.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Very nice.


If you're interested in how I made the filter, it's a 52 to 58mm step-up ring with a piece of black solar filter material attached to the ring. This results in a filter that is parallel to the front lens element and perpendicular to the light entering the lens. Camera mounted on a tripod because of the slow shutter speed even at ISO 1600.

I don't like the black solar filter material, it's relatively fragile as it is easily scratched even by a paintbrush used to remove dust from the surface.
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
09/16/2012 10:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Pending Announcement - What the Establishment Fears

That's the caption to Nancy's latest post on the ning.

What will Nancy's true believers do when they come to the realization that it's all been a pack of lies?
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
aussie 763624
User ID: 23931769
United Kingdom
09/17/2012 03:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The big problem Bob909, is that she will simply stop mentioning it and it will be forgotten about until someone brings it up (usually a debunker, altho that's a little harder these days than when she was still hosting her chats here rather than the ning- much easier to control what people are allowed to post about there)
Bush was going to make and announcement then Obama was going to make one before he was elected, then there was the one before the Iraq war, where the US and Indonesian governments were going to make an announcement....

Each time when it became obvious that it wasn't going to happen, she simply stops talking about it, bringing up some `new exciting' doom for her followers to panic about...

This has always been her pattern- she used it when the `before Christmas' fireballs didn't appear, when the ISS was going to have to be evacuated due to increased debris from planet `fail's tail was going to cause it to be destroyed, she forgot about the dark twin for several years until someone else brought it up.

See the pattern?
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 1091972
United States
09/17/2012 05:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Pending Announcement - What the Establishment Fears

That's the caption to Nancy's latest post on the ning.

What will Nancy's true believers do when they come to the realization that it's all been a pack of lies?
 Quoting: bob_909


Only a "pack"? You act like it is more akin to a CARTON!

Thread: Best Video of Nibiru Yet

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 09/17/2012 06:43 AM
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 1091972
United States
09/17/2012 06:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I would GLADLY answer ... if I was a believer.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Ah, so being a paid shill for Nancy doesn't mean you have to believe her?
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


alert_2

Just a reminder: WE ARE JUST ***FIVE*** DAYS AWAY FROM THE 2nd PRE-CATACLYSM!!!! (a date endorsed by Clif!)

[link to www.ourtransition.info]
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 21705985
United States
09/17/2012 07:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
alert_2

Just a reminder: WE ARE JUST ***FIVE*** DAYS AWAY FROM THE 2nd PRE-CATACLYSM!!!! (a date endorsed by Clif!)

[link to www.ourtransition.info]
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


TRANSLATION: WE ARE JUST ***FIVE*** DAYS AWAY FROM MAX'S LATEST FAIL!!!!
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 21705985
United States
09/17/2012 07:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Pending Announcement - What the Establishment Fears

That's the caption to Nancy's latest post on the ning.

What will Nancy's true believers do when they come to the realization that it's all been a pack of lies?
 Quoting: bob_909


Only a "pack"? You act like it is more akin to a CARTON!

Thread: Best Video of Nibiru Yet
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


The video is no longer available...sounds like someone realized they were mistaken and took it down.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
09/17/2012 09:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Pending Announcement - What the Establishment Fears

That's the caption to Nancy's latest post on the ning.

What will Nancy's true believers do when they come to the realization that it's all been a pack of lies?
 Quoting: bob_909


Only a "pack"? You act like it is more akin to a CARTON!

Thread: Best Video of Nibiru Yet
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


The video is no longer available...sounds like someone realized they were mistaken and took it down.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


There's a second video and that one shows two lens flares.
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
More about Tunnel-Vision
User ID: 23949800
Germany
09/17/2012 01:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The big problem Bob909, is that she will simply stop mentioning it and it will be forgotten about until someone brings it up (usually a debunker, altho that's a little harder these days than when she was still hosting her chats here rather than the ning- much easier to control what people are allowed to post about there)
Bush was going to make and announcement then Obama was going to make one before he was elected, then there was the one before the Iraq war, where the US and Indonesian governments were going to make an announcement....

Each time when it became obvious that it wasn't going to happen, she simply stops talking about it, bringing up some `new exciting' doom for her followers to panic about...

This has always been her pattern- she used it when the `before Christmas' fireballs didn't appear, when the ISS was going to have to be evacuated due to increased debris from planet `fail's tail was going to cause it to be destroyed, she forgot about the dark twin for several years until someone else brought it up.

See the pattern?
 Quoting: aussie 763624 23931769


Indeed.. she's currently trying to move the attention from the failed 7/10, the "wrong transite" and the failed "COW-punches" with that very announement.

When Obama fails to mention anything she will just point her fingers elsewhere.
The "Council of Worlds" will likely get the blame... or the free-will is another good candidate.

Something like "even though we predicted per 93% that this will happen, X led to Y and this was in the hands of man"

The fervent believers will avoid any conflict to remain in their comfortable world... even though it means Nancy needs to bend her predictions over and over..
More about Tunnel-Vision
User ID: 23949800
Germany
09/17/2012 01:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...

She will probably swallow yet another "white lie" and and believe it all when the imaginary zetas extend the date of our destruction further into the future, like "2016 is too far out".
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10422385


That part, indeed, is what fascinates me. To see exacting parallels to the group profiled in 'When Prophecy Fails' realtime is very interesting, but it's the mindset I want to understand. How wrong is wrong enough? Or is there no limit? Would Nancy's believers be irrational enough to go the Heaven's Gate route, if Nancy demanded it? Or, if not, where would be their 'breaking point' where they would choose not to believe anymore? And why then? What criteria must be met for the believer to 'break up' with the PX belief?

Believers, perhaps not surprisingly, are rather reticent to answer those questions. A pity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I would GLADLY answer ... if I was a believer.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


I got your answer some time ago, so I wasn't expecting nor hoping for one from you. I would like such a conversation answering those questions from Astrogal, but expect that is not forthcoming.

So you volunteered a comment here about that because...?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Maybe I can answer this one as a longtime former Mod.


How wrong is wrong enough?


Unfortunately a lot needs to be wrong.
Once you are so deep in it, the truth could be right before your nose and you would deny it.

In the ZT-Exposed document I mentioned the "Fake-Maria" story.
Maria was a former Moderator and I was pretty good in contact with her. We had skype (webcam) conversations in the past so I knew her.

Anyhow,
After a while she stopped believing ZT and Nancy quickly proclaimed she must be a fake idendity. (According to Nancy, someone from the government to distract the PS-Mods).

I still had Maria added over Facebook and I went to check that ZT claims in more detail.
I started asking questions that only the real Maria could answer, and of course she could answer all of these....
then I went to do another webcam-session and again it was no-one but Maria herself...

What did the Moderators thought of all this?

At first, some of them were seriously confused (because all proved Nancy's claims wrong) but finally they choosed the way of the least resistance and jumped on Nancy's bandwagon who insisted this couldnt be Maria even though I provided the whole skype session and the answers as proof it is herself.

Nancy came up with her regular means of manipulation to let me look bad (calling me "a small bait" or a "young soul") and the rest of the Mods accordingly made it clear to me that any further discussion will lead to a suspension as a Mod.

Someone of them came up with the "brilliant" argument:
"If debunking ZT is not allowed on the PS-Ning, it shouldn't be allowed on the Admin-Ning either".

Which was the end of any further rational discussion. (Even though it never really stopped since I came across her mistakes with the SOHO EIT , the Neumayer images and finally the too obvious Venus-transite claims and discussed this openly on the admin Ning.)




Would someone go in Heaven's gate for ZT?

No doubt. Yes.
In fact there was one former Moderator who made indications in that direction... (Suicidal stuff) and Nancy quickly claimed her another "fake" to let the other Mods avoid any contact with that person.

To my knowledge that person has not yet commited suicide (thank god) and is not directly involved into ZT anymore. ( I guess that saved her life)...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
09/17/2012 01:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...


That part, indeed, is what fascinates me. To see exacting parallels to the group profiled in 'When Prophecy Fails' realtime is very interesting, but it's the mindset I want to understand. How wrong is wrong enough? Or is there no limit? Would Nancy's believers be irrational enough to go the Heaven's Gate route, if Nancy demanded it? Or, if not, where would be their 'breaking point' where they would choose not to believe anymore? And why then? What criteria must be met for the believer to 'break up' with the PX belief?

Believers, perhaps not surprisingly, are rather reticent to answer those questions. A pity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


I would GLADLY answer ... if I was a believer.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


I got your answer some time ago, so I wasn't expecting nor hoping for one from you. I would like such a conversation answering those questions from Astrogal, but expect that is not forthcoming.

So you volunteered a comment here about that because...?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Maybe I can answer this one as a longtime former Mod.


How wrong is wrong enough?


Unfortunately a lot needs to be wrong.
Once you are so deep in it, the truth could be right before your nose and you would deny it.

In the ZT-Exposed document I mentioned the "Fake-Maria" story.
Maria was a former Moderator and I was pretty good in contact with her. We had skype (webcam) conversations in the past so I knew her.

Anyhow,
After a while she stopped believing ZT and Nancy quickly proclaimed she must be a fake idendity. (According to Nancy, someone from the government to distract the PS-Mods).

I still had Maria added over Facebook and I went to check that ZT claims in more detail.
I started asking questions that only the real Maria could answer, and of course she could answer all of these....
then I went to do another webcam-session and again it was no-one but Maria herself...

What did the Moderators thought of all this?

At first, some of them were seriously confused (because all proved Nancy's claims wrong) but finally they choosed the way of the least resistance and jumped on Nancy's bandwagon who insisted this couldnt be Maria even though I provided the whole skype session and the answers as proof it is herself.

Nancy came up with her regular means of manipulation to let me look bad (calling me "a small bait" or a "young soul") and the rest of the Mods accordingly made it clear to me that any further discussion will lead to a suspension as a Mod.

Someone of them came up with the "brilliant" argument:
"If debunking ZT is not allowed on the PS-Ning, it shouldn't be allowed on the Admin-Ning either".

Which was the end of any further rational discussion. (Even though it never really stopped since I came across her mistakes with the SOHO EIT , the Neumayer images and finally the too obvious Venus-transite claims and discussed this openly on the admin Ning.)




Would someone go in Heaven's gate for ZT?

No doubt. Yes.
In fact there was one former Moderator who made indications in that direction... (Suicidal stuff) and Nancy quickly claimed her another "fake" to let the other Mods avoid any contact with that person.

To my knowledge that person has not yet commited suicide (thank god) and is not directly involved into ZT anymore. ( I guess that saved her life)...
 Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 23949800


I appreciate your insights, and you have been very candid in explaining how you came to 'break up' with Nancy's cult. It may be that such breaking points are unique to the believer/individual in question, and there's no way to come up with a true 'goal post' that would work for everyone addicted to Nancy's claims. Certainly her plethora of past failures didn't end her cult.

The idea that anyone would hold onto Nancy's ideas with Heaven's Gate-like fervor is troubling, particularly given the quality of those ideas is terribly low. But, then, so was the Heaven's Gate idea itself, I suppose.

Be well, and thank you for replying. And keep on keeping on.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10372663
United States
09/17/2012 01:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hey Dr. Astro howsabout some more killer pics from your telescope? Pretty please!!!


WOW the pretty please felt strange.
More about Tunnel-Vision
User ID: 23949800
Germany
09/17/2012 04:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I appreciate your insights, and you have been very candid in explaining how you came to 'break up' with Nancy's cult. It may be that such breaking points are unique to the believer/individual in question, and there's no way to come up with a true 'goal post' that would work for everyone addicted to Nancy's claims. Certainly her plethora of past failures didn't end her cult.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Correct.
This can go deep enough as that only YOU can convince yourself of smth. being otherwise.

Making "reality" more obvious certainly helps awakening but probably there are harder states of denial aswell.. so at the end its totally up to the individual and this is were the Mods are currently, I believe.

A true "goal post" was something I tried with my doc until I realized that I cannot brake these mental-barriers that some people have set up to themselves, but it worked to a good extend for some and I know at least a handful of people who significantly changed their minds/lifes in accordance. - Yes the "break point" is definetly very individual.


The idea that anyone would hold onto Nancy's ideas with Heaven's Gate-like fervor is troubling, particularly given the quality of those ideas is terribly low. But, then, so was the Heaven's Gate idea itself, I suppose.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Yes, it is troublesome and dangerous.
I know of at least one example were someone intended to do something stupid in order to bring "ZT into the News"...

And if someone imagines this to an extreme then it might turn out to be a real threat.

Nancy does not call for these things, (I guess she even dislikes the idea because it could bring very bad attention to her cult), but some people just go on their own and start to get outta control in this regard.

Fortunately the mindset is not as radical (in terms of self-destroying, martyrdom, or harming others) as other ideologies on this planet..but still it is very destructive in terms of social contacts, social position, state of mind and future plans.

In that, anyone who counters her disinfo is truely doing a great service for their fellow man.

Be well, and thank you for replying. And keep on keeping on.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


Cheers. :) It is very intriguing for me aswell. I suspected Nancy would be thrown out weeks ago but I encountered unforseen hurdles (somehow I cant touch em :P )..

All in its proper time.. the poleshift may encounter a poleshift.
Hydra

User ID: 23933313
Germany
09/17/2012 09:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
A question to the old-timer here:

It seems there is a successor of Nancy Lieder: Daersoulkeeper

The creme de la creme of the Nibirutards.

At the moment three "Niburu is near" threads:
Thread: PROOF and History of Wormwood, Nibiru, Hercolubus, The dragon, Planet X, Hidden Message in movie BABYLON AD - New VIDEO
Thread: i swear i saw wormwood last 2:30-3 am in my telescope - massachusetts
Thread: Planet X Visible to the world on the 17th admitted by TPTB

Deletes every post that proves him wrong and if the poster is a registered member bans him.

E.g.
Thread: i swear i saw wormwood last 2:30-3 am in my telescope - massachusetts

Someone mentioned, Daersoulkeeper saw Jupiter.
Daersoulkeeper: I know where Venus and Jupiter are. It's not Venus or Jupiter.
Netxt day she/he deleted the post and corrected his post to: I know where Venus is. It's not Venus.


Any idea how to handle this?

Is it possible to make a thread "Daersoulkeepers PlanetX/Nibiru - uncesored" or would this regarded as "Abusive post/thread"?




.
:ase26122019:
Annular Solar Eclipse - December 26, 2019 - Kannur, Kerala, India





GLP