Quoting: Menow 18943200 Quoting: MoreAboutTunnelVision
It is incredible but the nobrainers on the ning are really discussing whether there are rats on the mars. Quoting: Truther 27442743
Nancy Lieder could tell them that there are lions and jungles on the mars and they would believe it. So rats eating sand is no big surprise for some Simpletons who try to discover planets with smart phones and floppy-discs.
How could these poor people get sooooo lost? They live their life in a very bad Scifi-story for absolute beginners.
Maybe they should start with wether it has an atmosphere or not... and then what it consists of..
In case... it consists of 95.3% CO2, 2.7%N , 1.6%Ar, 1300ppm O2, 800 ppm CO and 210 ppm H2O...
Then there is the question of how these rats manage temperatures from -133°C, an average of -55°C and max. temps about +27°C?
I guess these rats must be respiring... ahem... CO2 and have some kind of extra-thick skin??
Oh wait. Nancy's rats doesn't oblique the physical world..
Simple... they don't accept that Mars doesn't have an atmosphere. They will accept NASA images of alleged rats, but selectively reject anthing from NASA that doesn't align with whatever Nancy says. It's bizarre, but true.
They see want they want to see.
Whatever Nancy will proclaim as "per the Zetas" will directly be adopted into their belief without questioning it.
If Nancy says there are rats on mars, they'll believe it.
If Nancy says there is another species living deep in the earth's crust, they'll believe it.
If Nancy says Indonesia has sunk more than 20feet, they'll believe it.
If Nancy says Earth is stopped in its Orbit, they'll believe it.
If Nancy says PX can be seen through a floppy but not through a telescope, they.....
If Nancy says Planet X passed the earth without a poleshift and nobody noticed, they'll believe it
Bizarre indeed. Thats what someone gets when he fully relies upon someone elses interpretations.
btw: great to have you back ;)