Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,552 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 206,610
Pageviews Today: 276,522Threads Today: 100Posts Today: 1,096
02:19 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Poster Handle Menow
Post Content
...


I don't give a wank - you just keep putting your foot in your mouth and pushing!

quote
THERE WAS 10TH PLANET IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM, ORBITING AROUND THE SUN, THE ORBIT OF WHICH WAS LOCATED BETWEEN THE ORBITS OF MARS & JUPITER. THAT IS 260 MILLION MILES AWAY FROM THE SUN. THIS WAS EXPLODED BY SOME UNKNOWN NUCLEAR EXPLOSION AND DEBRIS SCATTERED IN SPACE AND REVOLVE AROUND THE SUN IN FORM OF ASTEROIDS 65 MILLION YEARS AGO. (3) THE FIRST MAN OR MAN LIKE SPECIES APPEARED ON THE PLANET EARTH 65 MILLION YEARS AGO. (4) METEORITE DESTINED FROM ASTEROID BELT OBSERVED HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE PROVE 10TH PLANET EXPLODED BY NUCLEAR EXPLOSION 65 MILLION YEARS AGO.
end quote
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36537467


...


Also 15 references to "11th PLANET".
 Quoting: Menow 17887948


quote
THERE WAS 10TH PLANET IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM, ORBITING AROUND THE SUN, THE ORBIT OF WHICH WAS LOCATED BETWEEN THE ORBITS OF MARS & JUPITER. THAT IS 260 MILLION MILES AWAY FROM THE SUN. THIS WAS EXPLODED BY SOME UNKNOWN NUCLEAR EXPLOSION AND DEBRIS SCATTERED IN SPACE AND REVOLVE AROUND THE SUN IN FORM OF ASTEROIDS 65 MILLION YEARS AGO. (3) THE FIRST MAN OR MAN LIKE SPECIES APPEARED ON THE PLANET EARTH 65 MILLION YEARS AGO. (4) METEORITE DESTINED FROM ASTEROID BELT OBSERVED HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE PROVE 10TH PLANET EXPLODED BY NUCLEAR EXPLOSION 65 MILLION YEARS AGO.
end quote
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36537467


Maybe this is true AC 36537467 and the 10th planet was destroyed which leaves the 11th planet left, now beeing the 10th? Who knows.
 Quoting: Panta Rhei


Astronomers know.

The following list (plus the book from 1869 -> "Force and Nature" by Charles Frederick Winslow, M.D. on google books) is what Nancy should have read to understand the subject and make a story out of it, to my understanding, I must say:

The table under this link -> [link to strepulsion.org] indicates the period between the last publication of Navin K. Shah in "|26-04-88|THE NEW UNIVERSAL LAW" before 1998. Remember: the Zetas stepped in on the 1st September 1995

But when I go through some of the postings on this thread Nancy lacks any basic understanding of any astrophysics to any degree, as some of you say.

She must have changed or altered the theory because if you read what Navin K. Shah says it does not fit "exactly" to what "Nancy" said about it.
How did she manage to read all those articles? Did she have access to these kind of information without the WWW? Did she read the book from 1869, "Force and Nature" by Charles Frederick Winslow, M.D.?

Repulsion Force -> [link to www.zetatalk.com]
Escape Velosity -> [link to www.zetatalk.com]
Summary of "Repulsion Force" somewhere in 1998 -> [link to www.zetatalk.com]

And when she finally stole Navin K. Shah's brilliant idea she wouldn't be sued for stealing this stuff and making it up?
 Quoting: Panta Rhei


So you are suggesting that Nancy DIDN'T get the idea from previous sources? The CLAIM being made on Nancy's ning is that there WERE no references previous to Nancy in 1995. I see you ignored that.

"Brilliant idea". What is supposedly brilliant about it?
 Quoting: Menow 36976835


I don't know where the ning says that

there WERE no references previous to Nancy in 1995
 Quoting: Menow 36976835

 Quoting: Panta Rhei


It's quoted on this very thread. Maybe they just said it here.

Note: No response to: "Brilliant idea". What is supposedly brilliant about it?
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP