Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Panta -- what evidence can you imagine that would lead you to conclude that PX, as described by Nancy, doesn't exist?

How long are you willing to give Nancy the benefit of the doubt until you can provisionally conclude she is incorrect?

If nothing Nancy predicts (Obama announcement, Debunkers disappearing, PX plainly visible in sky) occurs by the end of this year, will you still believe Nancy?

If so, how about 2014?

If so, how long must Nancy's predictions fail to occur before you can provisionally conclude she is incorrect?

And another question:

How does the "Planet X" of the Turrialba videos fit with the "Planet X" photos of Alberto Cardin?
(For those not familiar with that name: Flareberto.)

.

This is excellent;

[link to website.lineone.net]

just freaking wow!!! Believing that zeta talk is valid form of reality, what part is so hard to understand its all made up from the inside of that crazy lady's brain she is clearly suffering from schizophrenia classic syptoms of delusions and hallucinations. There is no reason to communicate with humans of this earth, humans are not worthy,just maybe in another 1000 years of more but not definitely with a sick old lady with thoughts of grandiose delusions.

So, what's this? Summer 2013 as yet the latest date from ZetaTalk?

Funny how NO believer has answered those questions - EVER.

Cool...another failure is just a few months away. Can't wait to see what her excuse is come Fall.



Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 03/30/2013 03:16 PM

and....


SNAP

Nancy never learns. How many failed dates have there been since 1995?

Can I borrow your fingers and toes ?, I've ran out of digits.

Indeed.

Sad, too.

I think that this must have been provided purely for amusement......

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Notice Astro's mention...!

Gerard -
The Establishment deliberately covered up the presence of Planet X since at least 1983.


quote (1983)
So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a
nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that
it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the
light cast by its stars ever gets through.

"All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is," Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief
scientist for California's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory
for the California Institute of Technology, said in an interview.
end quote

Gerard

2. Only ZetaTalk has a prediction and accuracy track record bar none.


True, most people get predictions right some of the times, Nancy can't win a trick - accuracy 100% FAIL!

The ZetaTalk Newsletter
Issue 73, Sunday April 13, 2008
Seeking Planet X -> [link to www.zetatalk.com]

[While the IRAS team struggled to explain just what they had found, they were quick to point out that it was not "incoming mail". But how could they say that if they didn't know quite what it was? The quick assurance that the discovery was not "inbound" was a clue that panic was just under the surface. The fear was that the public would panic and make demands on the government, and thus a cover-up was quickly put into place. All talk of the true purpose of the Pioneer probes and those perturbations on outer planets that had been observed for centuries was halted. ]

Still haven't found an original thought of your own? Right.


Duh. It was observed to be light years away and not moving towards us, just not precisely what it was.


Or maybe the assurance was given because it was true.

And for good measure, resort to making things up.

Panta, you need to pedal your wares elsewhere; it's becoming inordinately boring reading. All it is worth is debunking which even my granddaughter could do. If you want to believe go ahead and do so. Surely it's obvious by your increasingly accelerated loss of membership numbers that ignorance and cultism is a choice. One that we are free not to make.

My dearly departed father had a saying;

You can fool some of the people all of the time,
you can fool all of the people some of the time
But you can't fool all of the people all of the time.

Thread: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

But, dear Panta, you're not discussing anything; simply copying & pasting.

prof-rabbit nli 37182787 requested that link, no need to "discuss", just read with an opened mind and your heart.

I read that back in the 90s when Internet sensationalism was in it's infancy; when it was more conducive to manipulation than now. These days there are increasing amounts of verifiable data available with which to seek one's own truth, should one have the motivation to do so, which, personally, I do. There will always be those that can't or won't and these will continue to be manipulated by those with meglomanic tendencies; this, in my mind, is wrong and unacceptable behaviour which I will continue to speak out against as long as I am able.

Their narcissism and ignorance knows no bounds.

Yes,

Alexander McClure attributes the quote to Abraham Lincoln in his 1901 book Lincoln's Own Yarns and Stories.


It does seem however than you can fool a ning-tard anytime...

The culttard keeps on spamming the thread with his old Zetababble. You don`t need an open mind for reading this bullshit, you must have lost your mind to even copy that garbage.

These texts are incredible old and only show how many of Nancy`s crazy predictions failed.

It looks like this culttard is another Zetaspambot, brainwashed and his head deep in Nancy`s ass. Nobody wants to read that crazy cultbabble here. This is no cultpage.

Above are some facts you can rely on.

I made no request for that link, I already know Gerard has the nett common sense of a dolt. You on the other hand have even less.

When it comes to I.Q. points, you lose them every time you go to the bathroom. If you were any more stupid you would photosynthesise in sunlight, perhaps you do anyway.

It's pointless to make fun of you because it will take you the rest of the day to figure it out.

If you see a dust cloud far away in the desert, you may not be able to recognice if it is a car, a pickup or a truck - but sure as hell you can see if it's incoming.



A good example, how Nancy twists the news to fit her crazy ideas.



"There are no discrepancies in the trajectories of any space probes such as Pioneer 10, Pioneer 11, Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 that can be attributed to the gravitational pull of a large undiscovered object in the outer Solar System."
Littmann (1990), p. 204

You see, that the quote is from 1990 - 5 years before Nancy came up with her PX crap?

.

He will occasionally stumble over the truth, but just as quickly pick himself up and carry on as if nothing happened, that is the lot of the ning tard.

LOL! Hillarious that post of "Why You Should Trust ZetaTalk Above All Others"
[link to poleshift.ning.com]


Logical fallacy - not an argument.
It is irrelevant who the information is coming from as it changes nothing of the facts presented.
Quality not quantity.


Yes just like they obviously (successfully) predicted Earth is stopped in its Orbit,
Venus is caught is some cup,
Indonesia underwater,
Poleshift in 2003...
etc etc..

in other words: An accuracy track record of 0% bar none.



Logical fallacy - no argument.
Just because some people call out Nancy for being a Fraud doesn't make her more confirmative!
Its proof how self-inflated her ego is to even consider that as an argument.



This is not an argument unless this actually occured.
How can you use something in the future, not yet happened, not even hints about it, as proof for the present?
PS-Ning logic I guess.



Nope. See "Man from PlanetX" or "Zaccharia/Stichins" pseudoscientific BS.
Although proof of her self-inflated ego again.



Unless you can't provide any proof - not an argument.
Also, what does the establishment has that amateur astronomers don't?
There's no Planet X.



Correctly? Nope.
Where is that proof that PX entered the solar system in 2003 then? Please?
BTW: While you're digging for it, also dig out that proof that earth is halted...


What earth changes?
Earthquakes aren't increasing, there's no indefinite proof of an approaching planet...
Signs in the sky? You mean lenseflares? Flareberto's Planet Exe?




Big Foot? Source?
Also if "ZetaTalk" allegedly discovered new science, how is it they don't even understand current (most basic) science?



There's no Earth Wobble unless you prove it.
There's no relation between a Planet and weather, drought, collapsing buildings, etc UNTIL YOU PROVE IT.
So far, its just a confirmation-bias.

Also, may bother to show me some statistics showing that "exponential increase in earthquakes and volcanoes"??
Then why do you claim such a BS?




Yes... very consistent... see Earth halted, Venus off, "Earth wobble", daily flareberto's flare yet nobody can see it...

Very consistent indeed.
Again,
quality not quantity.





Nice try Gerard... next time kick-start your brain and really start to think about some contras instead of such a onesided-opinion you copy n pasted.

2. Disagreeing discussion is not allowed.

3. The basic concepts deeply lack data to back it up. (Including the Pros above)

4. 99% of ZetaTalk is based on "belief"

5. Believers are not able for rational dicussion.

6. Disagreeing facts are considered wrong in some way.

7. ZetaTalk is blindly believed because it is supposed to be 100% accurate, eliminating every possibility
of natural critique.

8. Nancy keeps fearmongering while Point 3 is still apparent.

9....




Its such a shame that naive people get served such un unbalanced report by the Moderators who've just become suck-puppets to Nancy parroting all her alleged positive attributes and avoid the negative...

If you're not able for rational thought. Quit it. Close it.. because you are misleading people.
Presenting speculation as arguments,
alleged facts, although none of them have been proven,
telling your master is to be trusted while there's clear indication not to - that is.

Last Edited by MoreAboutTunnelVision on 03/31/2013 10:13 AM