...
That would imply, that I regard the poleshit.ning as a cult.
Would you please be so kind, to show me where I characterised the poleshit.ning as a cult.
And your evidence, that I am a shill is?
Oh wait, I am. - Definition of shill: someone who don't agree with you.
Quoting: Hydra Well if not to discourage Cult behavior, why the seeming obsession with Nancy Lieder and zetatalk?? Please elucidate for me Hydra!!
How do you define "obsession?
Oh, I see:
... Here are some of your thread titles Hydra....
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41604005 Eight or so threads in two years = obsession?
A little deeper look would reveal, that from my 2,800 posts may be 10 percent are dedicated to Poleshit-Nancy.
Apparently your "research for obsession" was somewhat biased - but what else to expect from a ning-tard.
Obsessed much, just look at you signiture, dedicated to none other than..... You guessed it... Poleshift ning :D
Quoting: Kiwi AC 41604005 Dedicated to "The sun is off tards", "The moon is off tards" and "The earth is off tards".
And there are lots of it, like Marshal Masters, Denise Chavaz Dimwit, ... - Poleshit-Nancy is just one of them.
You do pay to post here ...
Quoting: Kiwi AC 41604005 I also pay for a cinema or theater ticket, for concerts and a lot of other entertaining things.
Another thing I think it is important to clarify.... Do you believe in the existence of shills or disinformists on internet message boards (simple question)?? And if your answer is yes, what criteria would you use to distinguish such posters?? Please do tell
Quoting: Kiwi AC 41604005 Yes - and per your wikipedia definition, you are one of them.
"Disinformation is intentionally false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately. For this reason, it is synonymous with and sometimes called black propaganda. It is an act of deception and false statements to convince someone of untruth. Disinformation should not be confused with misinformation, information that is unintentionally false.
Unlike traditional propaganda techniques designed to engage emotional support, disinformation is designed to manipulate the audience at the rational level by either discrediting conflicting information or supporting false conclusions. A common disinformation tactic is to mix some truth and observation with false conclusions and lies, or to reveal part of the truth while presenting it as the whole (a limited hangout).
Another technique of concealing facts, or censorship, is also used if the group can affect such control. When channels of information cannot be completely closed, they can be rendered useless by filling them with disinformation, effectively lowering their signal-to-noise ratio and discrediting the opposition by association with many easily disproved false claims."
[
link to en.wikipedia.org]
It's up to you, to prove, that the people you call shills here
* provide false statements to convince someone of untruth
* discredit conflicting information or support false conclusions
* mix some truth and observation with false conclusions and lies
* reveal part of the truth while presenting it as the whole
* conceal or censor facts
* fill channels of information with disinformation
* discredit the opposition by false claims
Your turn, ning-tard.
.
