Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

You cloned me!

Huh? Barycentric motion is the motion of all the objects about the solar systems center of mass. The main influences are the Sun and Jupiter. The barycenter is just outside the surface of the Sun. Since the orbital period of Jupiter is about 12 years, the Sun orbits the barycenter once every 12 years.

The grand solar minimum is a hypothesized future minimum in solar activity similar to the Maunder Minimum around 1650 - 1700. It represents a disruption of the sunspot cycle.

Since total solar irradiance measures show that since 1975 the sunspot cycle represents a 1 W/m^2 variation in the total solar irradiance out of a mean of 1366 W/m^2. This is a 0.07% variation between solar min and solar max. We cannot perceive with our eyes a 0.07% variation.

ZT from 07/13/2013

SOZT
As we predicted would occur during the 8 of 10 phase, visibility of the Planet X complex has increased. As we have explained, Planet X and the Earth assume a more side-by-side posture during the 8 of 10 phase, Planet X moving forward in its path but the Earth pulling far to the left where it is trapped within the cup. Visibility increases because the angle of bounce for sunlight reflected off the vast dust cloud that shrouds both Planet X and the Moon Swirls is more optimal. When the Planet X complex was positioned more between the Earth and Sun, the bounce most often returned sunlight to the Sun or to the side, off into space. It was the rare times when the angle was right, at sunrise or sunset, that the people of Earth saw what they thought were two suns rising or setting. Now this optimal angle is present for most of the day.

Video captures, by experts who adjust the hue to explore what appears under various light spectrums, have begun appearing on the Internet, asserting that a large object can be seen under the Sun or somewhat to the right or left of this position. The objects look spherical, distinct, implying they are planets rather than Moon Swirls. Are any of these objects the Planet X corpus itself? During the decade that Planet X has been in the inner solar system, slowly making its way past the Sun, Planet X has presented many faces, including the Monster Persona where it looks huge and perfectly round. This is caused by light fanning outward but then being drawn back by the gravity of Earth. Where the Monster is not the size of Planet X, the light rays originate FROM Planet X, thus documenting its current location just under the Ecliptic.

Some of the recent captures are of Moon Swirls, so extremely bright (as has been their characteristic) that in one case a video captured a lens flare from the Moon Swirl. Thus proving the Moon Swirl is distinct, not in and of itself a Moon Swirl. What will this increased visibility mean for the lingering cover-up, not yet dealt a death blow as of today, July 13, 2013 by Obama’s planned announcement. This visibility has created increased chatter on the Internet, a growing sense in the public that they are being lied to about the erratic weather, sudden tides, and Sun and Moon obviously out of place. After the announcement, there will be many who will claim Nibiru, aka Planet X, is a falsehood, still in denial or attempting to placate mankind so they remain on the coastlines and in their jobs. This visibility is thus a great weapon against that type of disinformation.
EOZT

ZT from 07/13/2013

SOZT
As we predicted would occur during the 8 of 10 phase, visibility of the Planet X complex has increased. As we have explained, Planet X and the Earth assume a more side-by-side posture during the 8 of 10 phase, Planet X moving forward in its path but the Earth pulling far to the left where it is trapped within the cup. Visibility increases because the angle of bounce for sunlight reflected off the vast dust cloud that shrouds both Planet X and the Moon Swirls is more optimal. When the Planet X complex was positioned more between the Earth and Sun, the bounce most often returned sunlight to the Sun or to the side, off into space. It was the rare times when the angle was right, at sunrise or sunset, that the people of Earth saw what they thought were two suns rising or setting. Now this optimal angle is present for most of the day.

Video captures, by experts who adjust the hue to explore what appears under various light spectrums, have begun appearing on the Internet, asserting that a large object can be seen under the Sun or somewhat to the right or left of this position. The objects look spherical, distinct, implying they are planets rather than Moon Swirls. Are any of these objects the Planet X corpus itself? During the decade that Planet X has been in the inner solar system, slowly making its way past the Sun, Planet X has presented many faces, including the Monster Persona where it looks huge and perfectly round. This is caused by light fanning outward but then being drawn back by the gravity of Earth. Where the Monster is not the size of Planet X, the light rays originate FROM Planet X, thus documenting its current location just under the Ecliptic.

Some of the recent captures are of Moon Swirls, so extremely bright (as has been their characteristic) that in one case a video captured a lens flare from the Moon Swirl. Thus proving the Moon Swirl is distinct, not in and of itself a Moon Swirl. What will this increased visibility mean for the lingering cover-up, not yet dealt a death blow as of today, July 13, 2013 by Obama’s planned announcement. This visibility has created increased chatter on the Internet, a growing sense in the public that they are being lied to about the erratic weather, sudden tides, and Sun and Moon obviously out of place. After the announcement, there will be many who will claim Nibiru, aka Planet X, is a falsehood, still in denial or attempting to placate mankind so they remain on the coastlines and in their jobs. This visibility is thus a great weapon against that type of disinformation.
EOZT

Ironically I was thinking that Nancy could never progress to the "8/10" because her 7/10 would have to manifest in the very first place given she claimed the aliens could delay but not prevent the movements that sooner or later would have to take place.

But who cares about consistency over there anyway?
Or who would even dare to question her?

Forget about the EU-Tsunami, SA quakes, NM-fault, widening of Gibraltar, sinking of indonesia /australia because the 8/10 just arrived!!

Cool, another no-show in Zetaland... (facepalm)
:dramaticat:

ZT from 07/13/2013

SOZBB*
...
EOZBB*

This thread is full of psycho deranged shills!!!

All the tsunamis (Does anybody still remember the hoax with the European tsunami?), all the catastrophies and all the sinking countries were a fantasy horror movie for some lost cultist who really believed into that crapola. Well, of course Nancy claimed that many countries sank but you can easily verify these lies by travelling there. Everybody can enjoy his vacation and spare time in the so called “under water areas”. But of course cultists don`t travel. They are waiting for the latest hoaxes of LIEDer.

So she presented them 40 minutes of lenseflares – embarrassing ones – as a proof of the beginning of the 8 of 10. If you take a closer look at all these different lenseflares you will easily see that they`re all bogus. One of those Nobeeryous seems to be even directly over the clouds. Wow, it must be really near now.

But for the last few cultists – most of them luckily left this weird cult – some bad youtube-clips are the ultimate proof of their crapola. And now it shall even be visible every day,-if you use shitty cams or smartphones with all kinds of funny foils in front of the lense. Welcome in lenseflare heaven.

But please avoid telescopes or high quality cams because then the 8 of 10 will end in a 0 of 10.

IMAGE ( [link to 4.bp.blogspot.com] )



An by the way: Special thanks to the one out there who paid for my account.

Hello my lovely,

I'll look for the full article again, it's incredibly interesting though pretty much over my head! Hope you're well :)

I posted the above on another thread and would be grateful for any thoughts on this subject ie solar barycentric dynamics in relation to grand/prolonged minima. It's interesting stuff! I'll post the Cambridge journal link too although the site is currently unavailable is should be up & running again soon.

[link to journals.cambridge.org]

So true m8.

But please avoid telescopes or high quality cams because then the 8 of 10 will end in a 0 of 10.

I posted the above on another thread and would be grateful for any thoughts on this subject ie solar barycentric dynamics in relation to grand/prolonged minima. It's interesting stuff! I'll post the Cambridge journal link too although the site is currently unavailable is should be up & running again soon.

[link to journals.cambridge.org]

8 out 10 delicious rum drinks that sloshed like tsunami's walking down to your pc/ipad/laptop. The only sinking feeling is when you sobered up. YouTube lens flare videos are great entertainment dude stating its not a lensflare, alot of cameras today reflect lots of light since the curvature and refraction of lens distortion is greater in todays cameras also multiple lens. However that being said these flareball fools say other wise, my favorite lens flare device is the 3ds nintendo camera, scandalous hours of terrorizing your nutbeerooh believers, one look of my nutbeerooh pics on my patented 3ds nintendo they need to change their shorts.

Group consensus..... Let the group set each other "straight" in case anyone has "doubts".

Its a trap guys.

Even though you feel attacked, don't forget that we're talking about facts here - Facts that Nancy cannot explain.

Its up to you though... I can understand if you want to remain ignorant and rather have that fuzzy feeling of being on the right track..
Been there, done that. But eventually you will have to face the hard truth.



Ditto.
The fact that the Nibbytards assume they'll find such a planet on amateur-equip but not on any appropiate tech speaks volumes (about dissonance).


Interesting... Is the full article available somewhere?