I'd be interested to hear how you concluded that Nancy consciously knows she is lying. I have always though that she believes what she says, regardless of how impossible that might seem.
Quoting: Menow 2913051 From my experiences as a Moderator.
Namely when she started to delete discussions on the admin-ning where I and others concluded ZetaTalk was wrong, clearly to avoid the others of reading this info.
Or on another occasion (the Maria-story, detailed in my doc), she was actively trying to discredit my person and turn me into a perpetrator to suggest the others that I was "bad" just for questioning her claims, aside from the fact that I proved that Maria was not a blackOps by a live-video, yet Nancy tried to suggest her other Moderators that Maria was still an "actor" in very bizzare ways. (She even provided bits of it in the "disgruntled Moderator" posting, claiming Marias teeth are different, yet it shows a one-to-one match, clearly showing it was indeed Maria and not a BlackOps despite Nancy's claims.)
Or generally when you question her, she will get angry quite quickly and try to discredit you and let you look foolish, naive etc. (logical fallacies).
Or the way how she discredited Moderators who became "uneasy" and quickly declared them as "BlackOps" to get rid of them.
Now I'd be interested how in your opinion someone who considers himself "service-to-other" and believing it would react in such ways which are extremly typical for people who are confronted with their lies and unwilling to admit them?
I can understand if this is not convincing to outsiders, but if you ask people who have directly worked with her it appears to be the general consensus of which I fully agree.
