9/11 Pentagon was a sham !!! new vid from CIT puts official story to bed.

your plane at 500mph an inch off the ground is what is idiotic..light pole in the Matrix cab...lol...idiotic...
the damage at the pentagon is staged...exit hole... that sir... idiotic..

Even the 9/11 commissioners said the investigation was shit.

there was a plane, but it did not hit the pentagon, something else did it.

Hmmm… let’s see:

1. Cherry pick eyewitnesses who contradict the official account
2. Claim their accounts “prove” there is a Government conspiracy.
3. When an eyewitness claims they’ve seen the airplane hit the Pentagon when they could not have from their vantage point, use this discrepancy as “evidence” that the airplane flew over the Pentagon.
4. ?
5. Profit??

shill?

Yup.

They spent more money investigating the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

I wonder why.

Of course. It just flew off across the beltway and nobody noticed it. I dunno...maybe they turned off the navigation lights!

release all the videos

I personnaly believe it was staged with military holographic technology and pyrotechnics.

Are you Lloyd England ? why don't you figure ?? ...duh Reagan Airport...you make it sound like everyone that lives in the area are always fixated on the Pentagon and air traffic like it's Mecca..OHMMMM>>>FFS !! most folks didn't see shit...vantage points...highway detour...president Bushes extra 9/10 ss...a plane an inch off the ground at 500...impossible...fake gate cam of who knows what they were trying to do there...the only wedge remodled...exit hole lol..
You obviously did not watch the movie...that is why a second plane story was circulated...to cover anyone saying anything about a plane going over or banking off...you dont think the CIA can control a few dozen witness reports? lolz..

for the kids...

Teh plane cannot be on the North side of the Citgo gas station and do the damage that was done to the pentagon...It is aeronauticaly impossible.

No one - not even CIT - has yet come up with a plausible reason why the 9/11 perps would go to the bother and risk of blowing up street lights so as to lay down a false trail and yet have the real (?) Flight 77 fly over the Pentagon when the remote control technology was already available then to fly the plane into the Pentagon. It is no good to say "because they wanted the real plane to be spotted so as to confirm the bogus, official story about hijackers." Why didn't they just fly the thing remotely into the Pentagon?

The sad part about it is that anyone with half a brain could have deduced that there was no plane at the Pentagon just by watching the news report about it.

The tipper would have been when viewing wreckage at the Pentagon and noticing that THERE WAS NO PLANE.

But no we can't use our God-given powers of logic and reason. We need an OFFICIAL source to tell us what the truth is!!!

If anyone cares enough to really look into these things.

The truth is that we are not being told the truth.PERIOD.

That much is sure.

A year ago i would have dismissed everything as well, you live and learn.

All this crap is happening in order to go global.

In order to have global policies the powers that be need the people of the globe to be close in living standards to do so.

Jobs are not coming back unless you go to work for the government.

Just my opinions after much time looking into things.

Ever wonder what makes the leaders come out and talk about universal healthcare, global economy and things that have nothing to do with looking out for just the USA first and foremost?

They are thinking big these days, the US only is not their main concern.

There is a lot wrong with your post.

I could point-by-point show you the evidence that absolutely proves it could not have been flight 77 (a Boeing 757). I could also show compelling evidence that it was in fact an A-4 Skyhawk fighter jet, remotely controlled. However, I will not bother now because it would take too long and you would likely dismiss it without due consideration. The information is available on GLP and many other places if you choose to do real research into the truth.

Nevertheless, I will quickly point out why they could not 'simply fly a jet into the pentagon'. That is Because it is not possible! The laws of aerodynamics and physics tell us it is impossible for a 757 jet to have impacted the side of the Pentagon.

1st, the lift generated by a 757 traveling at nearly 500mph makes it impossible to fly that low to the ground.

2nd, the engines on the jet hang well below the fuselage, thus before the plane impacted the Pentagon the engines would have hit the ground and dug huge trenches leading to the building.

3rd, the engines are made with titanium while the fuselage is essentially tin foil. How could the fuselage make a perfectly round impact hole and the engines not make a scratch or even break a window?!

4th, no luggage, no passenger remains, no jumbo jet remains at at all.

5th, A 15-foot impact hole is the only damage to the Pentagon. How the fuck is that possible with a 757 jumbo jet?

6th, the Pentagon is the most secure and most under surveillance building in the world, how is it possible that no video exists of the jet impact? (answer: it is not possible)

7th, the path of whatever hit the Pentagon was illogical unless the plan was to hit that exact spot on the building.

8th, The moves were 'high degree' banks and turns and are not possible with a 757. Those watching radar thought it was a fighter jet (in fact it was... an A-4 Skyhawk).

The evidence, when looked at honestly and intelligently, proves it is impossible that a 757 hit the Pentagon. And physics and common sense proves that it is impossible for them to have used a remotely controlled 757, so they had to use a disguised missile or fighter jet for the maneuvers to impact.

Last Edited by Nucking Futs on 06/15/2009 04:54 PM

Only a complete moron, not educated in physics or geometry would conclude on his own that the hole was large enough to hold a 757.

No passenger planes hit any buildings that day, none!

A commercial airline would never have been able to penetrate the blast proof Kevlar reinforced concrete walls of the Pentagon, You need something along the lines of a Bunker Buster.

The aluminum would have been like putty against the concrete walls, that is why they don't make jackhammer bits out of aluminum. they needed penetration to destroy evidence just like WTC7

I`d agree so far, but I think you mismatched the A-4 with an A-3 Skywarrior. Just a few links:

Raytheon/Hughes owns a private fleet of Skywarriors:
[link to home.att.net]

Raytheon managed to perform several GPS Assisted B727 Landings on August 25 2001:
[link to www.spacedaily.com]

Here`s a slightshow showing A-3 pics. Imagine this bird painted in AA livery:
[link to www.slideshare.net]


Conclusion:
Raytheon is part of the IMC. They had the planes and the JPALS technology to do the job... not to speak of Dov Zakheim`s former company, SPC, which offers UAV guidance systems.

The OTC offers a failed student, flying a 757 for the first time, at 500 mph six feet above the lawn.

Nothing hit the Pentagon.

The damage was caused with pre-planted explosives just like at the WTC.

There was no missile and the north side plane continued passed the building after the explosion.

There is no way for a plane on the north side of the gas station to cause ANY of the damage to the light poles or the building as CIT explains in detail with pictures here:
[link to www.citizeninvestigationteam.com]

An A-3 is a fighter/bomber.

No problem, just shoot a missile or make a flyover plus an internal *boom*.

Take the tin foil off your skullcaps and rejoice. The world is round.

[link to www.popularmechanics.com]

The Pentagon Police Officer saw a large airliner flying away over the pentagon after the explosion...

but hey stop, remember: Original Gangster Obama told us a few days ago not to question 9/11.

The longer i think about it the more i come to the conclusion that it was a really bad decision to reincarnate on this wonderful planet with the lovely animals, the beautyful nature and the fucked up Homo Sapiens species.

And I suppose all those pics of jet plane landing gears and engine components taken INSIDE the Pentagon were Photoshop jobs?

Some of you really are delusional.

Well glen beck does suck dick. he's a f@ckin globalist doormat. I don't want to say republican door mat because their is NO democrat/republican. Its an illusion, they both work for the same team to achieave their agenda.