9/11 Pentagon was a sham !!! new vid from CIT puts official story to bed. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 699679 United States 06/16/2009 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 704187 United Kingdom 06/16/2009 08:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The entire width of impacted facade measured at least 140 feet, as indicated by the building plan in the Arlington After Action Report. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 700631I'm looking at the picture that you copied this from right now. Sorry but the hole is small, not even close to 140 feet. Are people really so stupid that you can just say "the hole is 140 feet", and even thought it's not even fucking close, they will still believe you? That's scary. The fusilage penetrated the building, as one would expect - leaving an appropriate sized hole, the wings impacted, but did not penetrate, leaving appropriate impact marks as annotated Is that too difficult for you to grasp? is that too advanced a concept for you? |
Ghoul User ID: 591702 United States 06/16/2009 09:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 585795 United States 06/16/2009 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So do you believe 9/11 was an inside job? Quoting: CogburnIn part or in whole, yes and the proof is not only overwhelming but has been independently verified by numerous international news sources. That which does not stand up to scrutiny is the fantasy created by P4T/CIT and their utter lack of real investigative, mathematical, or deductive ability. Perhaps their too busy figuring out new fund raising techniques to fix the email problem on their servers. Please post the links to the overwhelming proof and the numberous news sources. THanks |
Cogburn User ID: 621781 United States 06/16/2009 11:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So do you believe 9/11 was an inside job? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 645770In part or in whole, yes and the proof is not only overwhelming but has been independently verified by numerous international news sources. That which does not stand up to scrutiny is the fantasy created by P4T/CIT and their utter lack of real investigative, mathematical, or deductive ability. Perhaps their too busy figuring out new fund raising techniques to fix the email problem on their servers. You're just full of em aren't ya...just ad hominems... ... and without a single swear word to boot. It's why I want to debate CIT in person... they take far too many liberties on the internet and surrounded by fanatics. Removing such distractions would allow the information to speak for itself, which is the one thing CIT cannot afford... "While you were hanging yourself On someone else's words, Dying to believe in what you'd heard, I was staring straight into the shining sun." - David Gilmour |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 645770 United States 06/17/2009 12:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Cogburn User ID: 621781 United States 06/17/2009 12:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So do you believe 9/11 was an inside job? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 585795In part or in whole, yes and the proof is not only overwhelming but has been independently verified by numerous international news sources. That which does not stand up to scrutiny is the fantasy created by P4T/CIT and their utter lack of real investigative, mathematical, or deductive ability. Perhaps their too busy figuring out new fund raising techniques to fix the email problem on their servers. Please post the links to the overwhelming proof and the numberous news sources. THanks I'm beyond linkfights. I'll give you a point to start your own investigation and allow you to draw your own conclusions. Do your own homework. :) Start with Dick Armitage, the ISI and a $100,000 physical cash transfer in August 2001. BBC, Times of London, The Guardian, The Times of India have all done stories on the subject in the past 8 years. Follow the money, baby. "While you were hanging yourself On someone else's words, Dying to believe in what you'd heard, I was staring straight into the shining sun." - David Gilmour |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 702274 United States 06/17/2009 01:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fusilage penetrated the building, as one would expect - leaving an appropriate sized hole, the wings impacted, but did not penetrate, leaving appropriate impact marks as annotated Quoting: Anonymous Coward 704187Is that too difficult for you to grasp? is that too advanced a concept for you? Oh, you mean the 5-6ft long things 5 men carried out on their shoulders with a tarp on it? (haha) Wings impacted with marks? We think not. No windows were broke, a spool was untouched, a car was untouched. Before the wall caved, there was a tiny hole, nothing else.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 704489 Canada 06/17/2009 01:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 422489 United States 06/17/2009 01:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 422489 United States 06/17/2009 02:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
One Of My Names User ID: 482612 Australia 06/17/2009 02:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
One Of My Names User ID: 582323 Australia 06/17/2009 05:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | LOOK AT THE "TAXI"!!!! HOW MANY TAXI SERVICES DO YOU KNOW THAT USE SIGNATURES SERIES LINCOLN TOWN CARS IN THEIR FLEET?! NONE!!! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 696817Wrong. That's a bona fide taxi. (In fact, Lloyde even let the interviewer check it out.) Everytime a debunker falsely/incorrectly debunks, it merely weakens his own argument. One thing about that Taxi, if a 757 flew that close over the top of it, I mean low enough to knock over street lights. That Taxi would been blown all over the place. It would of had more than just a windshild busted. That guy driving it would of been hurt really bad or dead! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 585795 United States 06/17/2009 06:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So do you believe 9/11 was an inside job? Quoting: CogburnIn part or in whole, yes and the proof is not only overwhelming but has been independently verified by numerous international news sources. That which does not stand up to scrutiny is the fantasy created by P4T/CIT and their utter lack of real investigative, mathematical, or deductive ability. Perhaps their too busy figuring out new fund raising techniques to fix the email problem on their servers. Please post the links to the overwhelming proof and the numberous news sources. THanks I'm beyond linkfights. I'll give you a point to start your own investigation and allow you to draw your own conclusions. Do your own homework. :) Start with Dick Armitage, the ISI and a $100,000 physical cash transfer in August 2001. BBC, Times of London, The Guardian, The Times of India have all done stories on the subject in the past 8 years. Follow the money, baby. I'm aware of the money transfer and the visit to the white house on 9/10. I'm skeptical of a plane hitting the pentagon which is why I find the CIT investigation interesting. I think they would release a video showing the crash if it did. I don't care to fight about it. I don't know if this Taxi driver really exists. If CIT is willing to set up a meeting in Arlington and invite everyone to come, that is a pretty good sign of confidence in their theory and their enthusiasm to meet, debate and become real instead of just another internet entity/video. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 696544 United Kingdom 06/17/2009 06:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fusilage penetrated the building, as one would expect - leaving an appropriate sized hole, the wings impacted, but did not penetrate, leaving appropriate impact marks as annotated Quoting: Anonymous Coward 702274Is that too difficult for you to grasp? is that too advanced a concept for you? Oh, you mean the 5-6ft long things 5 men carried out on their shoulders with a tarp on it? (haha) Wings impacted with marks? We think not. No windows were broke, a spool was untouched, a car was untouched. Before the wall caved, there was a tiny hole, nothing else.. Not only that. 125ft wide wings would not be be turned 100% into confetti. There would be large chunks of metal scattered everywhere. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 704148 Switzerland 06/17/2009 06:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The entire width of impacted facade measured at least 140 feet, as indicated by the building plan in the Arlington After Action Report. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 704187I'm looking at the picture that you copied this from right now. Sorry but the hole is small, not even close to 140 feet. Are people really so stupid that you can just say "the hole is 140 feet", and even thought it's not even fucking close, they will still believe you? That's scary. The fusilage penetrated the building, as one would expect - leaving an appropriate sized hole, the wings impacted, but did not penetrate, leaving appropriate impact marks as annotated Is that too difficult for you to grasp? is that too advanced a concept for you? Where the fuck were the wings, then, asshat? [link to www.youtube.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 704576 United Kingdom 06/17/2009 06:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fusilage penetrated the building, as one would expect - leaving an appropriate sized hole, the wings impacted, but did not penetrate, leaving appropriate impact marks as annotated Quoting: Anonymous Coward 696544Is that too difficult for you to grasp? is that too advanced a concept for you? Oh, you mean the 5-6ft long things 5 men carried out on their shoulders with a tarp on it? (haha) Wings impacted with marks? We think not. No windows were broke, a spool was untouched, a car was untouched. Before the wall caved, there was a tiny hole, nothing else.. Not only that. 125ft wide wings would not be be turned 100% into confetti. There would be large chunks of metal scattered everywhere. Well I'm looking at the photo now - (will Morris no 1) [link to 911review.com] Showing...... large pieces of metal......broken windows......a car that the wings passed over....a long stretch of wall with the facade knocked off it - just the sort of thing you would expect from such a crash! I can only conclude that I am arguing with someone who is certifiably insane! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 645770 United States 06/17/2009 09:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The fusilage penetrated the building, as one would expect - leaving an appropriate sized hole, the wings impacted, but did not penetrate, leaving appropriate impact marks as annotated Quoting: Anonymous Coward 704576Is that too difficult for you to grasp? is that too advanced a concept for you? Oh, you mean the 5-6ft long things 5 men carried out on their shoulders with a tarp on it? (haha) Wings impacted with marks? We think not. No windows were broke, a spool was untouched, a car was untouched. Before the wall caved, there was a tiny hole, nothing else.. Not only that. 125ft wide wings would not be be turned 100% into confetti. There would be large chunks of metal scattered everywhere. Well I'm looking at the photo now - (will Morris no 1) [link to 911review.com] Showing...... large pieces of metal......broken windows......a car that the wings passed over....a long stretch of wall with the facade knocked off it - just the sort of thing you would expect from such a crash! I can only conclude that I am arguing with someone who is certifiably insane! You really think the left wing hit the bricks above the lower row of windows...without breaking every window..? please... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 704551 Croatia 06/17/2009 09:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 704489 Canada 06/17/2009 12:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
CitizenInvestigationTeam User ID: 677764 United States 06/17/2009 01:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So do you believe 9/11 was an inside job? Quoting: CogburnIn part or in whole, yes and the proof is not only overwhelming but has been independently verified by numerous international news sources. That which does not stand up to scrutiny is the fantasy created by P4T/CIT and their utter lack of real investigative, mathematical, or deductive ability. Perhaps their too busy figuring out new fund raising techniques to fix the email problem on their servers. You're just full of em aren't ya...just ad hominems... ... and without a single swear word to boot. It's why I want to debate CIT in person... they take far too many liberties on the internet and surrounded by fanatics. Removing such distractions would allow the information to speak for itself, which is the one thing CIT cannot afford... Cogburn, We have no desire or time to "debate" you in person or on camera. Frankly there is no debate. Your smarmy attitude doesn't help your plight either. Frankly we don't have time for these antics. Take up your little "debate" with the eyewitnesses who all place the plane on the north side of the former Citgo, take your "debate" to Rob Balsamo and Jeff Latas. You are more than welcome to contact us regarding a recorded phone call discussion/"debate" so we can help you understand whatever it is you are having trouble understanding. It's not like we haven't offered this, as you well know. Try these(as if you didn't know them): [email protected] or [email protected] You know where and how to reach us. Have a nice day. |
CitizenInvestigationTeam User ID: 677764 United States 06/17/2009 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just so it is clear to everyone, the second those witness pointed to the north side of that gas station, 9/11 was proven to be an inside job. That simple fact proves it all. You should all press the Cogburns of the world to leave us alone and accept that what the witnesses saw was not a "theory". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 699679 United States 06/17/2009 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Just so it is clear to everyone, the second those witness pointed to the north side of that gas station, 9/11 was proven to be an inside job. That simple fact proves it all. Quoting: CitizenInvestigationTeam 677764You should all press the Cogburns of the world to leave us alone and accept that what the witnesses saw was not a "theory". |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 704702 United States 06/17/2009 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 676888 United States 06/17/2009 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 667407 United States 06/17/2009 01:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | if you believe the gubberment, you won't change your mind no matter what if you are open and did your research, you KNOW it's an inside job if you believe in Jesus, you won't change your mind no matter what if you are open and did your research, you KNOW it's a scam of the highest order either way, neither side is changing their minds it's a pointless argument for both sides |
CitizenInvestigationTeam User ID: 677764 United States 06/17/2009 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Excellent! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 676888Yet another pointless 'video' by internet 'experts'! So you didn't watch it I take it? Great video. Really well put together. "I saw another plane flying away" Clearly. Thank you so much. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 645770 United States 06/17/2009 11:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 704148 Switzerland 06/18/2009 12:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ShadowDancer User ID: 287857 United States 06/18/2009 01:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | follow the money sickening ************************************ fortitudo et spes ************************************ When Japan happened I responded: "The Excrement Has Impacted the Rotary Oscillator." and clearly it has. Thread: The Excrement Is Striking the Rotary Oscillator +++++++++++++++ "Ego et Dominus sumus amici" +++++++++++++++ Ego et mea umbra +++++++++++++++ 'Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain.’ - U.S. government mind manipulator, Dr. Jose Delgado, Congressional Record, No. 262E, Vol. 118, 1974 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Realeyesrealizereallies. C. Thread: GIRD uP as GRID Collapses Thread: Eugenics 101 (Page 27) Thread: Frankenfoods for YOU (Page 2) Thread: I Do Not Consent Thread: FOOD Thread: Cern Power___Colder than Space Thread: Hempilation Compilation Contemplation Thread: Harmonics and Healing (Page 35) Thread: Sarah's Nightmare (Page 10) Thread: Destination Maccabees Thread: Let's Play a GAME Thread: Throat Singing |