|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 |
Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ...
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 681262
6/24/2009 10:11 AM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Whats that Menow?
You can't raise your eyes up a few inches? I said:
Why do you harp on an irelevent topic such as whether they ever had a box not found before? What POSSIBLE relevence could it have to ANYTHING??
Who gives a flying fuck if Nancy said that the boxes were unlikely to be found?
You give a fuck, you've been arguing about this for hours now. And you have the nerve to call others idiots.
You certainly aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer. Imagine that?
When are you going to stop attacking people for using an internet discussion forum for exactly that purpose? Probably never. Quoting: Menow 405501
Pot Kettle there, little Menow. |
|
Free Store 
User ID: 142860
6/24/2009 10:12 AM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Don't forget, NASA is under new management now
I already see the new improvements
Obama Right Again!
"do geese see god?"
"... lol, do your eyes need proof that they can see for to be able to see? "
gooderboy |
|
Circuit Breaker
Countdown To Nancy's Next Failure
User ID: 612979
6/24/2009 10:21 AM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Yes...Obama right again as he sucks this country further into debt.
Why hasn't he come forward and told anyone about "Planet X?" I thought it was only the Bush Administration that was covering it up.
Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 6/24/2009 at 10:22 AM |
|
Menow
User ID: 405501
6/24/2009 10:43 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Whats that Menow?
You can't raise your eyes up a few inches? I said:
Why do you harp on an irelevent topic such as whether they ever had a box not found before? What POSSIBLE relevence could it have to ANYTHING??
Who gives a flying fuck if Nancy said that the boxes were unlikely to be found?
You give a fuck, you've been arguing about this for hours now. And you have the nerve to call others idiots.
You certainly aren't the sharpest knife in the drawer. Imagine that?
When are you going to stop attacking people for using an internet discussion forum for exactly that purpose? Probably never.
Pot Kettle there, little Menow. Quoting: User # 78/68
I don't attack people simply FOR discussing things, bub. In fact, I encourage you to continue the discussion you started earlier. Let's see if you do:
I just want to add here that it looks like you guys might be hacking at the notion of the moon lacking spin a little too much.
Motion, ultimately, is defined along with a frame of reference. We tend to take that frame of reference for granted as implied by context.
But all motion is ultimately relative.
So Nancy can hardly be wrong if she's talking about the moon's spin if her frame of reference is to that which is synchronized to that spin, like the earth.
Of course, but the alternative is to say that the Moon is holding still and the starfield is rotating around it. Do you think that is happening?
She also says that the Moon wouldn't have ANY rotation if not for being paired with Earth because the Moon doesn't have a molten core. She's just wrong.
You haven't proven this Menow.
Proven what? Please be specific. You are adept at saying nothing and then claiming to be right. Exactly WHAT have I allegedly not proven, and exactly WHAT would you accept as proof, if anything.
The Earth is what is responsible for the "spin" of the moon. If you removed the Earth, the moon would probably spin for a while until it gradually slowed down and it's spin decayed to zero. It has no core, so no particle flow chasing each other creating a spin.
You mean we are supposed to just accept Nancy Lieder's proclamations as fact? Where is your evidence, much less any "proof" of this malarky?
I think if you stopped the moon from spinning (hypothetical, I know this is hard for you to understand)
It is not *I* who is having trouble understanding. How can you STOP something from spinning if it is NOT SPINNING in the first place. This is what Nancy claims and YOU AGREE WITH, remember?
and then let it go again in it's present orbit, it would increase it's "rate of spin"
Excuse me. Nancy's claim is that the MOON DOES NOT ROTATE, so why are you talking about increasing "rate of spin"? How can something increase it's rate of spin until it suddenly STOPS SPINNING???
until it tidally locked back on to Earth's "spin rate".
The Moon is, in fact, tidally locked to Earth, but it is NOT tidally locked to Earth's "spin rate". What you are saying is non-sense.
It's not "spinning" at the rate it is by fluke.
It's NOT SPINNING AT ALL, according to Nancy. Why do you keep contradicting her while trying to support her claim?
The Earth controls that rate of turn ... ie. it is glued to it.
I have already posted(and you ignored) that it matters NOT ONE WHIT what caused the Moon to rotate in the first place. It *IS* rotating. Nancy's claim is that THE MOON DOES NOT ROTATE.
GET IT??
YET??
The other gobbldygook is beside the point. Quoting: Menow 405501 |
|
Free Store
User ID: 142860
6/24/2009 10:43 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Yes...Obama right again as he sucks this country further into debt.
Why hasn't he come forward and told anyone about "Planet X?" I thought it was only the Bush Administration that was covering it up. Quoting: Circuit Breaker
"do geese see god?"
"... lol, do your eyes need proof that they can see for to be able to see? "
gooderboy |
|
Circuit Breaker
Countdown To Nancy's Next Failure
User ID: 612979
6/24/2009 10:49 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Yes, Bush sucked as a president. Tell us something we don't know. So far, though, Obama hasn't been much of a success. So, what's your point? Or do you have one? You certainly didn't answer my question as to why Obama hasn't come forward about "Planet X."
Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 6/24/2009 at 10:57 AM |
|
KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
6/24/2009 2:21 PM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Really, since you are a Canadian, Freestore (to my shame) as am I, what does your opinion of Bush and Obama matter and how is it relevant to the existence of a rogue planet in the inner solar system, or global warming? That's one of the things that really pisses me off about Canadians. We get offended when Americans butt in to our internal affairs, but we freely express our opinions, usually negative, about the governments elected by American citizens, as if we do any better electing our own governments. Why should an American give a shit what you think about their government. It is disrespectful of our friends to the south and it is none of our business who they elect.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
|
KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
6/24/2009 2:28 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
ROFLMAO. As you can see I am in a BAD mood this morning. LOL.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
|
Circuit Breaker
Countdown To Nancy's Next Failure
User ID: 612979
6/24/2009 2:35 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Really, since you are a Canadian, Freestore (to my shame) as am I, what does your opinion of Bush and Obama matter and how is it relevant to the existence of a rogue planet in the inner solar system, or global warming? That's one of the things that really pisses me off about Canadians. We get offended when Americans butt in to our internal affairs, but we freely express our opinions, usually negative, about the governments elected by American citizens, as if we do any better electing our own governments. Why should an American give a shit what you think about their government. It is disrespectful of our friends to the south and it is none of our business who they elect. Quoting: KeepingItReal
I'm not offended. No one has to like who we elect. It is what it is. A lot of people are speaking out about what's going on in Iran. But, ultimately, it isn't our problem. It's up to the people of Iran to take care of it.
Anyway, you have a point. What does the existence of "Planet X" have to do with U.S. politics? I know Nancy claimed the Bush Administration was covering it up...but he's no longer in office. Why hasn't Obama come forward? Why hasn't the Canadian government, or any government for that matter, announced the existence of "Planet X?" |
|
The Lone Ranger
Debunking Zetatalk for the sake of the people
User ID: 701301
6/24/2009 5:52 PM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Yes...Obama right again as he sucks this country further into debt.
Why hasn't he come forward and told anyone about "Planet X?" I thought it was only the Bush Administration that was covering it up. Quoting: Circuit Breaker
And in the near future we will be having Nancy come up with an Obama clone....or two.
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
"ZetaTalk is all crap. Nancy has spent over ten years writing and compiling a huge web site full of total bullshit. It's a work of true insanity, but useful for nothing other than students of manic disorders." Anonymous Coward. User ID: 597174. 7/11/2009 8:22 PM
--------------------------------
I concede that Nancy and ZetaTalk are not the most "trustworthy" of "sources" because her reputation, credentials and track record leave a LOT to be desired. Melfy 9/21/09 |
|
The Lone Ranger
Debunking Zetatalk for the sake of the people
User ID: 701301
6/24/2009 5:56 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Anyway, you have a point. What does the existence of "Planet X" have to do with U.S. politics? I know Nancy claimed the Bush Administration was covering it up...but he's no longer in office. Why hasn't Obama come forward? Why hasn't the Canadian government, or any government for that matter, announced the existence of "Planet X?" Quoting: Circuit Breaker
Because Planet X does not exist...certainly not as Nancy has  ed about over the years anyway.
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
"ZetaTalk is all crap. Nancy has spent over ten years writing and compiling a huge web site full of total bullshit. It's a work of true insanity, but useful for nothing other than students of manic disorders." Anonymous Coward. User ID: 597174. 7/11/2009 8:22 PM
--------------------------------
I concede that Nancy and ZetaTalk are not the most "trustworthy" of "sources" because her reputation, credentials and track record leave a LOT to be desired. Melfy 9/21/09 |
|
The Lone Ranger
Debunking Zetatalk for the sake of the people
User ID: 701301
6/24/2009 5:57 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
OMG!!
I find myself agreeing with you there Mr FrEaK Twinkie!!
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
"ZetaTalk is all crap. Nancy has spent over ten years writing and compiling a huge web site full of total bullshit. It's a work of true insanity, but useful for nothing other than students of manic disorders." Anonymous Coward. User ID: 597174. 7/11/2009 8:22 PM
--------------------------------
I concede that Nancy and ZetaTalk are not the most "trustworthy" of "sources" because her reputation, credentials and track record leave a LOT to be desired. Melfy 9/21/09 |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 141379
6/24/2009 6:00 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Ms Twinkie, Are you still going to show everybody that archive of me slandering GLP from another site or was that just a made up lie? |
|
The Lone Ranger
Debunking Zetatalk for the sake of the people
User ID: 701301
6/24/2009 6:09 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Ms Twinkie, Are you still going to show everybody that archive of me slandering GLP from another site or was that just a made up lie? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 141379
I told you to be patient my son. When you least expect it I shall deliver.
PS: Why do you despise GLP so much? Just askin.
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
"ZetaTalk is all crap. Nancy has spent over ten years writing and compiling a huge web site full of total bullshit. It's a work of true insanity, but useful for nothing other than students of manic disorders." Anonymous Coward. User ID: 597174. 7/11/2009 8:22 PM
--------------------------------
I concede that Nancy and ZetaTalk are not the most "trustworthy" of "sources" because her reputation, credentials and track record leave a LOT to be desired. Melfy 9/21/09 |
|
Free Store
User ID: 141379
6/24/2009 6:12 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Ms Twinkie, Are you still going to show everybody that archive of me slandering GLP from another site or was that just a made up lie?
I told you to be patient my son. When you least expect it I shall deliver.
PS: Why do you despise GLP so much? Just askin. Quoting: The Lone Ranger
So you are going to slander me are you?
"do geese see god?"
"... lol, do your eyes need proof that they can see for to be able to see? "
gooderboy |
|
Free Store
User ID: 141379
6/24/2009 6:19 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Trying to defame me with lies?
Where is the archive that says from another site I talked shit about GLP?
"do geese see god?"
"... lol, do your eyes need proof that they can see for to be able to see? "
gooderboy |
|
Free Store
User ID: 141379
6/24/2009 6:28 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
 for the lying shill
"do geese see god?"
"... lol, do your eyes need proof that they can see for to be able to see? "
gooderboy |
|
The Lone Ranger
Debunking Zetatalk for the sake of the people
User ID: 701301
6/24/2009 9:55 PM
| |
The Lone Ranger
Debunking Zetatalk for the sake of the people
User ID: 701301
6/24/2009 9:57 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Ms Twinkie, Are you still going to show everybody that archive of me slandering GLP from another site or was that just a made up lie?
I told you to be patient my son. When you least expect it I shall deliver.
PS: Why do you despise GLP so much? Just askin.
So you are going to slander me are you? Quoting: Free Store
You throw your stones in your glass house.....then you pay the consequences Old Man.
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
"ZetaTalk is all crap. Nancy has spent over ten years writing and compiling a huge web site full of total bullshit. It's a work of true insanity, but useful for nothing other than students of manic disorders." Anonymous Coward. User ID: 597174. 7/11/2009 8:22 PM
--------------------------------
I concede that Nancy and ZetaTalk are not the most "trustworthy" of "sources" because her reputation, credentials and track record leave a LOT to be desired. Melfy 9/21/09 |
|
Menow
User ID: 405501
6/24/2009 10:18 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Yep. User whines that we try to stiffle discussion, but when he is directly invited to continue a discussion he has already started, he is nowhere to be found.
Typical. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 711055
6/24/2009 10:30 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Ms Twinkie, Are you still going to show everybody that archive of me slandering GLP from another site or was that just a made up lie?
I told you to be patient my son. When you least expect it I shall deliver.
PS: Why do you despise GLP so much? Just askin.
So you are going to slander me are you? Quoting: Free Store
Obviously you don't know the difference between slander and libel.
As for your beloved Lieder...she's already been proven wrong with her post today about the DC Metro rail crash.
Oops! |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6330
6/25/2009 4:37 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
...she's already been proven wrong with her post today about the DC Metro rail crash. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 711055
What? AGAIN? |
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 681262
6/27/2009 12:53 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
...she's already been proven wrong with her post today about the DC Metro rail crash.
What? AGAIN? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6330
How was she proven wrong again? |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6330
6/27/2009 2:39 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
How was she proven wrong again? Quoting: User # 78/68
Well, there was the entire PX in 2003 thing. White lie or not, the prediction was wrong.
There was the time the Zetas yanked Nancy's chain, making her misidentify Mercury and Venus. Wrong again.
There's the Earth Halted in Orbit, but the right constellations can show up by tilting the Earth yet it still lines up with the North Star thing. Wrong again.
There's the worldwide clock manipulation thing, changing clocks worldwide by tens of minutes a DAY. As anyone with any analog clock can tell you, wrong again.
There's the whole Sunrise/Sunset in wrong place thing, despite GOTO telescopes being able to track the Sun. Wrong again.
There's the whole PX sets before the Sun, yet rises after the Sun. Impossibly wrong again.
There's the whole PX is to the right of the Sun no matter where you look at it from Earth, thus stating geometry is incorrect. Wrong again.
There was the Hussein still running Iraq prediction, and his coming back at an apropro time. Think that time is long past, so the prediction is wrong. (I'll be willing to retract that if Hussein suddenly shows up, but there's no evidence that will happen)
There was her prediction that the Venus Transit wouldn't occur as predicted. Wrong again.
There's that Moon does not spin idea. The Sun rises and sets on the Moon, therefore she's wrong again.
For a brand new one, there was the DC Metro crash, and her prediction that "computer system readouts will show that all components of the system were sensing correctly, and the system correctly alerted the computer system." Which it COMPLETELY did not show. Wrong again.
There are specific claims regarding individuals on this very forum that have been incorrect, such as Hap not existing. Wrong again.
There are various claims of airplane failures/crashes, and she's missed the cause nearly every time. Wrong again.
There's the kite she mistook as PX. Wrong again.
And those are just off the top of my head. There are bunches more. Do you need a longer list? |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 713250
6/27/2009 2:39 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
...she's already been proven wrong with her post today about the DC Metro rail crash.
What? AGAIN?
How was she proven wrong again? Quoting: User # 78/68
Washington, D.C. (AHN) - According to the latest National Transportation Safety Board advisory, progress is being made in the investigation of the Metro train crash that occurred Monday in Washington, D.C. Metro Operator Jeanice McMillan was one of nine people killed in the accident. The belief is that her train, while in automatic mode, did not register a train on the track ahead and therefore did not automatically stop.
According to the advisory, the NTSB has developed the following:
Investigators found metal to metal compression streak marks on both rails of the track for about 125 feet ending near the approximate point of impact, consistent with heavy braking.
Investigators conducted tests at the accident site last night with a similar train and found that when the train was stopped at the same location as the stopped struck train, the train control system lost detection of the test train.
[link to www.allheadlinenews.com] |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 527574
6/27/2009 2:42 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
How was she proven wrong again?
Well, there was the entire PX in 2003 thing. White lie or not, the prediction was wrong.
There was the time the Zetas yanked Nancy's chain, making her misidentify Mercury and Venus. Wrong again.
There's the Earth Halted in Orbit, but the right constellations can show up by tilting the Earth yet it still lines up with the North Star thing. Wrong again.
There's the worldwide clock manipulation thing, changing clocks worldwide by tens of minutes a DAY. As anyone with any analog clock can tell you, wrong again.
There's the whole Sunrise/Sunset in wrong place thing, despite GOTO telescopes being able to track the Sun. Wrong again.
There's the whole PX sets before the Sun, yet rises after the Sun. Impossibly wrong again.
There's the whole PX is to the right of the Sun no matter where you look at it from Earth, thus stating geometry is incorrect. Wrong again.
There was the Hussein still running Iraq prediction, and his coming back at an apropro time. Think that time is long past, so the prediction is wrong. (I'll be willing to retract that if Hussein suddenly shows up, but there's no evidence that will happen)
There was her prediction that the Venus Transit wouldn't occur as predicted. Wrong again.
There's that Moon does not spin idea. The Sun rises and sets on the Moon, therefore she's wrong again.
For a brand new one, there was the DC Metro crash, and her prediction that "computer system readouts will show that all components of the system were sensing correctly, and the system correctly alerted the computer system." Which it COMPLETELY did not show. Wrong again.
There are specific claims regarding individuals on this very forum that have been incorrect, such as Hap not existing. Wrong again.
There are various claims of airplane failures/crashes, and she's missed the cause nearly every time. Wrong again.
There's the kite she mistook as PX. Wrong again.
And those are just off the top of my head. There are bunches more. Do you need a longer list? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6330
Pretty weak list but it's amusing that you've invested the time and effort to come up with something like this. Seems you're pretty concerned.  |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 713250
6/27/2009 2:51 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
How was she proven wrong again?
Well, there was the entire PX in 2003 thing. White lie or not, the prediction was wrong.
There was the time the Zetas yanked Nancy's chain, making her misidentify Mercury and Venus. Wrong again.
There's the Earth Halted in Orbit, but the right constellations can show up by tilting the Earth yet it still lines up with the North Star thing. Wrong again.
There's the worldwide clock manipulation thing, changing clocks worldwide by tens of minutes a DAY. As anyone with any analog clock can tell you, wrong again.
There's the whole Sunrise/Sunset in wrong place thing, despite GOTO telescopes being able to track the Sun. Wrong again.
There's the whole PX sets before the Sun, yet rises after the Sun. Impossibly wrong again.
There's the whole PX is to the right of the Sun no matter where you look at it from Earth, thus stating geometry is incorrect. Wrong again.
There was the Hussein still running Iraq prediction, and his coming back at an apropro time. Think that time is long past, so the prediction is wrong. (I'll be willing to retract that if Hussein suddenly shows up, but there's no evidence that will happen)
There was her prediction that the Venus Transit wouldn't occur as predicted. Wrong again.
There's that Moon does not spin idea. The Sun rises and sets on the Moon, therefore she's wrong again.
For a brand new one, there was the DC Metro crash, and her prediction that "computer system readouts will show that all components of the system were sensing correctly, and the system correctly alerted the computer system." Which it COMPLETELY did not show. Wrong again.
There are specific claims regarding individuals on this very forum that have been incorrect, such as Hap not existing. Wrong again.
There are various claims of airplane failures/crashes, and she's missed the cause nearly every time. Wrong again.
There's the kite she mistook as PX. Wrong again.
And those are just off the top of my head. There are bunches more. Do you need a longer list?
Pretty weak list but it's amusing that you've invested the time and effort to come up with something like this. Seems you're pretty concerned. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 527574
More than what Nancy's followers have done. Almost every one of you, when asked, have never been able to come up with any supporting facts to back up Nancy's claims. The best all you can do is post some inane graphic with "Zetas Right Again" then run away.
So...
Zetas Wrong Again! |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6330
6/27/2009 2:55 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Pretty weak list but it's amusing that you've invested the time and effort to come up with something like this. Seems you're pretty concerned. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 527574
What might you consider a "strong" list, then? |
|
KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
6/27/2009 3:00 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
There was a time recently when a link was posted about scientists reporting on a coming catastrophe, and the poster asked Nancy if it was a credible source. She said that there are a lot of unscrupulous people out there and bogus websites, and since this source didn't have a "prediction accuracy track record" for the Zetas the source was another disinformation site. But had Nancy taken a good look at the link in question, she would have seen that it was a promotional site for the new 2012 movie.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
|
DrPostman 
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
6/27/2009 3:10 PM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Pretty weak list but it's amusing that you've invested the time and effort to come up with something like this. Seems you're pretty concerned. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 527574
Why would you equate bemusement with concern? The concern
is coming from you with your lame attempt to disparage that
list without any specifics.
You fail.
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 |
|
you are 
Mr FrEaK Twinkie 