| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 | Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ...
| Menow
User ID: 405501
7/16/2009 1:45 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Wow you really are a piece of work.
I am not even going to play along with that tantrum you just displayed.. I will simplify it for you ..
If planet x appears as the zetatalk explanation suggest then; Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
What do you mean, "IF"?? Planet X is clamed by "Zetas" to have appeared YEARS ago.
1. We have no reference(base line) to follow to come to any scientific conclusions. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
See above. Your premise fails already.
Your hypothesis on air speed lacks enough variables to make it plausible. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
Except that you can't point those alleged variables out, with an explanation of how they would affect the outcome. You have basically resorted to invoking magic as your explanation.
2. The fourth density physics are beyond human comprehension, so again any hypothesis is silly Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
See? What did I just say? Magic!
3 We also have massive amounts of geological data that says pole shifts are common to this planet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
Except that we don't. You are welcome to begin a discussion on that subject. How do I know you won't?
If you are unable to see this than I know science is not an avenue you are capable of discussing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
Uh huh. Go right ahead, and I won't be the only one entering the discussion. You're new here, right?
This will be good.
PS: It's off to bed for me now, but I look forward to your presentation.
Heh. |
| Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/16/2009 1:46 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
This is going to be amazingly funny for all of my friends, I can not wait to show them. Since you do not know me than I can understand what you are saying though. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
I have been group mailing snippets from Nancy's weekly ravings for some years now, they never fail to bring a laugh to those with common sense.
If I can offer a suggestion; when "debunking" zetatalk, you could try and see how some one could look favorable on it first. This will be a stretch I realize, but if you want to communicate an idea you need to understand the mind set of the person you are communicating with. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
We have and we still do, perhaps this will help you gain an understanding of Nancy and her followers.
{quote:Prof_Rabbit
Unfortunately the prognosis for Nancy is not good, claiming planet x as an incoming brown dwarf star in 1995 Nancy has escalated her claims over the years to culminate in the destruction of life as we know it in 2003, when this failed to materialize (and all her supporters left) Nancy's delusion simply grew and common sense of any kind disappeared, now a "water planet" inside the orbit of Venus planet x fails to vaporize due to a protective "dust cloud" while remaining invisible from all telescopes on earth.
Meanwhile Planet x and it's zetas have stopped the earth from orbiting and bob the earth up and down to fool everyone that nothing is amiss, Nancy "channels" zeta information via a "chip" in her head put there by the zetas who originally contacted Nancy by showing her an unwrapped starburst candy in a box.
Nancy wants us to prepare for planet wide destruction "real soon" during which 95% of humans will perish while true "believers" will be saved by Nancy and her zetas. I guess this is a minimalist synopsis. Nancy's proof of planet x includes pictures of a child's kite in front of the sun.
After more than 12 years without treatment Nancy demonstrates several psychotic disorders including, Delusional Disorder, Schizophrenia and Narcissistic Personality Disorder, while her family originally attempted to help, Nancy refused and has progressively deteriorated over the ensuing years.
Nancy has a complex mental condition that includes a "Messianic complex" vis.
quote
Messianic complex is a psychological state in which the individual believes him/herself to be, or is destined to become, the saviour of the particular field, a group, an event, a time period, or in an extreme scenario, the world.
People with Messianic Complexes tend to see themselves as saviours to a specific group of people or a specific field, making claims of their own glory, or claiming a self awareness of their own gift and how that gift can affect a group of people or a field of life.
In the most extreme cases, people with Messianic Complexes may see themselves as spiritual/religious Messiahs with transcendent powers who are destined to save the world.
end quote
FreeStore bought this hook line and sinker, giving up his worldly possessions to build a shelter, when May 2003 came and went FreeStore was left to either admit he made a mistake or follow Nancy, FreeStore was so entrenched with the idea of zetas that his wife and child left, so FreeStore has nothing except Nancy and the zetas, it is a sad story, one that demonstrates what happens to a cult after it collapses.
In zetatalk they make a mockery of mans science calling it a short sited cleverness. (not a direct quote) So if you want to actually engage some one who is seriously trying to comprehend what is being said, you will need to look outside of your own self interests long enough to be heard. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
Some of us have been here for many years, we have tried to bring common sense to those who stop here and look, I think we have successfully given people a chance to think while reading Nancy's delusions.
There are perhaps three or four "followers" who refuse to think, look or listen, in essence they wish for "world wide destruction", likely to fulfill their empty hateful existence.
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
| DrPostman  
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/16/2009 1:51 AM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
3 We also have massive amounts of geological data that says pole shifts are common to this planet. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
Provide some examples. I can easily point to the 45 million
year old pattern of island creation by the Hawaiian Hot Spot,
along with other hot spots that show similar slow movement of
the Earth's plates. Any rapid movement would disrupt that
pattern. Same thing goes for the magnetic zebra striping
of the Mid Atlantic Ridge that has provided us proof of
periodic magnetic polarity swaps but no crustal displacement
other than the slow and steady movement of the Earth's plates.
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725512
7/16/2009 1:54 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Wow you really are a piece of work.
I am not even going to play along with that tantrum you just displayed.. I will simplify it for you ..
If planet x appears as the zetatalk explanation suggest then;
What do you mean, "IF"?? Planet X is clamed by "Zetas" to have appeared YEARS ago.
1. We have no reference(base line) to follow to come to any scientific conclusions.
See above. Your premise fails already.
Your hypothesis on air speed lacks enough variables to make it plausible.
Except that you can't point those alleged variables out, with an explanation of how they would affect the outcome. You have basically resorted to invoking magic as your explanation.
2. The fourth density physics are beyond human comprehension, so again any hypothesis is silly
See? What did I just say? Magic!
3 We also have massive amounts of geological data that says pole shifts are common to this planet.
Except that we don't. You are welcome to begin a discussion on that subject. How do I know you won't?
If you are unable to see this than I know science is not an avenue you are capable of discussing.
Uh huh. Go right ahead, and I won't be the only one entering the discussion. You're new here, right?
This will be good.
PS: It's off to bed for me now, but I look forward to your presentation.
Heh. Quoting: Menow 405501
You really do put a lot of effort into your posts... what is your motivation? |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
7/16/2009 1:54 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
"Zetas" claim that Earth is halted in orbit NOW. That is a lie. There are literally hundreds more. This gives you no pause whatsoever?
What has given me pause is why people like you have harassed Nancy for years. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
Because she invaded an astronomy forum with her nonense and continues to spew it across the internet. People have believed it. It has ruined lives and cost people tens of thousands of dollars(people I persoally knew).
Are you really a paid shill? because I am seeing you use tactics in a conversation. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
Are you an ignorant jackass? I think so.
Twisting words around as well as the politicians.(I thought you would ask for an example so I anticipated that one)
Are you no more than an immature brat throwing a tantrum?
Do you suffer from Napoleonic syndrome?
Why do you self appoint your self to such a lost cause?
If this is all as stupid as you claim it will be self evident in time.. put your patience pants on lil guy. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
You are at once pretending to not care, and now are defending this "lost cause" with a vengence. What is YOUR investment in this hoax?
By the way. Exactly when do you say it will all be more self-evident than it is now? What will change? What methods beside mere waiting do YOU utilize to assess the validity of Zetatalk? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725512
7/16/2009 1:56 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Professor and Dr. Postman.. good to see you back .. but I will have to wait till later to respond .. |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
7/16/2009 1:57 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Wow you really are a piece of work.
I am not even going to play along with that tantrum you just displayed.. I will simplify it for you ..
If planet x appears as the zetatalk explanation suggest then;
What do you mean, "IF"?? Planet X is clamed by "Zetas" to have appeared YEARS ago.
1. We have no reference(base line) to follow to come to any scientific conclusions.
See above. Your premise fails already.
Your hypothesis on air speed lacks enough variables to make it plausible.
Except that you can't point those alleged variables out, with an explanation of how they would affect the outcome. You have basically resorted to invoking magic as your explanation.
2. The fourth density physics are beyond human comprehension, so again any hypothesis is silly
See? What did I just say? Magic!
3 We also have massive amounts of geological data that says pole shifts are common to this planet.
Except that we don't. You are welcome to begin a discussion on that subject. How do I know you won't?
If you are unable to see this than I know science is not an avenue you are capable of discussing.
Uh huh. Go right ahead, and I won't be the only one entering the discussion. You're new here, right?
This will be good.
PS: It's off to bed for me now, but I look forward to your presentation.
Heh.
You really do put a lot of effort into your posts... what is your motivation? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
What is your motivation in avoiding answering many of the points put to you?
We await your promised geological data. |
| Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/16/2009 1:58 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
I am set for a pole-shift,
No, you're not. The pole shift Nancy describes is not survivable.
That must be why she took the time to work up the safe locations pages on her site
[ link to www.zetatalk.com]
-sarcasm alert-
"Zetas" claim that Earth will stop and then turn 90 degrees in one hour. Not survivable. Period.
link please.
Also I am curious as to why this is not survivable?
I will try to explain this again:
To rotate the Earth 90 degrees in one hour requires both a change of direction (like turning right in your car) and an acceleration of the Earth to approximately 6,600 mph.
Air and water are fluid, when you are traveling in your car at a steady speed you don't feel the motion, slow down, speed up or change direction and your body moves, this is the effect of inertia, so the air above Earth and the water on the surface will suddenly move at 9 times the speed of sound.
A six thousand mph world wide hurricane followed by a six thousand mph world wide Tsunami not a single thing will be left alive, nothing.
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
| Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/16/2009 2:08 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Circumference of Earth: approx 24,000 miles.
90 degree turn equals approx 6,000 miles of surface motion.
6,000 miles in one hour equals, well, 6,000 miles per hour.
Wind generated by such rapid surface motion would scour Earth's surface clean of all Human life.
no link.
You need a link to the Earth's circumference?? Quoting: Menow 405501
Sigh, Menow, it seems some people need help to think. Are we sure this AC is not a Nancy sock or troll?
Still for the AC
The earth rotates on its axis once each day. Since the circumference of the earth at the equator is 24,901.55 miles, a spot on the equator rotates at approximately 1037.5646 miles per hour (1037.5646 times 24 equals 24,901.55) (1669.8 km/h).
At the North Pole (90 degrees north) and South Pole (90 degrees south), the speed is effectively zero since that spot rotates once in 24 hours, a very, very slow speed.
In addition to the rotational speed of the earth spinning on its axis, the earth is also speeding at about 66,660 miles per hour (107278.87 km/h) in its revolution around the sun once ever 365.2425 days.
Link
[link to geography.about.com]
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
| Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/16/2009 2:14 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
My point was not about momentum. It was about wind speed. Care to respond now that you know Nancy and "Zetas" do make the claim of 90 degree shift in one hour?
" hurricane force winds, which will be equivalent to what the Earth experiences now in hurricane force winds, so that they are not knocked about by flying objects."
[ link to zetatalk.com]
Across the entire planet at the same time!
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725512
7/16/2009 2:19 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Alright .. there will be no presentation just because menow said I would. It just isn't enough to make me click my mouse.
I also now more that three or four zetatalk follows who have invested in the "different lifestyles" None of them threw there lives away on it though. So I would say it is your friends issues long before it is Nancy's.
Note to all debunkers: Since science is something we can not agree upon and arguing about it is silly, can you debunk zetatalk on philosophical terms.. you know the follow the golden rule and Earth is a school house part? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725512
7/16/2009 2:24 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Circumference of Earth: approx 24,000 miles.
90 degree turn equals approx 6,000 miles of surface motion.
6,000 miles in one hour equals, well, 6,000 miles per hour.
Wind generated by such rapid surface motion would scour Earth's surface clean of all Human life.
no link.
You need a link to the Earth's circumference??
Sigh, Menow, it seems some people need help to think. Are we sure this AC is not a Nancy sock or troll?
Still for the AC
The earth rotates on its axis once each day. Since the circumference of the earth at the equator is 24,901.55 miles, a spot on the equator rotates at approximately 1037.5646 miles per hour (1037.5646 times 24 equals 24,901.55) (1669.8 km/h).
At the North Pole (90 degrees north) and South Pole (90 degrees south), the speed is effectively zero since that spot rotates once in 24 hours, a very, very slow speed.
In addition to the rotational speed of the earth spinning on its axis, the earth is also speeding at about 66,660 miles per hour (107278.87 km/h) in its revolution around the sun once ever 365.2425 days.
Link
[ link to geography.about.com]
WOW! the other debunker tried to be civil .. I see that you are an efficient ass.
So man has been able to dissect the parts of the globe down in to little pieces to make it comprehensibly.. congrats! |
| Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/16/2009 2:25 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Wow you really are a piece of work.
I am not even going to play along with that tantrum you just displayed.. I will simplify it for you ..
If planet x appears as the zetatalk explanation suggest then;
1. We have no reference(base line) to follow to come to any scientific conclusions. Your hypothesis on air speed lacks enough variables to make it plausible.
2. The fourth density physics are beyond human comprehension, so again any hypothesis is silly
3 We also have massive amounts of geological data that says pole shifts are common to this planet. If you are unable to see this than I know science is not an avenue you are capable of discussing. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
I call "troll!" "Nancy" or "puppet" after this post, note the following:
2. The fourth density physics are beyond human comprehension, so again any hypothesis is silly
3 We also have massive amounts of geological data that says pole shifts are common to this planet.
These statements are indicative of Nancy's brand of instant "silly science".
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725512
7/16/2009 2:25 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
My point was not about momentum. It was about wind speed. Care to respond now that you know Nancy and "Zetas" do make the claim of 90 degree shift in one hour?
" hurricane force winds, which will be equivalent to what the Earth experiences now in hurricane force winds, so that they are not knocked about by flying objects."
[ link to zetatalk.com]
Across the entire planet at the same time!
:facepalm:
Thank you for the really cool big graphic.
All I have to do is post a link to get one? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725512
7/16/2009 2:29 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
I call "troll!" "Nancy" or "puppet" after this post, Quoting: Prof_Rabbit
I call ass, ego maniac, control freak.
[link to zetatalk.com] |
| Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/16/2009 2:31 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Alright .. there will be no presentation just because menow said I would. It just isn't enough to make me click my mouse.
I also now more that three or four zetatalk follows who have invested in the "different lifestyles" None of them threw there lives away on it though. So I would say it is your friends issues long before it is Nancy's.
Note to all debunkers: Since science is something we can not agree upon and arguing about it is silly, can you debunk zetatalk on philosophical terms.. you know the follow the golden rule and Earth is a school house part? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
What, you can't get to base 1 with the science so now you try to duck out of Nancy's delusional ideas?
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
| Free Store
User ID: 148384
7/16/2009 2:35 AM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Mocking reason and science is not the same as making a mockery of science. Nancy and her crew mock anything that is provable and in the realm of common sense, but no matter how often you mock, the truth is the truth. You can mock those that paid attention in grade school science class, but that just makes you look all the more ignorant.
quote Free Store
^^^Science doesn't hold all the answers
Is that regarded as mockery or fact?
I guess science doesn't have a beautiful face as the debunkers like to think so
"do geese see god?"
"... lol, do your eyes need proof that they can see for to be able to see? "
gooderboy |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725512
7/16/2009 2:37 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
What, you can't get to base 1 with the science so now you try to duck out of Nancy's delusional ideas?
:pookie: Quoting: Prof_Rabbit
I have no respect for what you are calling science.. so I am curious if you have any other tricks in your bag. |
| DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/16/2009 2:48 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
I have no respect for what you are calling science.. so I am curious if you have any other tricks in your bag. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
So you are claiming that you have no respect for testable,
repeatable, and reproducible processes? You hold no regard
for parsimony?
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| Free Store
User ID: 148384
7/16/2009 2:53 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Yes where is the mathematical equations that say how the Earth keeps it's rotation
Hint: there is none :>
"do geese see god?"
"... lol, do your eyes need proof that they can see for to be able to see? "
gooderboy |
| Free Store
User ID: 148384
7/16/2009 2:54 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
"do geese see god?"
"... lol, do your eyes need proof that they can see for to be able to see? "
gooderboy |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725512
7/16/2009 3:03 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Yes where is the mathematical equations that say how the Earth keeps it's rotation
Hint: there is none :> Quoting: Free Store
Do you think they read the first page? |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6330
7/16/2009 3:33 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Note to all debunkers: Since science is something we can not agree upon and arguing about it is silly, can you debunk zetatalk on philosophical terms.. you know the follow the golden rule and Earth is a school house part?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
Science IS something we can agree upon. That's the point. If you construct a hypothesis and an experiment to prove or disprove it, those result should be repeatable.
Philisophical arguments about Zetatalk really ARE pointless. After all, evidence means very little in such a debate. It's all opinion.
Zetatalk's track record is BUILT on her past claims, and the whole Planet X/Poleshift idea is, by its very nature, astronomical. That's not spiritual. That's science.
If it WEREN'T about astronomy, why did Nancy invade the sci.astro newsgroup? She could have posted in alt.art-bell, or alt.alien, or alt.philosophy, or alt.teotwawki, or a HOST of other newsgroups. Heck, those others would have probably welcomed her ideas, without critically examining her ideas. But she didn't. She *chose* sci.astro, which is about the scientific discussion of astronomy. SHE chose it. Not anyone else.
When she did, she opened the door into her ideas being scrutinized scientifically. If she had merely said 'I believe,' or hadn't done the wonderful 'Zeta 100 percent accuracy' claims, or hadn't picked a specific date for PX to show up, I doubt there'd be PX debunkers. Zetatalk would have faded into the Internet Crank noise of others.
The spiritual aspect of Zetatalk didn't even APPEAR until years later, as her claims became harder and harder to support, and more and more evidence mounted that PX wasn't like she or her aliens claimed it was. Hence, white lies, elements of doubt, moving planets, and other excuses needed to be added to the Zeta mythology.
And mythology it is. I don't think there is a better way to describe the whole of the ideas of Nancy.
Zetatalk mythology rests on supposed Zeta accuracy. Without the 100 percent accuracy Zetatalk claims, its just another Internet End of the World Cult.
So, lets start with the Zeta's testable, and supposedly accurate, astronomical claims. There are observations ANYONE can make which will demonstrate the accuracy of the Zeta claims.
Experiment #1: Go see a GOTO telescope in action. Is it working? Then Zetatalk is wrong.
Experiment #2: See any astrophotographs? Do they have exposure times over six hours? Then Zetatalk is wrong.
Experiment #3: Get a sextant. Sight the North star. Does it read your latitude? Then Zetatalk is wrong.
Experiment #4: Set up a Foucault Pendulum. Does it swing as predicted? Then Zrtatalk is wrong.
Experiment #5: Get a tide chart. Does it predict the tide? Then Zetatalk is wrong.
Experiment #6: Get a GPS. Does it accurately show your latitude and longitude at a place where you KNOW what the latitude and longitude is? Then Zetatalk is wrong.
Experiment #7: Get a camera. Aim it at the North Celestial Pole and take a long exposure photograph. Do the star trails make circles around the NCP? Then Zetatalk is wrong.
If these experiments DON'T prove Zetatalk is wrong, what experiment would YOU propose? Are you thinking rationally about the Zetatalk idea? |
| Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/16/2009 4:57 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
What, you can't get to base 1 with the science so now you try to duck out of Nancy's delusional ideas?
I have no respect for what you are calling science.. so I am curious if you have any other tricks in your bag.
Sorry but you started with the science debate, so with simple logic prove any of Nancy's claims such as a "stalled earth", Px next to the sun, light speed or greater for Planet X, an "Earth twin", a stalled orbit for Venus and above all an invisible planet that only the truly retarded can see.
Last Edited by Prof_Rabbit on 7/16/2009 at 4:57 AM
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
| Halcyon Dayz, FCD
User ID: 434868
7/16/2009 5:34 AM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
We await your promised geological data. Quoting: Menow 405501
Still waiting...
can you debunk zetatalk on philosophical terms. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
Enter Sir Karl Popper.
Yes where is the mathematical equations that say how the Earth keeps it's rotation Quoting: Free Store
P = mv
F = ma
I.E. it requires a force to change the momentum of an object.
Aristotle was WRONG! Are you still living in the 16th century? Galileo already figured this one out.
I have no respect for what you are calling science. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
... she typed, her reply to the forum being enabled by quantum and solid-state physics, mathematics, communications theory, computer science, electrical engineering, etc.
An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it. - Don Marquis
To defy the authority of empirical evidence is to disqualify oneself as someone worthy of critical engagement in a dialogue. - Tenzin Gyatso
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem - William of Ockham
The truth maybe out there, but lies are inside your head - Terry Pratchett
HALCYON DAYS STOP BEING A DIPSHIT ALL YOUR LIFE YOU MORON - Anonymous Coward |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 725512
7/16/2009 5:56 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Nice job controlling the battle field and dominating to conversation, but all of you missed the point of the thread.
Have a nice life. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 726265
7/16/2009 6:16 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
 |
| Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/16/2009 6:56 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Nice job controlling the battle field and dominating to conversation, but all of you missed the point of the thread.
Have a nice life. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 725512
thank you, I do already, I hope your delusion is good for you too.
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
| Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/16/2009 6:59 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
We await your promised geological data.
Still waiting...
can you debunk zetatalk on philosophical terms.
Enter Sir Karl Popper.
Yes where is the mathematical equations that say how the Earth keeps it's rotation
P = mv
F = ma
I.E. it requires a force to change the momentum of an object.
Aristotle was WRONG! Are you still living in the 16th century? Galileo already figured this one out.
I have no respect for what you are calling science.
... she typed, her reply to the forum being enabled by quantum and solid-state physics, mathematics, communications theory, computer science, electrical engineering, etc.
Not forgetting Edison, Watt, Marconi even Benjamin Franklin! no zetas required!
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
| DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/16/2009 7:04 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
I have no respect for what you are calling science.
... she typed, her reply to the forum being enabled by quantum and solid-state physics, mathematics, communications theory, computer science, electrical engineering, etc.
Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD
Ironic, isn't it, how slow the science haters are to do away
with those very benefits they enjoy from science so much?
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 | |
|
