|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 |
Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ...
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 658394
7/17/2009 2:56 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Nancy seems to be throwing her own prediction of px being here "before 2012" under the bus as well with her latest "take it with a grain of salt" statement.
The bunkers are finally coming to the realization that it simply does not exist. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 705842
So, by Nancy's own words, ALL of Zetatalk is cast in extreme doubt.
EVERYTHING they claim may just be lies. White, or otherwise.
Good of Nancy to admit this. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 726172
7/17/2009 3:29 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
DP has his problems..very deep rooted ones Quoting: Free Store 151081
Dr. Postman has very deep rooted ones? This coming from someone who has wedded his life lock, stock and barrel to Nancy's?
Freestore, your attempt at humor has fallen flat. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 726172
7/17/2009 3:33 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Nancy seems to be throwing her own prediction of px being here "before 2012" under the bus as well with her latest "take it with a grain of salt" statement.
The bunkers are finally coming to the realization that it simply does not exist. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 705842
As others predicted a while back, Nancy would begin to hedge her bets as 2012 came closer.
If she's still around in 2012, I bet that she comes up with a real doozy to explain away the no-show pole shift. |
|
***ZetaMax*** 
Getting The Truth Out
User ID: 659599
7/17/2009 3:50 PM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Nancy seems to be throwing her own prediction of px being here "before 2012" under the bus as well with her latest "take it with a grain of salt" statement.
The bunkers are finally coming to the realization that it simply does not exist.
So, by Nancy's own words, ALL of Zetatalk is cast in extreme doubt.
EVERYTHING they claim may just be lies. White, or otherwise.
Good of Nancy to admit this. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 658394
NONSENSE
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.
ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
ZetaMax |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 704903
7/17/2009 4:06 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Nancy seems to be throwing her own prediction of px being here "before 2012" under the bus as well with her latest "take it with a grain of salt" statement.
The bunkers are finally coming to the realization that it simply does not exist.
So, by Nancy's own words, ALL of Zetatalk is cast in extreme doubt.
EVERYTHING they claim may just be lies. White, or otherwise.
Good of Nancy to admit this.
NONSENSE Quoting: ***ZetaMax***
Zetamax thinks it was a bad idea for nancy to admit this. hmmmmm.... |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 726172
7/17/2009 4:09 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Nancy seems to be throwing her own prediction of px being here "before 2012" under the bus as well with her latest "take it with a grain of salt" statement.
The bunkers are finally coming to the realization that it simply does not exist.
So, by Nancy's own words, ALL of Zetatalk is cast in extreme doubt.
EVERYTHING they claim may just be lies. White, or otherwise.
Good of Nancy to admit this.
NONSENSE Quoting: ***ZetaMax***
Nonsense?
To me it appears that Nancy is starting to hedge her bets. The first white lie was a telling thing - it was an apparent frantic attempt to cover her butt and her failed prediction for the first no-show of the pole shift. With her using the phrase "with a grain of salt" in regards to a pole shift before 2012 it would appear that her confidence in her own predictions is starting to fade.
The "pole shift" is the core of the whole zetatalk spiel. Without it, there's nothing but a bunch of new age crap, conspiracy theories, and pseudo-science. Without the "pole shift" she's like hundreds, dare say even thousands, of others posting on the internet. She just gets lost in the din and fades away like so many others.
The "pole shift" is the beginning, middle, and end of zetatalk. Take that away and there's essentially nothing to set zetatalk apart from the rest of the internet loonies. What she has remaining can be found elsewhere. |
|
Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/18/2009 1:14 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Nonsense?
To me it appears that Nancy is starting to hedge her bets. The first white lie was a telling thing - it was an apparent frantic attempt to cover her butt and her failed prediction for the first no-show of the pole shift. With her using the phrase "with a grain of salt" in regards to a pole shift before 2012 it would appear that her confidence in her own predictions is starting to fade.
The "pole shift" is the core of the whole zetatalk spiel. Without it, there's nothing but a bunch of new age crap, conspiracy theories, and pseudo-science. Without the "pole shift" she's like hundreds, dare say even thousands, of others posting on the internet. She just gets lost in the din and fades away like so many others.
The "pole shift" is the beginning, middle, and end of zetatalk. Take that away and there's essentially nothing to set zetatalk apart from the rest of the internet loonies. What she has remaining can be found elsewhere. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 726172
Remember Nancy had hundreds of followers pre 2003, almost all are gone with the exception of 3 or 4, hence Nancy is just another lonely loony.
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
|
DrPostman 
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/18/2009 6:56 AM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Remember Nancy had hundreds of followers pre 2003, almost all are gone with the exception of 3 or 4, hence Nancy is just another lonely loony. Quoting: Prof_Rabbit
Anyone who doubts how she used to have at least that many
supporters need do nothing more than check the TT-Watch
archive for May of 2003:
[link to groups.yahoo.com]
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
|
***ZetaMax***
Getting The Truth Out
User ID: 723286
7/18/2009 10:21 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Remember Nancy had hundreds of followers pre 2003, almost all are gone with the exception of 3 or 4, hence Nancy is just another lonely loony.
Anyone who doubts how she used to have at least that many
supporters need do nothing more than check the TT-Watch
archive for May of 2003:
[ link to groups.yahoo.com]
I support her NOW. How can so many people deny that everything she predicted is beginning to unfold? They will ALL be back in DROVES **SOON** as events continue to unfold.
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.
ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]
ZetaMax |
|
DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/18/2009 10:27 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Some people just never learn that "SOON" is the verbal
expression of the GLP Effect.
SOON never comes.
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
|
DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/18/2009 10:41 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
So I guess we are extending the boycott indefinitely. I will
post the following tonight to the Zetatalk Chat thread and
that will be it.
*****Debunker Boycott EXTENDED*****
This is not part of the discussion. This is a reminder that
the majority of debunkers have agreed to stop posting to
Nancy's threads for one month. The last month has been
such a success that most of us have agreed to extend it.
Some of us might post for 24 hours but beyond that we
have agreed that debunkers not participating in Zetatalk
threads have caused them to fail to get the attention they
once received.
That is all. Thanks to all who participate in this experiment.
It has so far been a resounding success. This is the only form
of communication that will be seen from most of us on Nancy's
threads for at least a while longer.
*****Debunker Boycott EXTENDED*****
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 681262
7/18/2009 10:42 AM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
STILL, none of the debunkers could explain why earthquake data ALWAYS gets downgraded. If it's an average then it stands to reason that as many should get downgraded as upgraded. The law of averages says so!
Explain it if you can? |
|
DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/18/2009 11:00 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
STILL, none of the debunkers could explain why earthquake data ALWAYS gets downgraded. If it's an average then it stands to reason that as many should get downgraded as upgraded. The law of averages says so!
Explain it if you can? Quoting: User # 78/68
I can explain that you don't know the difference between
Mb and Mw. Every time you have claimed that a quake has
been "downgraded" it turns out the difference was because
of different magnitude reporting methods. You don't mention
all the times that quakes have been upgraded either. Quakes
do get downgraded when the data shows the the initial
calculation isn't accurate, but they get upgraded just as
many times. You have no proof that anything nefarious is
happening.
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 681262
7/18/2009 11:15 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
STILL, none of the debunkers could explain why earthquake data ALWAYS gets downgraded. If it's an average then it stands to reason that as many should get downgraded as upgraded. The law of averages says so!
Explain it if you can?
I can explain that you don't know the difference between
Mb and Mw. Every time you have claimed that a quake has
been "downgraded" it turns out the difference was because
of different magnitude reporting methods. You don't mention
all the times that quakes have been upgraded either. Quakes
do get downgraded when the data shows the the initial
calculation isn't accurate, but they get upgraded just as
many times. You have no proof that anything nefarious is
happening. Quoting: DrPostman
Now, now, Dr Postman ... your nose is growing. |
|
KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
7/18/2009 11:28 AM
 | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Remember Nancy had hundreds of followers pre 2003, almost all are gone with the exception of 3 or 4, hence Nancy is just another lonely loony.
Anyone who doubts how she used to have at least that many
supporters need do nothing more than check the TT-Watch
archive for May of 2003:
[ link to groups.yahoo.com]
I support her NOW. How can so many people deny that everything she predicted is beginning to unfold? They will ALL be back in DROVES **SOON** as events continue to unfold.
Um I can deny it. No exponential increase in earthquakes, no Saint Obama saving the world and disclosing ET presence, no pole shift, no planet X, no earth halted in orbit, no sun or moon or Polaris in the wrong place, pandemic - YES, Adam Air and Air France WRONG, Steve Fossett WRONG, white lies, "grey" lies and just plain lies, lack of real understanding of metaphysics, spirituality, astronomy, maths, physics, biology, geology, meteorology, etc. All she knows is writing compilations of plagiarized material into weekly drivel fests. People like Nancy discredit the serious UFOlogists and muddy the waters for truth seekers.
She is getting more and more defensive lately, ripping a shred off newcomers with questions. Last week a guy asked her if she accepts friendly visitors, and she flamed him pretty good, showing that if human spirits were really divided into just two camps, STO and STS, she would definitely not be among the STO, since she has absolutely no compassion or kindness for anyone that doesn't just believe her and adore her.
In her videos, yet she claims to know all about everything, even the things she can't pronounce correctly, like "Mayans" which she says like the month of May. In fact, she should at least change her clothes and comb her hair before she films because in many of her videos she looks like a bag lady. She is most definitely ill, and I refuse to encourage her, for her own mental welfare. Shame on those that wind her up with adulation and enable her in her delusions. I hope you don't have occasion to feel guilty if she harms herself or others.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
|
KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
7/18/2009 11:34 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
STILL, none of the debunkers could explain why earthquake data ALWAYS gets downgraded. If it's an average then it stands to reason that as many should get downgraded as upgraded. The law of averages says so!
Explain it if you can? Quoting: User # 78/68
Not true. I remember that the first report I saw of the Sumatra quake said 8.6, which was later revised to 9*.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 681262
7/18/2009 12:09 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
STILL, none of the debunkers could explain why earthquake data ALWAYS gets downgraded. If it's an average then it stands to reason that as many should get downgraded as upgraded. The law of averages says so!
Explain it if you can?
Not true. I remember that the first report I saw of the Sumatra quake said 8.6, which was later revised to 9*. Quoting: KeepingItReal
Get your facts straight KeppingItNotSoReal ... Sumatra was a 9.3 BEFORE it was downgraded to a 9.0. Thems the facts! |
|
Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/18/2009 1:47 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
So I guess we are extending the boycott indefinitely. I will
post the following tonight to the Zetatalk Chat thread and
that will be it.
*****Debunker Boycott EXTENDED*****
This is not part of the discussion. This is a reminder that
the majority of debunkers have agreed to stop posting to
Nancy's threads for one month. The last month has been
such a success that most of us have agreed to extend it.
Some of us might post for 24 hours but beyond that we
have agreed that debunkers not participating in Zetatalk
threads have caused them to fail to get the attention they
once received.
That is all. Thanks to all who participate in this experiment.
It has so far been a resounding success. This is the only form
of communication that will be seen from most of us on Nancy's
threads for at least a while longer.
*****Debunker Boycott EXTENDED***** Quoting: DrPostman
Sounds good to me...
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
|
Prof_Rabbit
User ID: 148352
7/18/2009 1:53 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
STILL, none of the debunkers could explain why earthquake data ALWAYS gets downgraded. If it's an average then it stands to reason that as many should get downgraded as upgraded. The law of averages says so!
Explain it if you can?
Not true. I remember that the first report I saw of the Sumatra quake said 8.6, which was later revised to 9*. Quoting: KeepingItReal
The earthquake was initially reported as moment magnitude 9.0
In February 2005 scientists revised the estimate of the magnitude to 9.3.
Although the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center has accepted these new numbers, the United States Geological Survey has so far not changed its estimate of 9.1.
With a magnitude of between 9.1 and 9.3, it is the second largest earthquake ever recorded on a seismograph. (Mw)
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6330
7/18/2009 1:57 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
STILL, none of the debunkers could explain why earthquake data ALWAYS gets downgraded. If it's an average then it stands to reason that as many should get downgraded as upgraded. The law of averages says so!
Explain it if you can? Quoting: User # 78/68
User #78/68, please support your claim here with, say, data from the last 100 or so earthquakes.
And please stop misusing the law of averages, and what it 'says.' |
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 681262
7/18/2009 5:05 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
And the difference between a 9.3 and 9.0?
THREE times as large. That's some significant stuff!
Downgrading is what the USGA does. You don't get out much do you 6330? |
|
DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/18/2009 5:35 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
I can explain that you don't know the difference between
Mb and Mw. Every time you have claimed that a quake has
been "downgraded" it turns out the difference was because
of different magnitude reporting methods. You don't mention
all the times that quakes have been upgraded either. Quakes
do get downgraded when the data shows the the initial
calculation isn't accurate, but they get upgraded just as
many times. You have no proof that anything nefarious is
happening.
Now, now, Dr Postman ... your nose is growing. Quoting: User # 78/68
Tacit admission that you don't know the difference between
Mb and Mw noted.
Get your facts straight KeppingItNotSoReal ... Sumatra was a 9.3 BEFORE it was downgraded to a 9.0. Thems the facts! Quoting: User # 78/68
Explain to me how that would make a difference anyway. If
they kept it at a 9.3 it would still not be the greatest
quake ever, and if they wanted to fool the public why not
drop it to an 8.9? Most of the public don't understand
the difference between a few points. Your claim doesn't make
any sense at all.
Factor in that geologists working for the USGS make a LOT less
than they would in the oil and gas industry you have a hard
time convincing anyone that they are complicit in a conspiracy
to alter quake reports.
And the difference between a 9.3 and 9.0?
THREE times as large. That's some significant stuff!
Downgrading is what the USGA does. You don't get out much do you 6330? Quoting: User # 78/68
It's meaningless to 99% of the public. All they notice is
that it's the second largest quake ever recorded.
BTW, why haven't we seen more like that if quakes are on the
increase? Why no more giant tsunamis?
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
|
KeepingItReal
User ID: 553451
7/19/2009 12:28 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
STILL, none of the debunkers could explain why earthquake data ALWAYS gets downgraded. If it's an average then it stands to reason that as many should get downgraded as upgraded. The law of averages says so!
Explain it if you can?
Not true. I remember that the first report I saw of the Sumatra quake said 8.6, which was later revised to 9*.
Get your facts straight KeppingItNotSoReal ... Sumatra was a 9.3 BEFORE it was downgraded to a 9.0. Thems the facts! Quoting: User # 78/68
You are wrong. It was reported initially as an 8.6. I would need to go through old emails to find the proof, but it's true.
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
|
DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/19/2009 1:52 AM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
You are wrong. It was reported initially as an 8.6. I would need to go through old emails to find the proof, but it's true. Quoting: KeepingItReal
I found articles stating that it was an 8.6 and an 8.9, so
it was UPGRADED!
[link to nl.newsbank.com]
[link to news.google.com]
User knows damned well that there isn't any nefarious downgrading
going on, just refinement calculations that include ups and
downs in the reports.
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 727715
7/19/2009 2:14 AM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
You are wrong. It was reported initially as an 8.6. I would need to go through old emails to find the proof, but it's true.
I found articles stating that it was an 8.6 and an 8.9, so
it was UPGRADED!
[ link to nl.newsbank.com]
[ link to news.google.com]
User knows damned well that there isn't any nefarious downgrading
going on, just refinement calculations that include ups and
downs in the reports.
Good JOB!
You found one earth quake from 2004 .. you should pat your self on the back. |
|
DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/19/2009 2:46 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
Good JOB!
You found one earth quake from 2004 .. you should pat your self on the back. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 727715
Wrong. I found THE quake that User was referencing and
claiming was downgraded. What's wrong with your comprehension
skills?
Nice try at deflecting from User's error though.
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
|
User # 78/68
User ID: 681262
7/20/2009 1:04 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
You are wrong. It was reported initially as an 8.6. I would need to go through old emails to find the proof, but it's true.
I found articles stating that it was an 8.6 and an 8.9, so
it was UPGRADED!
[ link to nl.newsbank.com]
[ link to news.google.com]
User knows damned well that there isn't any nefarious downgrading
going on, just refinement calculations that include ups and
downs in the reports.
Good JOB!
You found one earth quake from 2004 .. you should pat your self on the back.
EXACTLY!
Now, let us ALL watch them squirm as the earthquakes come in downgraded time and time again. I will keep reminding you and showing the complicite nature of the USGS. This is going to be easy. Downgrade away ... some people are watching! |
|
DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
7/20/2009 3:15 PM
| | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
You are wrong. It was reported initially as an 8.6. I would need to go through old emails to find the proof, but it's true.
I found articles stating that it was an 8.6 and an 8.9, so
it was UPGRADED!
[link to nl.newsbank.com]
[link to news.google.com]
User knows damned well that there isn't any nefarious downgrading
going on, just refinement calculations that include ups and
downs in the reports.
Good JOB!
You found one earth quake from 2004 .. you should pat your self on the back.
EXACTLY!
Now, let us ALL watch them squirm as the earthquakes come in downgraded time and time again. I will keep reminding you and showing the complicite nature of the USGS. This is going to be easy. Downgrade away ... some people are watching! Quoting: User # 78/68
It's the quake YOU referenced! I busted your claim
about it being downgraded. It was at first UPGRADED! You
have again failed to show that there is anything wrong going
on. What's funny is that I used YOUR example.
How about you prove the USGS is downgrading quakes, and then
explain how it would matter to a public who doesn't understand
magnitudes in the first place. How is a few points really
going to matter to anyone but scientists?
I know you want people to squirm and that's how you get your
jollies but you'll need to look elsewhere. You've failed
here, bigtime.
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 727715
7/20/2009 3:43 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
How about you prove the USGS is downgrading quakes, and then
explain how it would matter to a public who doesn't understand
magnitudes in the first place. How is a few points really
going to matter to anyone but scientists? Quoting: DrPostman
[link to www.iris.edu]
15-JUL-2009 09:22:32 -45.72 166.64 7.8 35.0 OFF W. COAST OF S. ISLAND, N.Z.
[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]
Magnitude 7.6
Date-Time
* Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 09:22:29 UTC
* Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 08:22:29 PM at epicenter
.. never constant .
But if you are actually looking at this data in real time and have yet to realize the deceitfulness of these organizations, then you have bigger issues to contend with. |
|
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 708117
7/20/2009 4:12 PM | | Re: Zetatalk debunker threads are hilarious ... | Quote |
The zeitgeist movement is about control-
This is not star trek-as a matter of fact the life on earth was never explores properly-
we just took our hatred and problems with each other and directed or projected it onto metaphorical aliens in star trek-
Zeitgeist is inherently a disposing of individual difference, uniqueness and small community in favor of oligarchy...it didn't work in old communism and it won't work in new communism-
power and control exist and on a global scale-be very afraid.. |
|
| Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 |
|
