Godlike Productions Banner
Users Online Now: 1,181 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 151,426
Pageviews Today: 384,464Threads Today: 426Posts Today: 7,500
02:25 PM
NEW GLP LIVE VOICE & TEXT CHAT




Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Join Now, Free! (& No Ads!) Forgot Your Password?
E-mailPasswordRemember
Rate this Thread
Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 
Page 12

*** MOON NUKE ***

 RSS 
The Aliens are pissed!
User ID: 706279
6/21/2009 7:41 AM
Report abusive post
*** MOON NUKE ***
Quote

[link to www.examiner.com]

NASA moon bombing violates space law & may cause conflict with lunar ET/UFO civilizations

The planned October 9, 2009 bombing of the moon by a NASA orbiter that will bomb the moon with a 2-ton kinetic weapon to create a 5 mile wide deep crater as an alleged water-seeking and lunar colonization experiment, is contrary to space law prohibiting environmental modification of celestial bodies. The NASA moon bombing, a component of the LCROSS mission, may also trigger conflict with known extraterrestrial civilizations on the moon as reported on the moon in witnessed statements by U.S. astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong, and in witnessed statements to NSA (National Security Agency) photos and documents regarding an extraterrestrial base on the dark side of the moon.

If the true intent of the LCROSS mission moon bombing is a hostile act by NASA against known extraterrestrial civilizations and settlements on the moon, then NASA and by extension the U.S. government are guilty of aggressive war which is the most serious of war crimes under the U.N. Charter and the Geneva Conventions, to which the U.S. is subject. The U.N. Outer Space Treaty, which the U.S. has ratified, requires that “ The moon and other celestial bodies shall be used by all States Parties to the Treaty exclusively for peaceful purposes. The establishment of military bases, installations and fortifications, the testing of any type of weapons and the conduct of military manoeuvres on celestial bodies shall be forbidden.” 98 nations have ratified and 125 nations have signed the U.N. Outer Space Treaty.

NASA’s LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) mission

The NASA LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) mission, which departed on Earth on June 18, 2009. According to one report, “Flying over the moon's southern hemisphere, LCROSS will use its high-precision instruments, as well as close-up images of the terrain gathered by the lunar orbiter, to seek out a crater just shallow enough and dark enough to be a prime bombing target.

“There, acting as what the Ames team calls its "shepherding spacecraft," LCROSS will guide an empty Centaur rocket weighing two tons toward its target. The rocket will crash into the crater at 5,600 mph, creating a new crater - perhaps as large as 5 miles wide. The crash is scheduled to occur Oct. 9.”

The two-ton Centaur rocket qualifies as a space-based kinetic weapon. The reason alleged by NASA for the mission is that “the [LCROSS} probes will map possible landing sites and search for water sources that could be used by a future lunar colony.”

According to NASA, “The Mission Objectives of the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) include confirming the presence or absence of water ice in a permanently shadowed crater at the Moon’s South Pole. The identification of water is very important to the future of human activities on the Moon. LCROSS will excavate the permanently dark floor of one of the Moon’s polar craters with two heavy impactors in 2009 to test the theory that ancient ice lies buried there. The impact will eject material from the crater’s surface to create a plume that specialized instruments will be able to analyze for the presence of water (ice and vapor), hydrocarbons and hydrated materials.”

NASA: LCROSS launch of luner orbiter, June 18, 2009


U.S. astronauts, NASA employees, Soviet scientists, NSA confirm the extraterrestrial presence on the moon

There are confirmed reports of an extraterrestrial presence on the moon, both from U.S. astronauts who have visited the moon, from NASA employees, from Soviet scientists and observers of the NASA moon visits, and from witnessed NSA (National Security Agency) reports on a moon based on the far side of the moon.

One report states that, “In a 2006 television documentary, ‘Apollo 11: The Untold Story,’ Buzz Aldrin admitted for the first time publicly that the astronauts saw UFOs on their trip to the Moon, but they were not allowed to discuss this information on the live audio feed to NASA. He stated that he felt it would have caused a ‘panic.’”

Other research on witnessed corroboration of U.S. astronaut sightings of an extraterrestrial presence on the Moon states, “According to hitherto unconfirmed reports, both Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin saw UFOs shortly after their historic landing on the Moon in Apollo 11 on 21 July 1969. I remember hearing one of the astronauts refer to a "light" in or on a carter during the television transmission, followed by a request from mission control for further information. Nothing more was heard.”

“According to a former NASA employee Otto Binder, unnamed radio hams with their own VHF receiving facilities that bypassed NASA's broadcasting outlets picked up the following exchange:

“NASA: What's there? Mission Control calling Apollo 11...

“Apollo: These ‘Babies’ are huge, Sir! Enormous! OH MY GOD! You wouldn't believe it! I'm telling you there are other spacecraft out there, lined up on the far side of the crater edge! They're on the Moon watching us!

“In 1979, Maurice Chatelain, former chief of NASA Communications Systems confirmed that Armstrong had indeed reported seeing two UFOs on the rim of a crater. ‘The encounter was common knowledge in NASA,’ he revealed, ‘but nobody has talked about it until now.’

“Soviet scientists were allegedly the first to confirm the incident. ‘According to our information, the encounter was reported immediately after the landing of the module,’ said Dr. Vladimir Azhazha, a physicist and Professor of Mathematics at Moscow University. ‘Neil Armstrong relayed the message to Mission Control that two large, mysterious objects were watching them after having landed near the moon module. But his message was never heard by the public-because NASA censored it.’

“According to another Soviet scientist, Dr. Aleksandr Kazantsev, Buzz Aldrin took color movie film of the UFOs from inside the module, and continued filming them after he and Armstrong went outside. Dr. Azhazha claims that the UFOs departed minutes after the astronauts came out on to the lunar surface.

“Maurice Chatelain also confirmed that Apollo 11's radio transmissions were interrupted on several occasions in order to hide the news from the public. Before dismissing Chatelain's sensational claims, it is worth noting his impressive background in the aerospace industry and space program. His first job after moving from France was as an electronics engineer with Convair, specializing in telecommunications, telemetry, and radar. In 1959 he was in charge of an electromagnetic research group, developing new radar and telecommunications systems for Ryan. One of his eleven patents was an automatic flights to the Moon. Later, at North American Aviation, Chatelain was offered the job of designing and building the Apollo communications and data-processing systems.

“Chatelain claims that ‘all Apollo and Gemini flights were followed, both at a distance and sometimes also quite closely, by space vehicles of extraterrestrial origin-flying saucers, or UFOs, if you want to call them by that name. Every time it occurred, the astronauts informed Mission Control, who then ordered absolute silence.’ He goes on to say:

“I think that Walter Schirra aboard Mercury 8 was the first of the astronauts to use the code name 'Santa Claus' to indicate the presence of flying saucers next to space capsules. However, his announcements were barely noticed by the general public.

“It was a little different when James Lovell on board the Apollo 8 command module came out from behind the moon and said for everybody to hear:

'PLEASE BE INFORMED THAT THERE IS A SANTA CLAUS.'

“Even though this happened on Christmas Day 1968, many people sensed a hidden meaning in those words."



NASA's Maurice Chatelain, moon whistleblower


NSA photos, documents of an extraterrestrial base on the dark side of the moon

Former USAF U.S. Sgt. Karl Wolfe, a Disclosure Project witness, describes photos, documents of extraterrestrial bases on the dark side of the moon that he witnessed at the NSA (National Security Agency), in the 1960s. One report states that “Sgt Wolfe was working with Tactical Air Command at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia in 1965. There, he was assigned to the lunar orbital project with the National Security Agency where he met an airman who confided in him that they had discovered bases in the far side of the moon.”

Sgt Wolfe’s Disclosure Project testimony, in which he states that he is willing to testify under oath before the U.S. Congress, can be seen in the video below.


One account states, “The airman told him (Wolfe) that all of the NASA photographs were sent to Langley, where they were enhanced, and eventually made into photographs to be sent to and studied by the different branches of the military. He was also told why security was of the utmost importance at the lab on this particular day-recent enhanced imagery had clearly shown structures on the far side of the Moon. These structures were definitely not created by natural forces-they were made by intelligent beings.

“’We discovered,’ the airman said, ‘a base on the back side of the Moon.’

Wolfe was in no way prepared for what he had just been told. When he airman saw Wolfe nearly shaking in disbelief, he reiterated:

“’Yes, a base on the dark side of the Moon.’

“Although Wolfe had not actually been told that some alien intelligence had made the aforementioned structures, who else could it have been? Although Russia had flown unmanned vessels around to the far side, no landing had been made, and the resources and technology needed to build a station there were far beyond that of Russia at the time. Had they made a landing on the Moon, the entire world would have known about it. And Wolfe knew America was still years from a Moon landing.

“His anxiety reached a new level. He was looking at, and being told about, something that he should not have seen or known about. He was actually afraid of being arrested and a court martial. He only wanted to finish his job, and get out of there, and forget the whole incident. He would finish the repair he was called to do, but he could never forget what he had seen that day at Langley. He would tell not a soul for 30 years.

“His release from the military also required that he not leave the United States for five years. This was a condition of his security status. He also was sworn to not reveal anything he had seen while performing his duties in the military. Wolfe would eventually put a report on what he had seen on video, which is now available on the Internet. There have also been several ex-NASA employees who have come forward telling of their experiences in air brushing structures out of NASA photographs of the Moon.”



NASA’s lunar bombing violates space law and must be stopped

NASA’s use of a 2-ton empty Centaur rocket as a kinetic weapon violates space law in multiple ways and must be stopped, in flight or in lunar orbit, which the LCROSS lunar orbiter reaches on Tuesday June 23, 2009.

The bombing of the moon with a kinetic weapon to create a 5 mile crater is a per se violation of the U.N. Outer Space Treaty, which the U.S. has ratified, irrespective of its being designed as part of an experiment related to lunar colonization.

The U.N. Outer Space Treaty (Article III) provides that “States Parties to the Treaty shall carry on activities in the exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, in accordance with international law, including the Charter of the United Nations.”

The Moon Treaty (Agreement Governing The Activities Of States On The Moon And Other Celestial Bodies (1979)) addresses and bans the specific activity bombing of the moon carried out unilaterally by the U.S. The Moon Treaty prohibits disruption of the environment of the Moon. The LCROSS bombing constitutes a disruption of the delicate balance of the lunar ecology. Article 7 of the Moon Treaty states:

Article 7 of the Moon Treaty

“1. In exploring and using the moon, States Parties shall take measures to
prevent the disruption of the existing balance of its environment whether
by introducing adverse changes in that environment, by its harmful
contamination through the introduction of extra-environmental matter or
otherwise. States Parties shall also take measures to avoid harmfully
affecting the environment of the earth through the introduction of
extraterrestrial matter or otherwise.

“2. States Parties shall inform the Secretary-General of the United
Nations of the measures being adopted by them in accordance with
paragraph 1 of this article and shall also, to the maximum extent
feasible, notify him in advance of all placements by them of radio-active
materials on the moon and of the purposes of such placements.

“3. States Parties shall report to other States Parties and to the
Secretary-General concerning areas of the moon having special scientific
interest in order that, without prejudice to the rights of other States
Parties, consideration may be given to the designation of such areas as
international scientific preserves for which special protective
arrangements are to be agreed upon in consultation with the competent
bodies of the United Nations.”

Although the U.S. has not ratified the Moon Treaty, 13 nations have, and it can be construed as a relevant international standard of what constitutes “international law” under the U.N. Outer Space Treaty.

Is NASA’s LCROSS bombing of the moon a camouflaged attack or attempt to impose moon sovereignty by the U.S.?

There is witnessed evidence, through the testimony of UASF SGT Karl Wolfe and through the statements of U.S. astronauts, NASA employees, former Soviet scientists that the U.S., and its agencies NASA and the NSA has had scientific evidence that the moon has extraterrestrial civilizations and present settlements on it for more than 40 years, since the 1960s.

The U.S. has not attempted any public, peaceful diplomacy with the civilizations on the moon. In fact, the U.S. has imposed an embargo on public knowledge that settlements and an extraterrestrial presence exist on the moon.

What is touted as a scientific experiment – the bombing of the moon – may in reality be an attempt to impose de facto U.S. sovereignty on the moon. Article II of the U.N. Outer Space Treaty, which the U.S. has signed, states: “Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any other means.”

Moreover, the LCROSS bombing of the moon may be an intentional hostile act by the U.S. (which has know the moon is inhabited for at least 40 years by other civilizations), a kind of “shot across the bow” to mark turf against other intelligent civilizations on the moon.

The U.N. Outer Space Treaty prohibits non-peaceful activities on the moon. Article IV states, “The moon and other celestial bodies shall be used by all States Parties to the Treaty exclusively for peaceful purposes. The establishment of military bases, installations and fortifications, the testing of any type of weapons and the conduct of military manoeuvres on celestial bodies shall be forbidden.”

NASA’s LCROSS bombing of the moon must be stopped, while the lunar orbiter is in orbit, before the bombing occurs on October 9, 2009.

Twitter Pete Worden, director of NASA’s Ames Centre, to stop LCROSS bombing

If you are interested in stopping NASA’s LCROSS bombing, please write Pete Worden,
Director of the NASA Ames Centre, which oversees LCROSS. You can twitter Worden at [link to twitter.com]

-----------------------

crazy shit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 707943
6/21/2009 7:42 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

you said buzz
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 706776
6/21/2009 7:45 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Surely using nukes to find water on the moon would render any water that might be found unusable?

NASA / USAF etc, can't be that stupid; or is it merely the meeja and the sheeple who don't really understand what's going on?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 707189
6/21/2009 7:48 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Wow...
Ok, what they are actually going to do is accelerate one of the two probes on this mission into the lunar surface to create a dust cloud which they will then analyse for sings of water.

LRO will go into orbit around the moon, turning its suite of instruments towards the moon for thorough studies. The spacecraft also will be looking for potential landing sites for astronauts.

LCROSS, on the other hand, will guide an empty upper stage on a collision course with a permanently shaded crater in an effort to kick up evidence of water at the moon's poles. LCROSS itself will also impact the lunar surface during its course of study.

[link to www.nasa.gov]

No nuke, no bomb.
No explosives at all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 708013
6/21/2009 7:58 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 706279 (OP)
6/21/2009 7:59 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Surely using nukes to find water on the moon would render any water that might be found unusable?

NASA / USAF etc, can't be that stupid; or is it merely the meeja and the sheeple who don't really understand what's going on?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 706776


It's a kinetic weapon, not a nuke.

( I was just spicing up the title )


abduct
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 707993
6/21/2009 8:01 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

"is contrary to space law prohibiting environmental modification of celestial bodies."

What a stupid fucking law!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 708013
6/21/2009 8:09 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

What about the lucifer project? We just gonna send a 1000 kiloton bomb into Saturn. Pretty good fucking idea if you ask me.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 659714
6/21/2009 8:20 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

The U.S. has not attempted any public, peaceful diplomacy with the civilizations on the moon. In fact, the U.S. has imposed an embargo on public knowledge that settlements and an extraterrestrial presence exist on the moon.

That's BAD..! really.. bad.. that no-one has even attempted to extend the hand of friendship to the aliens. Very bad..!


Moreover, the LCROSS bombing of the moon may be an intentional hostile act by the U.S. (which has know the moon is inhabited for at least 40 years by other civilizations), a kind of “shot across the bow” to mark turf against other intelligent civilizations on the moon.

Then.. the only.. way to stop it is for public disclosure this summer, either humans reveal their presence.. or aliens make their presence known about to the public.. or both.

Aliens will of course stop the explosion, but that's not the point.. the hositle 'intent' is there. The 'hostility began when Americans planted 'their' flag on the moon, the Stars & Stripes.. inseated of placing a 'neutral' flag to represent 'all' of mankind. Werner von Braun was right then...

It's a pity the 'intel' agencies are not clever & wise..
Perseus
User ID: 707863
6/21/2009 8:20 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Maybe that's what they wanna do, provoke an interstellar war.


Since they might not succeed in provoking a WAR on Earth to imprison humanity, as more and more people might wake up and go against these Illuminati scums.


The only way is to really create a common enemy to humanity.


Terrorism doesn't work.

North Korean and Iran also might not work.


Provoking an alien invasion/hostility ought to do it, unite humanity to give up their rights to the NWO to fight the ETs.

We have no idea if the provoked Alien Invasion would be real or not, but one thing is for sure.


They're bent on provoking some sort of confrontation with foreign civilizations, since they might not succeed in provoking the local ones.


It's a way to force a dictatorial world government on to the population to justify fight against an extraterrestial force, real or imagined.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 706279 (OP)
6/21/2009 8:22 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Maybe that's what they wanna do, provoke an interstellar war.
 Quoting: Perseus

alien11alienshipalien11alienship

ana ana
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 659714
6/21/2009 9:05 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Maybe that's what they wanna do, provoke an interstellar war.


alien11alienshipalien11alienship

ana ana
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 706279


.. just hope the aliens don't blame humanity in 'general.' Seeing as this NWO scum apparently had their own citizens abducted & anal probed, maybe the aliens should pick up the bastards planning this evil.. tie them up & get the most viscious & sadistic 'man' hating Dominatrix in latex to fuck them up the ass with a 12" nighmare dildo. Yeah, fuck em!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 706279 (OP)
6/21/2009 9:09 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Anonymous Coward
User ID: 124430
6/22/2009 10:16 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

putin
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 225190
6/22/2009 10:18 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

This should be pinned because it is true

Read Penetration by Ingo Swann
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 682487
6/22/2009 10:26 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Surely using nukes to find water on the moon would render any water that might be found unusable?

NASA / USAF etc, can't be that stupid; or is it merely the meeja and the sheeple who don't really understand what's going on?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 706776
nasas cover stories have become so lame. nasa is playing with fire, they are going to get so burned.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 702146
6/22/2009 10:28 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

NO WAY they are bombing the moon to look for ice...


lets hope some of the ets intervene, and turn that fucking probe into space dust.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 706279 (OP)
6/22/2009 10:28 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

PIN ME!

banana2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 629459
6/22/2009 10:38 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

lmfao......

guys...

ummm...."KINETIC" weapon.

you guys know what kinetic energy is correct?
you also know how hard ineffective anything explosive would be in the vacuum of space right?

can someone post one of those emperial "BAN HIM" pics with the big thumbs down? i thought we were going to mount some sweet new weaponry on the moon as an intergalactic check point before getting on to earth...maybe something to break up asteroids and meteors before they hit earth...then i open the thread and see whats REALLY going on! tsk tsk

why wouldn't they just send people up there to look for water? go for like a month or 2, dig around, get instant results, and perhaps colonize right then and there if it was possible. we've been squandering our space programs for decades now...lets get some real result plz?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 702146
6/22/2009 10:41 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

lmfao......

guys...

ummm...."KINETIC" weapon.

you guys know what kinetic energy is correct?
you also know how hard ineffective anything explosive would be in the vacuum of space right?

can someone post one of those emperial "BAN HIM" pics with the big thumbs down? i thought we were going to mount some sweet new weaponry on the moon as an intergalactic check point before getting on to earth...maybe something to break up asteroids and meteors before they hit earth...then i open the thread and see whats REALLY going on! tsk tsk

why wouldn't they just send people up there to look for water? go for like a month or 2, dig around, get instant results, and perhaps colonize right then and there if it was possible. we've been squandering our space programs for decades now...lets get some real result plz?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 629459




You trust TPTB to weaponize space?

Fucking ludicrous.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 706279 (OP)
6/22/2009 10:44 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

lmfao......

guys...

ummm...."KINETIC" weapon.

you guys know what kinetic energy is correct?
you also know how hard ineffective anything explosive would be in the vacuum of space right?

can someone post one of those emperial "BAN HIM" pics with the big thumbs down? i thought we were going to mount some sweet new weaponry on the moon as an intergalactic check point before getting on to earth...maybe something to break up asteroids and meteors before they hit earth...then i open the thread and see whats REALLY going on! tsk tsk

why wouldn't they just send people up there to look for water? go for like a month or 2, dig around, get instant results, and perhaps colonize right then and there if it was possible. we've been squandering our space programs for decades now...lets get some real result plz?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 629459


You need to refer to the video posted above.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 124430
6/22/2009 10:46 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

For the uninformed - NASA has ALREADY CRASHED THE UPPER STAGE OF A ROCKET INTO THE MOON. NO DOOM.

The S-IVB stage of the Saturn V was INTENTIONALLY crashed into the moon so that the moonquake sensors could be calibrated and exercised, among other things. That stages STILL had fuel onboard (hydrogen and oxygen). This happened a couple of times. NASA is crashing a Centaur upper stage which is a bit smaller than the S-IVB. I think it will be moving slower as well.

So again,

putin


/
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 124430
6/22/2009 10:49 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

For the uninformed - NASA has ALREADY CRASHED THE UPPER STAGE OF A ROCKET INTO THE MOON. NO DOOM.

The S-IVB stage of the Saturn V was INTENTIONALLY crashed into the moon so that the moonquake sensors could be calibrated and exercised, among other things. That stages STILL had fuel onboard (hydrogen and oxygen). This happened a couple of times. NASA is crashing a Centaur upper stage which is a bit smaller than the S-IVB. I think it will be moving slower as well.

So again,

putin


/
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 124430



HERE:

[link to nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 629459
6/22/2009 10:51 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

lmfao......

guys...

ummm...."KINETIC" weapon.

you guys know what kinetic energy is correct?
you also know how hard ineffective anything explosive would be in the vacuum of space right?

can someone post one of those emperial "BAN HIM" pics with the big thumbs down? i thought we were going to mount some sweet new weaponry on the moon as an intergalactic check point before getting on to earth...maybe something to break up asteroids and meteors before they hit earth...then i open the thread and see whats REALLY going on! tsk tsk

why wouldn't they just send people up there to look for water? go for like a month or 2, dig around, get instant results, and perhaps colonize right then and there if it was possible. we've been squandering our space programs for decades now...lets get some real result plz?


You need to refer to the video posted above.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 706279


which one? the old atari one? or the comedy sketch one? "we will wait for the full moon to make sure we get the whole thing!"(that's paraphrasing there sir, not a direct quote) lol!

i would rather believe the results of the last few millenia of the study of physical matter and the reason for physical reactions.

i don't know what you want me to look for in those videos, i find a little satirical humor in the first, a little reminsecent nastolgia in the second...but nothing that makes me change my mind. you must truly realize there are much better ways to search for water on the moon than dropping a nuke on it. a kinetic weapon would be what you watched that US navy ship launch at that satelite a year or so back...the one that was in response to the chinese? or am i suppose to ignore facts on this website? is that how the game is played?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 708855
6/22/2009 10:52 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

so countries on earth aren't enough for these fuckers. now the moon must be democratized
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 629459
6/22/2009 10:52 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

For the uninformed - NASA has ALREADY CRASHED THE UPPER STAGE OF A ROCKET INTO THE MOON. NO DOOM.

The S-IVB stage of the Saturn V was INTENTIONALLY crashed into the moon so that the moonquake sensors could be calibrated and exercised, among other things. That stages STILL had fuel onboard (hydrogen and oxygen). This happened a couple of times. NASA is crashing a Centaur upper stage which is a bit smaller than the S-IVB. I think it will be moving slower as well.

So again,

putin


/
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 124430


didnt the Japs just do it too? they might've done it to a different planet as well. this thread promised some real interstellar doom...i came in thinking there was plenty to go around! op, you owe me 15 minutes
xc
User ID: 707975
6/22/2009 10:53 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Surely using nukes to find water on the moon would render any water that might be found unusable?

NASA / USAF etc, can't be that stupid; or is it merely the meeja and the sheeple who don't really understand what's going on?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 706776

yea i don't buy the water finding excuse either.

I think there is a big asteroid heading to the moon and they wan't to create a small impact to see it's effect on the moon.

This way they can more or less calculate how much damage the astroid will inlict on the moon on impact!

This is the only logical explanation for such madness.
HARDPLANET
User ID: 707765
6/22/2009 10:53 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

Idol1

[link to www.dailymotion.com]

burnit
Love The World, Save The Planet

[link to hardplanet.ning.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 225190
6/22/2009 10:58 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

You people need to learn the basis lesson of

quit bombing the shit out of everything

tick tock
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 629459
6/22/2009 10:58 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

aye, i don't really think any body in our solar system is in danger until we start talking about anti matter reactions. you guys realize how much energy is released by the earth every day right? even something as small as the moon is a lot tougher than it appears some of you believe. plus, would a nuke be as effective in space anyway? i think there has a lot to do with pressures that might not be so easily obtained when you have no outside pressures to help out. i could be wrong though.
CONTAMINATION
User ID: 708937
6/22/2009 11:00 AM
Re: *** MOON NUKE ***Quote

<<<<<<

When shit hits the fan we'll all go hang on the moon where we already contaminated it with Nuclear weapons...
Page 12
Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Click Here To Donate To GLP!



 Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional



Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 10,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.

The content of post on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Privacy Policy - Terms Of Use


Copyright 1999-2010 © GodLikeProductions.com

Page generated in 0.103s (5 queries)