Posting the truth on ATS gets you banned for life.

Where is your original post? Do you have it for us to read? Was it inflammatory or neutral?

:psyop1:

It would be awesome if you reposted it here.

Lol, banned for life .... Post it here if you can..

Last Edited by Mister Dubious on 06/22/2009 07:46 AM

CIA front: Probably
Been banned from there for describing something I saw
No one will turn up at your door
Be happy you're free of their censorship and control of the information.

Ill see if I can find it, if its not deleted and all. I made a couple posts before it but I checked and those were not deleted. However in one of the threads, Skeptic Overlord threatens to ban someone based on their opinion alone. Maybe Skeptic just went off and banned a buncha people for no reason. It sure is curious how I brought out the stuff on Iran and my accounts perma banned all of a sudden though.

Last Edited by Memysabu on 06/22/2009 07:51 AM

What is ATS?

Heres one post, Im not finding any posts deleted which is odd. I took social psychology in college and made an A. So I know something about it and I know the government hires them to do mass programming. Dont believe me? Watch "why we fight".

Anyhow heres the post. In response to child porn being found a week later on the computer of the guy who shot a musem up. This was then used to discredit 911 truthers by glenn beck.


"One thing the powers that be do is discredit via sexual perversion. They wont come after you for anything that could lead back to them. I would not put it past them to plant child porn on him. Id think if someone was gonna go out john wayne style theyd have their personal affairs in order before doing so.

Not that he couldnt have been a pedo, I just find it odd that they wanted to see what porn he prefered when his house and computer had no part in the crime. Since they thought this guy was a 911 truther why wasnt this brought out from day one? Sounds fishy to me.

The prefered social psychological action targets females. One thing that repulses them is child porn. Psychology teaches us if you get the female the male follows and so do the children, obviously. Women dont pay attention to logic, they find it boring. So bringing up a large logical argument they would surely lose the attention of the female population.

Its like Ive told people, there are several things you can say about someone to discredit them. Call someone a rapist, a child molester, or a wife beater. Thats all you have to do, the general public will believe you and lynch them, no evidence required. Any evidence submitted to the contrary will be considered a conspiracy."

I went into another post on Iran and how they are programming women in america saying women are being beaten there because they ARE RIGHT NOW IN THE STREETS protesting for womens rights. They tryed to turn this election drama into womens rights at first on CNN. Which is total BS they are not out protesting for womens rights. I dont doubt they have but thats not the current protest.

However that will psychologically program american females very quickly thinking women are being beaten somewhere wanting to take off their burka or whatever. In turn the female will teach the children that Iran is evil and the husband will hear the argument from the female as well. Its social psychology in its prime. 1 person affecting your entire household (group) thru one person (the mom).

Last Edited by Memysabu on 06/22/2009 08:19 AM

Interesting analysis but the guy that shot up the museum was definitely off the reservation. Maybe they thought you were defending him. But like I said, that is an interesting angle.

Those who frame up other people will have to answer for it one day...

Exd 20:16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Exd 23:1 Thou shalt not raise a false report: put not thine hand with the wicked to be an unrighteous witness.
Exd 23:7 Keep thee far from a false matter; and the innocent and righteous slay thou not: for I will not justify the wicked.
Deu 5:20 Neither shalt thou bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Deu 19:16 If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him [that which is] wrong;
Deu 19:18 And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, [if] the witness [be] a false witness, [and] hath testified falsely against his brother;

Banned for life? And yet you can post on GLP from (presumably) beyond the grave.

This is where you should post, we do not discriminate against the mentally ill or the mortally challenged.

What did you write ?

Same thing happens here too, OP. And other forums as well. It's just that you don't get to see it happen.

Except John Lear is full of shit.

But it's the same thing on this site. If you post something one of the modtards or certain members don't agree with you are banned.

Welcome to the internet, slick, that's how it works. Frustrated powerless people on the fringes of society become moderators and take power trips so they can feel a little bit of power.

If Trinity wants to ban someone or Skeptic Overlord wants to ban someone though, it's their site so it's fine, they don't fucking owe you nothing.

ATS is a boring site full of anal retentive morons who'd rather make sure the threads are organized properly than content.

Fuck that shitty stupid site.

Yeh you know I thought about similar things everytime I made a post there. However I asked myself, why do I need to appologize to everyone to make a post? That makes no dam sense, if your feelings get hurt that easily why in the hell are you on the internet? I look at everything thru a scientific point of view. I had no ones feelings in mind and mean nothing bad by anything I post.

However some women went completely off on me for posting that. Just backs up my point, women dont think logically. They think emotionally. Hell there have been books written on it. I love women Ive just never met one I can talk about the chemical composition of ascetic acid or the mating habits of south american ants with.

I can go on forever, although if you look closely youll see I had to appologize to make this post. Seeing my whole point?

Last Edited by Memysabu on 06/22/2009 08:40 AM

I said that in my post. I dunno if he was full of shit but I do know his claims are quite out there. I just refrain from calling anyone a liar. Unless I have factual evidence showing they are. I mean Im pretty sure people dont live on the moon however I havent been there.

Last Edited by Memysabu on 06/22/2009 08:42 AM

So I dont get banned here as well. Here is one of the first things that comes up on google when you search.


[link to www.bixlerconsulting.com]


It proves Im right. Or atleast gives credit to the theory. Im sure I could track down a scientific paper written over the very subject backing me up but I dont feel the need. I figured everyones brain worked well enough to see that what I posted was a scientific argument not a personal opinion.

Last Edited by Memysabu on 06/22/2009 08:50 AM

this post is very ironic

Interesting angle on the DC shooter; but from reading your posts and your take on women I would surmise that you are probably still in your early 20s. It is a general overview and sounds somewhat Freudian in nature. If stating something like that and you want to appear logical scientific were are the statistics on your presumptions?

As a women, I can agree that as a generality women tend to react emotionally initially. Is this wrong? Yes and no. Yes, it's wrong if the female does not learn to control the emotions and think logically. No, it is not wrong as there are times/situations that need immediate emotional response (child in danger, putting your life at risk to save another).

Learn to look at all sides of an issue and play devil's advocate with your initial conclusion to find any flaws and/or assumptions.

I just posted proof of argument( [link to www.bixlerconsulting.com] And the article was written by women. I can post more if you like but they bring up plenty of arguments for my point. And no one was insulting you, however being a women maybe you take it as an insult? Because you think emotionally? Seeing what Im getting at? No offense intended of course.

Last Edited by Memysabu on 06/22/2009 09:11 AM

LOL, not insulted at all, I have very thick skin. As you get older you learn what is worth getting your panties in a wad. This isn't. Why is thinking emotionally a bad thing? If done with exclusivity yes, if tempered it shows compassion. As stated previously many react initially with emotion. I can be very logical and look at all correlations without an excess of emotion; but, yes in the background I am also thinking will this physically hurt someone. I believe that is also called a conscience.

Take care and again, when making an assumption try finding all angles of the argument and refute/prove the angle that doesn't fit your assumption.

Woman=1 Women=2 It's really annoying to us nerds when you use the women when you mean woman.

[link to www.cnn.com]

Teh sekret code

Assholes
Tardos
Shitstains

the only good thing about ats posters is they will make great cannon fodder

are you expecting rational behavior from someone with "Overlord" in their name?

Anyhow, Ill stop getting off topic. The only point I was making was that the MSM specifically targets females to change the opinion of Americans. AJ just covered something similar to this the other day. The reptilian brain. If you can target it you can get reaction and people usually have no control over it.

You have adults and children in the USA being abused everyday. However you dont hear about it in the news like you hear about Iran. We dont really know what happend to "Neda" but you see this graphic video of some girl spitting up blood and dying. I dont know if it was Iran or if it was done by the CIA or what.

But thats what Im getting at, its a perfect social psychological programming method. That will generate an emotional response from any female almost immediately and shes going to talk about it to other people. To me this is very similar to what AJ was refering to about the reptilian brain and how we are being programmed by the MSM.

Heres a quote first site that comes up when I google something about social psychology.

"is in finding the way advertising affects a culture and large groups of people simultaneously"

[link to articles.directorym.com]

Seeing a pattern?

[link to www.cia-on-campus.org]

Proof the CIA hires these people and does continued research into social sciences. I think my point is made. Ill create a new thread with actual media cut outs to address later. The title of this thread makes it off topic, but I cant help but wonder if I posted a little to much truth on ATS and was banned because its a CIA front.

I got banned here last fall. I went to ATS and signed up. I got banned there and they havent lifted it. I guess my comment about being the only one there that was ever truly ATS pissed them off.

Last Edited by Douggie on 06/22/2009 09:30 AM

You have a bad attitudey! you need rehab! Back in the barrel you go!

maybe I can throw some oppinion to possibly although strangely back this up, im a man although in the past few years ive become very femine, something thats indeed been supported by the women in my life, I used to be a person who didnt give a shit about anyone and yet these days intouch with my femine side theres a certain kinship with all women of the world.. if I see a man as previously discribed in a terrible state I wouldnt give it a second though.. but the fact that a woman has been shot and killed indeed fires up my very essence as a human being, its something i want to prevent, help and indeed fight for.. I cant exactly speak for women being a man myself but as a man who has embraced my female side.. im atleast partly qualified to say that yes exactly what your saying is true.. if you want to involve the worlds sympathy.. get the word out.. spark outrage.. then involve a woman.. its the very same ideals that jessica lynch of the iraq war and suchlike tried to spark, I dare say that your 100% right with this..and all the power to you.. im glad you posted it here on GLP because I dont visit ATS anymore and I wouldnt have seen it

yup.
been there...
posted only twice.
out the door to me !
i guess i am uncontrolable.
or unpredictable.
unprofilable.
free thinker.
and a wee bit eccentric.

i think it is funny.