guys all info has just gone to NO DATA on the stereo site
Quoting: annoyedbylies 717640
no its not. We the people
Are so fucking tired
Of all the corruption
And lies
This is Critical Mass
This is a system crash
Here and now
We'll rip and tear it down
And start over again
Cause we got nothing
To lose
And we got nothing
But time
Cause the spirit
Never dies
And we know about the lies
And they playin both sides
ANd they conquer
And divide
And we decided
That we want it to end ~ Hed PE
annoyedbylies User ID: 717640 United Kingdom 7/3/2009 8:55 PM
u mean this?
Both STEREO spacecraft are currently performing as expected and taking science data on a regular basis.
The STEREO Science Center website went offline on June 22, 2009. Currently, we're running a minimal website with some, but not all, of the functionality of the original website. Please excuse us while we try to address the problem.
[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov] We the people
Are so fucking tired
Of all the corruption
And lies
This is Critical Mass
This is a system crash
Here and now
We'll rip and tear it down
And start over again
Cause we got nothing
To lose
And we got nothing
But time
Cause the spirit
Never dies
And we know about the lies
And they playin both sides
ANd they conquer
And divide
And we decided
That we want it to end ~ Hed PE
Anonymous Coward User ID: 713628 New Zealand 7/3/2009 9:00 PM
It's actually been functioning properly up until now. Where it says NO DATA there have been pictures, that were updated.
And our satellite does not show any recent pictures anymore.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 695331 Canada 7/3/2009 9:02 PM
On the last animation from stereoB it appears that the object is traveling east to west, but if camera is behind it is really going west to east !
So stereoA which is ahead and not behind gives the impression that the object is not really going east to west but west to east... (wait a minute i`m getting myself confused here) StereoB is behind therefore east to west as we see it is really west to east and the same cannot be said of stereoA as its in front and what we see is object should travel west to east and it is west to east as its infront of earth and not behind.
In conclusion the Occulting disc should mask the object that is traveling east to west as we see it, but is really travelling west to east and should emerge opposite side travelling east to west and is travelling east to west as stereoA is ahead and is true reflection as we see it. This is only true if the object is Mercury, but if it is not it will just be consumed by the occulting disc and will not re-appear from behind as stereoA is ahead of the Earth and not behind !!!! (Feck Me) .......
Hold on will be baack after I check some more Data.....
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 529850
annoyedbylies User ID: 717640 United Kingdom 7/3/2009 9:02 PM
The horrible thing is NOT that a NASA HOAX thread got 30,000+ clicks yesterday. It is that you did not get what the hoax is
Thread "Unknown object quickly approaching the Sun" got 30,000+ clicks in one day, until it finally became clear that the "unknown object" was Mercury.
Anyone who had understood the words of TRUE Prophet explaining the types of NASA Hoaxes (1) would immediately realize the hoax.
The horrible thing is NOT that a NASA HOAX thread got 30,000+ clicks yesterday. It is that you did not get what the hoax is, despite that it all was explaiend long ago.
Notes
(1) [link to www.google.com]
the Path to the TRUTH returns it immediately:
15 Jun 2007 ... Five Basic Types of NASA Hoaxes - most were exposed first by Prophet - Latest: Skylab v ISS: toilet jokes: 30 years later - Russia
Anonymous Coward User ID: 717653 United States 7/3/2009 9:08 PM
On the last animation from stereoB it appears that the object is traveling east to west, but if camera is behind it is really going west to east !
So stereoA which is ahead and not behind gives the impression that the object is not really going east to west but west to east... (wait a minute i`m getting myself confused here) StereoB is behind therefore east to west as we see it is really west to east and the same cannot be said of stereoA as its in front and what we see is object should travel west to east and it is west to east as its infront of earth and not behind.
In conclusion the Occulting disc should mask the object that is traveling east to west as we see it, but is really travelling west to east and should emerge opposite side travelling east to west and is travelling east to west as stereoA is ahead and is true reflection as we see it. This is only true if the object is Mercury, but if it is not it will just be consumed by the occulting disc and will not re-appear from behind as stereoA is ahead of the Earth and not behind !!!! (Feck Me) .......
Hold on will be baack after I check some more Data.....
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 611930
Stereo Behind only sees 1/4 of the back of the sun, and the object would still be seen moving eastward from this viewpoint.
I attempted to see check the past images and that part of the website is not loading, where you can select what you wish to see. I have tried twice. Seeking Visionaries, who can and will create the many moronic missions I need to heap on Earth and her peoples, and bring boredom. Seeking those who can constantly expand the truth into fiction and will strive earnestly to stand in the way of truth 100% of the time, making every moment of every day, a Hokey Event. TWO OR MORE IN MY NAME. ~ www.Redundantdope.net
Anonymous Coward User ID: 673314 United Kingdom 7/3/2009 9:13 PM
this is the latest compilation of photos. check it out... the sun lets out a huge burst of energy towards the unknown object, yet the object remains unrelentlessly on path for a collision with the sun later on today.
I looked at SOHO C3 camera for last week and NOTHING is incoming to the Sun on C3 Lasco/Soho.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 717261
Well, not so fast.
Here is what the OP said about SOHO and these new types of comets,
Comet C/2009 G1 could not be seen by Soho either . That is why it was known as a Stereo Comet and it did not belong to any of the Comet family groups that belong to SOHO the typical ones SOHO Kreutz-group,SOHO Non-Kreutz . So some objects can not be seen by SOHO perhaps because the size or the angle they are moving in at just as Comet C/2009 G1 was
Out of curiosity, I decided to do some work with the CME impact section of images, as there has been some debate about whether or not this object was close enough to cause the CME to wake outward.
First, I made an animated gif of the sequence, but it's too big to make a custom smiley. You can DL it here:
I brightened the image, boosted the contrast, and added noise and sharpening filters to bring out detail.
Now, I believe the object did not cause a wake in the CME. In the following diagram, you can see the definitive appearance (from our POV) of five bulbous sections of the CME. Those same 5 basic areas seem intact on the other side of the object.
:cmeanalysi:
So I believe we can rule out the wake theory.
Quoting: Moncrieffe
Excellent work! Acceptable explanation, too.
Now. Why does this object not show up on LASCO C3 and C2?
Anonymous Coward User ID: 717633 Brazil 7/3/2009 9:32 PM
So NASA has commented on this?
............................................. The guy listed as the contact on the STEREO website answered an email asking what the object was, and said he thought it was probably Venus, but copied in some colleagues who he thought would know more. They later got back to him saying it was more likely Mercury, since Venus would be out of shot at the moment, and he forwarded their opinion on too. The emails are somewhere _way_ back in this thread.
So, not quite an official statement, but consensus among NASA contacts is that it's probably Mercury. Surprising degree of uncertainty.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 660262
Good summary about NASA's opinion on this "object".
Well the "uncertainty" is not so surprising, you know "never a straight answer"...
Anonymous Coward User ID: 709535 United States 7/3/2009 9:33 PM
I had to scan through it manually. It's dark, then it gets real light in the middle and on till the end.
hmmm . . .
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 709535
I believe the "object" is accelerating. It's speed was approximately constant in the first two days but seems to have noticeably increased in the last few hours.
This acceleration is similar what we see in that movie posted a few pages back, of two comets falling into the Sun, followed by a large flare.
Right now, my opinion is that it will *really* fall into the Sun in the next few hours.
We have to wait and see though.
Anonymous Coward User ID: 717633 Brazil 7/3/2009 9:47 PM
Just checked the simulation...
The sun images are taken from the earth, so in the java sim. you have to turn everything around, so it shows the Earth in the front, the Sun in the middle and Mercury in the background, but then, Mercury moves from left to right... so it can't be it.
Can anyone else double check ??
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 536158
Yes, the OP had pointed this out too.
Mercury, when it shows on the images, will be moving from "left" to "right", while the object of this thread is moving exactly in the opposite direction. [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
If the object doesn't fall into the Sun it will probably pass by Mercury on July 6th moving opposite to it.
Moncrieffe User ID: 538386 United States 7/3/2009 9:54 PM
Okay, I need help from those more in the "know" for some of this stuff. I isolated a frame of this object, and created these variations that might help shed some light on what this is:
It appears to have a core light source (very strong), one level of immediate halo, and one level of extended halo. I am not really very knowledegable is this area, does anyone know if this is behavior to expect with a planet or not? It seems to me if it were strictly the sun reflecting off a planet, you would not see such a stepped halo level in the images, they would be more evenly distributed. I would think the different halo levels would be indicative of self-illumination.
Just playing around with the simulator and March the 20th Mercury was in a similar position it is now. If anyone can find the Stereo-B images from that date you can double check whether is Mercury or something else.
Ok, that does me, I am convinced now, going to bed...........
Okay, I need help from those more in the "know" for some of this stuff. I isolated a frame of this object, and created these variations that might help shed some light on what this is:
:sunobjhalo:
It appears to have a core light source (very strong), one level of immediate halo, and one level of extended halo. I am not really very knowledegable is this area, does anyone know if this is behavior to expect with a planet or not? It seems to me if it were strictly the sun reflecting off a planet, you would not see such a stepped halo level in the images, they would be more evenly distributed. I would think the different halo levels would be indicative of self-illumination.
Quoting: Moncrieffe
Hi Moncrieffe, please take a look at the following video of comet C/2009 G1, posted by the OP at pg2,
[link to www.youtube.com]
it shows similar characteristics of both form and luminosity as the present object.
My guess, following the OP, is that the object is a comet.
Moncrieffe User ID: 538386 United States 7/3/2009 10:08 PM
Disclaimer: This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality
or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every
effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually
review each and every one of the more than 10,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.
The content of post
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in
no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of
the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or
administration of GodlikeProductions.
This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please visit: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.
Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.
New Zealand
United Kingdom
United States
Canada
Brazil
