It would be interesting, for example, if you could get a close up on those pictures showing two sources of light close together, like the following one of Jul/03
I'm working on it....seems their available .fits files only range up to the 2nd of the month.
I'm looking elsewhere for now to see if I can find the data.
Great!
Things still seem fishy here because the dots are not connecting as easily as they should, for an object as well known as Mercury is supposed to be.
I'm looking for other images from previous sequences of COR1 and COR2 to compare with the present ones to see if they bring some enlightenment on this puzzle.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 718159
The last time Mercury was in this position for Stereo-B was about Mar 15 2009, and the "STEREO Daily Browse Images and Plots" page at
[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
can only access images back to a month ago, so ...
Just wanted to stop in at a forum I used to visit regularly and say thanks. The posts here steered me towards rational thought and critical thinking due to the exceptional amount of stupid bullshit posted here. Of course my change of mind led to many heated exchanges, but that's what you get when dealing with those blinded by faith in an idea. (Or in the case of conspiracies, a narrative)
It would be interesting, for example, if you could get a close up on those pictures showing two sources of light close together, like the following one of Jul/03
..............
I'm working on it....seems their available .fits files only range up to the 2nd of the month.
I'm looking elsewhere for now to see if I can find the data.
...............
Great!
Things still seem fishy here because the dots are not connecting as easily as they should, for an object as well known as Mercury is supposed to be.
I'm looking for other images from previous sequences of COR1 and COR2 to compare with the present ones to see if they bring some enlightenment on this puzzle.
............................
The last time Mercury was in this position for Stereo-B was about Mar 15 2009, and the "STEREO Daily Browse Images and Plots" page at
[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
can only access images back to a month ago, so ...
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 713628
I have downloaded the all images from COR2-B from Mar/18/09 to Mar/22/09 (initial 5 hours) using the ftp connection which permits to download batches of files. You go to
ftp://stereoftp.nascom.nasa.gov
then cd to "pub/browse/2009/03/dd/behind/cor2/1024", where "dd" is the day you want. I use "total-commander" ( [link to www.ghisler.com] ), which permits batch downloads from ftp connections.
The pictures show an "object" approximately twice slower than the object shown in the COR2 images of this thread and moving from left to right.
Therefore Mercury in those pics is supposed to be farther away than the object in the present thread and nonetheless the present object is nearly twice as fast.
As someone said previously here we're dealing with some turbo-Mercury here or it's not Mercury at all.
I'll try to make a movie of the two sets of pictures and post them, but I don't know how successful I can be on this specific task!:-)
...........................................................
....
Therefore Mercury in those pics is supposed to be closer than the object in the present thread and nonetheless the present object is nearly twice as fast.
.................
"At aphelion, Mercury is over 20% further from the Sun than normal, and as a result, moves about 17% slower than normal, in its orbit around the Sun; and, being 20% further away than usual, even if it were moving at the same speed as usual, it would LOOK like it was moving slower (that is, it would move at a slower angular velocity), as seen from the Sun. The net result is that the orbital motion of four degrees per day, on the average, slows to only 2/3 of that, or less than three degrees per day. "
Mercury's orbit is far from circular, so the orbital speed varies a lot from slowest to fastest. This would account for the different observed speeds across the images at different times.
Just wanted to stop in at a forum I used to visit regularly and say thanks. The posts here steered me towards rational thought and critical thinking due to the exceptional amount of stupid bullshit posted here. Of course my change of mind led to many heated exchanges, but that's what you get when dealing with those blinded by faith in an idea. (Or in the case of conspiracies, a narrative)
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 718423
Why bother just GO away. No you will NOT be missed.
Bye.
Can you draw a circle around it for me? I can't seem to find it in that picture... And all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "save us!"
And the object that you all see in these SOHO and STEREO images is at least four times the size of Earth!
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 688092
NASA says "The STEREO space weather beacon telemetry mode is a very low rate, highly compressed data stream broadcast by the spacecraft 24 hours per day. These data are used for space weather forecasting. Because of the large compression factors used, these beacon images are of much lower quality than the actual science data."
[link to stereo-ssc.nascom.nasa.gov]
and it is VERY bright in that position directly opposite the Sun from Stereo-B.
Grandmaster Nimzo User ID: 462458 7/5/2009 6:10 AM
I didnt read through 52 pages...but did anyone point out that the freaking "wings" are planet markers that are added to the picture to indicate that its a freaking planet?
We've so been down this road...over and over again...
I didnt read through 52 pages...but did anyone point out that the freaking "wings" are planet markers that are added to the picture to indicate that its a freaking planet?
We've so been down this road...over and over again...
I didnt read through 52 pages...but did anyone point out that the freaking "wings" are planet markers that are added to the picture to indicate that its a freaking planet?
We've so been down this road...over and over again...
Quoting: Dexter 683496
I've read all 52 pgs (maybe you should), and you are the first person to make a big deal about "wings".
read the thread or go away
Last Edited by Um, Huh? on 7/5/2009 at 7:40 AM Gustatus Similis Pullus
I didnt read through 52 pages...but did anyone point out that the freaking "wings" are planet markers that are added to the picture to indicate that its a freaking planet?
We've so been down this road...over and over again...
I've read all 52 pgs (maybe you should), and you are the first person to make a big deal about "wings".
read the thread or go away
Quoting: Um, Huh?
THANK YOU!! And to everyone who thinks it's not mercury. Even if an object 4 times the size of Earth hit the Sun, I highly doubt it would have any major effect on us except a light show for astronomers. That's right, I said it!
Disclaimer: This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality
or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every
effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually
review each and every one of the more than 10,000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis.
The content of post
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in
no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of
the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or
administration of GodlikeProductions.
This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.
Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.
This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.
Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.
We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information please visit: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Please be aware any communications sent complaining about a post on this website may be posted publicly at the discretion of the administration.
This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.
Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.
