Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,139 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,427,825
Pageviews Today: 2,041,400Threads Today: 447Posts Today: 12,077
08:00 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Clash With Congress: Obama Threatens Veto Of Intelligence Funding Bill

 
$$PLAYAS
User ID: 717656
United States
07/09/2009 12:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Clash With Congress: Obama Threatens Veto Of Intelligence Funding Bill
The Obama administration has threatened to veto the funding bill for US intelligence agencies because the House included a provision that would increase the number of members who receive briefings on highly secretive covert operations.

The provision, section 321 of the Intelligence Authorization Act of 2010, would require intelligence agencies to brief all members of the House and Senate intelligence committees virtually every sensitive classified project, including "special access programs" that have traditionally been orally briefed to the "Gang of 8," the chairs ranking members of the intel committees, the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House of Representatives, and the majority and minority leaders of the Senate.

The same provision allows Congress, not the administration, to restrict the briefings in extraordinary circumstances.

This seemingly small change to the law is what's provoked the veto threat. The Obama administration, like all previous administrations of the modern era, believe that the president, and only the president, has the power to determine what constitutes national security information and, even more vitally, what safeguards ought to be in place to protect the information.

Section 321 chips away at that power and simultaneously expands the scope of the briefings that the administration would be required to give.

The Gang of 8 process is much derided by critics who argue that intelligence oversight cannot be effective unless full oversight committees are fully briefed, and unless the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches over control of classified information shifts in Congress's favor.

"There is a long tradition spanning decades of comity between the branches regarding intelligence matters, and the Administration has emphasized the importance of providing timely and complete congressional notification, and using "Gang of 8" limitations only to meet extraordinary circumstances affecting the vital interests of the United States," the administration writes. "Unfortunately, section 321 undermines this fundamental compact between the Congress and the President as embodied in Title V of the National Security Act regarding the reporting of sensitive intelligence matters - an arrangement that for decades has balanced congressional oversight responsibilities with the President's responsibility to protect sensitive national security information. Section 321 would run afoul of tradition by restricting an important established means by which the President protects the most sensitive intelligence activities that are carried out in the Nation's vital national security interests."

The administration also objects to language that would subject internal executive branch legal deliberations over intelligence policy to the congressional oversight process.

Elsewhere in the statement, the administration chides Congress for its proposal to establish an inspector general with oversight responsibilities for the entire intelligence community. Why? It might constraint the president's "constitutional authority to review and, if appropriate, control disclosure of certain classified information."

The theme of this memo, and of the administration's defense of the state secrets doctrine, is that President Obama believes that the executive branch, and only the executive branch, controls the release of classified information. The bright line they've drawn here is not a-historical, but given recent history, it will provoke a clash with Congress, and, down the line, trigger a major Supreme Court case.

Congressional sources say that the White House veto threat will be sufficient to persuade House Democrats to remove the provision from the bill, which was scheduled to be debated tomorrow.

[link to politics.theatlantic.com]
SHRModerator
Forum Administrator

07/09/2009 12:31 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Clash With Congress: Obama Threatens Veto Of Intelligence Funding Bill
Lol....Nancy won't let him. She wants to be able to spread the blame around when she is asked about some fuckup she was made aware of, but wants to plead dumb over...."Well they knew too!, so can't blame me!"

He'll sign it after she tightens his happy ass up.....
____________________________________________________
E-mail anytime SHRGLP@Yahoo.com
Inquiring about a ban?, include the IP address found here. [link to www.showmemyip.com]

Ooooh, see the fire is sweepin' Our very streets today...
Burns like a red coal carpet, Mad bulls lost the way...
War, children, it's just a shot away...it's just a shot away....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 718263
United States
07/09/2009 12:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Clash With Congress: Obama Threatens Veto Of Intelligence Funding Bill
Lol....Nancy won't let him. She wants to be able to spread the blame around when she is asked about some fuckup she was made aware of, but wants to plead dumb over...."Well they knew too!, so can't blame me!"

He'll sign it after she tightens his happy ass up.....
 Quoting: SHR


Nazi Pelosi: What a TWAT.

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob