TO ALL THE OBAMA BASHER AND WHO QUESTION HIS BIRTH RIGHT IN THIS COUNTRY !!!!!!

You accept your chains well.

Not much time left, you better take them off while you still can.

you're dumb and not to bright and paranoid , grow up and go outside for a change

PRESINENT OBAMA..... tear down this wall!!!

I'm guessing you somehow benefit from the welfare state.. well good for you asshole.. you are best payed slave in history!



go fuck yourself.


when there is no food on the shelves, have fun at the fema camps..

Seems like grammar isn't a strong attribute of yours. You should work on that as well.

Dear OP. Please feel free to stick that middle finger up your rear.

I agree with OP , these Idiots here need to grow up , Obama was left a huge mess , 2 wars , housing crisis , wallstreet mess, deficit , ect ect , he had to spend all this money to save our ass's , this lets you know how bad buch left this country in , good thread , thanks.

Free world???






Wait. I wasn't finished.





Fuck you very much for reading OP.

werent you seen on tv fainting in the presence of his holiness? yeah, i bet that was you.

No, No! Encourage this one to keep his chains firmly secured!

proof positive that indeed we are all bozos on this bus

Save our asses? Look around, do some research, put two and two together, this corrupt government is going down. Any rational human being will see the obvious.

But then again, that could be asking too much of you.

no . but I think that you are tho , go back to school and come back to this thread in 14 years because that's how long it's going to take you to understand this thread ,

It is our business. We won't shut up or go away until he stops hiding whatever he is hiding.

hahahaha , that was the funniest come back I had ever seen

Obama is not qualified to be President. I have the right as an American to question his nationality status. GLP raised fingers notwithstanding... In return, I raise Old Glory.

by that time you should have made it to 6th grade

Obama is NOT an Article II Natural Born Citizen and therefore is NOT Eligible to be President


The President and CINC of the USA Must be a .Natural Born. Citizen . U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5
No Person except a
natural born Citizen, or
a Citizen of the United
States, at the time of
the Adoption of this
Constitution, shall be
eligible to the Office
of President
Obama’s Father Was
Not a U.S. Citizen, nor
Was He an Immigrant
to the USA, nor Was
He Even a Permanent
Resident of the USA
The Law of
Nations,Vattel, 1758,
Chapter 19, Section 212:
.natural-born citizens, are
those born in the country,
of parents who are citizens.
Article II .Natural Born Citizen. Means Unity of Citizenship At Birth
Article II of our Constitution has a lot
to say about how a would-be President
is born. .Natural born Citizen. status
requires not only birth on U.S. soil but also
birth to parents who are both U.S. citizens
by birth or naturalization. This unity of
jus soli (soil) and jus sanguinis (descent)
in the child at the time of birth assures
that the child is born with sole allegiance
(obligation of delity and obedience to
government in consideration for protection
that government gives (U.S. v. Kuhn, 49
F.Supp.407, 414 (D.C.N.Y)) and loyalty to
the United States and that no other nation
can lay any claim to the child.s (later an
adult) allegiance and loyalty. Indeed,
under such birth circumstances, no other
nation can legally or morally demand
any military or political obligations from
that person. The child, as he/she grows,
will also have a better chance of not
psychologically struggling with conicted
allegiance and loyalty to any other nation.
Unity of citizenship is based on the
teachings of the law of nature (natural law)
and the law of nations, as conrmed by
ancient Greek and Roman law; American,
European, and English constitutions,
common and civil law, and statutes; and
Vattel.s, The Law of Nations, all of which
the Founding Fathers read and understood.
These sources have taught civilizations
from time immemorial that a person
gains allegiance and loyalty and therefore
attachment for a nation from either being
born on the soil of the community dening
that nation or from being born to parents
who were also born on that same soil
or who naturalized as though they were
born on that soil. It is only by combining
at birth in the child both means to inherit
these two sources of citizenship that the
child by nature and therefore also by
law is born with only one allegiance and
loyalty to and consequently attachment
for only the United States.


Our Constitution requires unity of U.S.
citizenship from birth only for the Ofce
of President and Commander in Chief of
the Military, given the unique nature of
the position, a position that empowers
one person to decide whether our national
survival requires the destruction of or a
nuclear attack on or some less military
measure against another nation or group.
It is required of the President because such
a status gives the American people the
best Constitutional chance that a wouldbe
President will not have any foreign
inuences which because of conict of
conscience can most certainly taint his/
her critical decisions made when leading
the nation. Hence, the special status is
a Constitutional eligibility requirement
to be President and thereby to be vested
with the sole power to decide the fate
and survival of the American people.
Of course, the status, being a minimum
Constitutional requirement, does not
guarantee that a would-be President will
have love and fealty only for the United
States. Therefore, the nal informed and
intelligent decision on who the President
will be is left to the voters, the Electors,
and Congress at the Joint Session, to
whom hopefully responsible media and
political institutions will have provided
all the necessary vetting information
concerning the candidate.s character and
qualications to be President.
Through historical development, unity of
citizenship and sole allegiance at birth is
not required for U.S. born citizen Senators,
Representatives, and regular citizens under
the 14th Amendment and Congressional
enactments. In contradiction and which
conrms the Founding Fathers. meaning
of what a .natural born Citizen. is,
naturalized citizens, since 1795, before
becoming such must swear an oath that
they renounce all other allegiances to
other nations. During the Washington


Administration, the First Congress
passed the Naturalization Act of 1795 in
which it provided that new citizens take
a solemn oath to support the Constitution
and .renounce. all .allegiance. to
their former political regimes. This is
during the time that most of the Framers
were alive and still actively involved in
guiding and forming the new national
government and Constitutional Republic.
Today, we still require that an alien upon
being naturalized must give an oath that
he/she renounces all former allegiances
and that he/she will .support and defend
the Constitution and laws of the United
States of America against all enemies,
foreign and domestic.. Hence, allegiance
is not simply a thing of the past but very
much with us today. It is important to
also understand that naturalization takes
an alien back to the moment of birth and
by law changes that alien.s birth status.
In other words, naturalization, which by
legal denition requires sole allegiance to
the United States, re-creates the individual
as though he were a born Citizen but only
does it by law and not by nature. This
is the reason that the 14th Amendment
considers a naturalized person to be a
.citizen. of the United States and not
a .natural born Citizen. of the United
States. This recreation of birth status
through naturalization which also existed
under English common law also probably
explains why John Jay underlined the
word .born. when he recommended to
General Washington that only a .natural
born Citizen. (as to say born in fact, by
nature, and not by law) be allowed to
be President. Consequently, naturalized
citizens stand on an equal footing with
born Citizens (who are so recognized and
conrmed by the 14th Amendment or by
an Act of Congress and who can be but
not necessarily are also .natural born
Citizens.) except that they cannot be
President or Vice President, for they were


born with an allegiance not owing to the
United States and acquire that allegiance
only after birth. Surely, if a naturalized
citizen, even though having sole allegiance
to the United States, is not Constitutionally
eligible to be President, we cannot expect
any less of someone who we are willing
to declare so Constitutionally eligible.
The Founding Fathers emphasized
that, for the sake of the survival of the
Constitutional Republic, the Ofce of
President and Commander in Chief of the
Military be free of foreign inuence and
intrigue. It is the .natural born Citizen.
clause that gives the American people the
best ghting chance to keep it that way for
generations to come. American people do
not have the Constitutional right to have
any certain person be President. But for the
reasons stated above, minimally they do
have a Constitutional right to protect their
liberty by knowing and assuring that their
President is Constitutionally eligible and
qualied to hold the Ofce of President
and Commander in Chief of the Military.


. Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
Obama is not Article II Constitutionally
eligible to be President. Q.E.D.
. Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., Lead Plaintiff
Commander USNR Retired



If you would like to help with
this lawsuit, please contact
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
185 Gatzmer Avenue
Jamesburg NJ 08831
Email: [email protected]
TEL: 732-521-1900
FAX: 732-521-3906
BLOG: [link to puzo1.blogspot.com]
Paid for by: Concerned Americans contributing at ProtectOurLiberty.org in support of the Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al lawsuit.



** Update and clarification from Charles Kerchner 7/13/09 **

“To clarify and help people find the correct newspaper in print, you may wish to change the headline to read, “Washington Times National Weekly edition”, instead of just using the name Washington Times. Some may think it is in the daily paper which it is not, and buy the wrong paper. I chose the National Weekly edition since it reaches all the movers and shakers nationwide. It is sold in major book store news stands. It also has about 100,000 paid subscribers nationwide who in general are the very political aware people in this country. It is also read by leading conservative writers and spokes people on radio and TV. I hope it stirs things up in DC.”

Charles F. Kerchner, Jr.
CDR USNR Retired
Lehigh Valley PA
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner v Obama & Congress

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

* Obama Natural Born Citizen?, Leo Donofrio explains, Donofrio lawsuit, US Su…
* Obama civil complaint, January 5, 2008, Send to legislators, Factcheck.org,…
* Obama not eligible, Constitutional crisis, Philip J Berg lawsuit, Electoral…
* Legislation Introduced to Remove McCain’s Panama Problem in Seeking P…

Categories: Announcements · Barack Obama · Barry Soetoro · Birth Certificate · COLB · Chief Justice · Citizens for the truth about Obama · Civil Complaint · Democrats · District Court · Election · Election 2008 · Election Law · Federal Court · Founding Fathers · Government · Hawaii · Indonesia · Judges · Justice · Kenya · Kerchner v Obama · Mario Apuzzo · Motion · Natural born citizen · News · Obama · Obama indictment · Obama records · Politics · Senator Obama · Supreme Court · Supreme Court Justice · The Case Against Barack Obama · U.S. Supreme Court · US Constitution · US Department of Justice · US District Court · United States · Usurper · Washington DC · Washington Times · indictment · voters
Tagged: 2009, July 13, Kerchner v Obama, lawsuit, Mario Apuzzo, Obama not natural born citizen, Washington Times

Nice proxy OP. It would be wise to stop while you're behind.

It happens at fucking rock concerts. God I hate regili and hannitytards. BTW I revoked my support, I still call

ever heard of NATIONAL SECURITY ? , he's the most protected man on the planet , unlike you who can't even defend your post because it's to retarded for anyone who has a college degree

Wow, so what happened, did GLP suddenly get assigned a bunch of brand-new Obamabots?

First, this topic has been discussed to death, many, many, many months before you got the bright idea to voice your opinion.

Second, and most importantly, if you can't handle someone on a conspiracy board questioning authority, then you are in the wrong place. Back to the Google boards for you OP.

lol,

Are you freaking serious? No one can be this dumb.

sorry you didn't make no sense at all , reread the thread title and the post and try again

no, you have already prove who the dumb one is , here is a little hint.....YOU.

Ha ha ha, you fuckin' retard.

You fool. You will die in your ignorance.