Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? | |
xc User ID: 707975 Belgium 07/27/2009 05:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 05:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? "Furthermore, it pulsed!" Quoting: xc 707975Can you translate Pulsed into english please! A pulse is like your heart beat! There is a regularity about it. This signal or x-ray flashes/pulses at regular intervals of 45mins! It would be interesting to know if this is still the same today or if it has changed. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 690980 United States 07/27/2009 05:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 05:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? Didn't Velikovsky predict pulses eminating from Jupiter, and the entire scientific establishment branded him a nutjob? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 690980Don't know, maybe! That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 05:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 06:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? "In July 1992 the orbit of Shoemaker-Levy 9 passed within Jupiter's Roche limit, and Jupiter's tidal forces acted to pull the comet apart. SL9 was later observed as a series of fragments ranging up to 2 km (1.2 mi) in diameter. These fragments collided with Jupiter's southern hemisphere between July 16 and July 22, 1994, at a speed of approximately 60 km/s (37 mi/s). The prominent scars from the impacts were more easily visible than the Great Red Spot and persisted for many months." Quoting: Anonymous Coward 703772Interesting timing! July 16 & 22 Last Edited by Ozicell on 07/27/2009 06:01 AM That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 168711 Germany 07/27/2009 06:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 06:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 06:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 06:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? Did the Shoemaker Levy spots grow like this one? Quoting: Ozicell:Jupiter 16: Does anyone have a link to a more recent picture or comparison? That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 168711 Germany 07/27/2009 06:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? I'd say no. Quoting: OzicellTo what? To the question in the topic. The current black smudge seems to be resulting from an impact. The x-ray pulse has been observed longer. Why should they be related? All they have in common is that both have to do with jupiter, nothing else. |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 06:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? I'd say no. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 168711To what? To the question in the topic. The current black smudge seems to be resulting from an impact. The x-ray pulse has been observed longer. Why should they be related? All they have in common is that both have to do with jupiter, nothing else. Maybe but I am doubting this is from an impact! Apart from the obvious spot, there doesn't seem to be any other evidence for impact! This thing is also growing, did Shoemaker Levy grow like this? Notice it's position also relates to the images shown above! Sure, I am not a scientist nor an astronomer, I am just posing a possibility. That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Casual Observer User ID: 735270 United States 07/27/2009 06:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? Out of curiousity didn't we send a probe into Jupiter about 5 years ago that everyone was afraid would ignite it because of it's radio active payload? I'd be curious to know if the location of that impact is anywhere near the vicinity of this anomaly? |
Casual Observer User ID: 735270 United States 07/27/2009 06:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 07:08 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? Out of curiousity didn't we send a probe into Jupiter about 5 years ago that everyone was afraid would ignite it because of it's radio active payload? Quoting: Casual Observer 735270I'd be curious to know if the location of that impact is anywhere near the vicinity of this anomaly? Interesting point. That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 07:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? Out of curiousity didn't we send a probe into Jupiter about 5 years ago that everyone was afraid would ignite it because of it's radio active payload? Quoting: OzicellI'd be curious to know if the location of that impact is anywhere near the vicinity of this anomaly? Interesting point. Seems it was away from Hubble’s view when it impacted, I am still trying to find scar pics but it's not looking good! Anyway, the supposed impact site was a long way away from this anomaly. :Galileo en: This is the site where they expected Galileo to hit! That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 07:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? Out of curiousity didn't we send a probe into Jupiter about 5 years ago that everyone was afraid would ignite it because of it's radio active payload? Quoting: OzicellI'd be curious to know if the location of that impact is anywhere near the vicinity of this anomaly? Interesting point. Seems it was away from Hubble’s view when it impacted, I am still trying to find scar pics but it's not looking good! Anyway, the supposed impact site was a long way away from this anomaly. :Galileo en: This is the site where they expected Galileo to hit! Probably way too small for scar pics. That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 583160 United States 07/27/2009 08:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? Impact pic of Shoemaker Levy Quoting: Ozicell:Shoemaker : Pic of new spot :New spot: They look totally different to me! Right but that shoemaker levy pic you have up there is right after impact. That same hole also spread out exactly like the pic below it after a few days too. In fact all the SL9 impacts all expanded just like this new one is doing. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 583160 United States 07/27/2009 08:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? Did the Shoemaker Levy spots grow like this one? Quoting: Ozicell:Jupiter 16: Yes they did. There are quite a few pics of the spreading SL9 impact phenomena. That is why they predicted this one to expand out as well because they saw this same phenomena of spreading out happen to SL9. Of course it is doing exactly as predicted. |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 08:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? Impact pic of Shoemaker Levy Quoting: Anonymous Coward 583160Pic of new spot :New spot: They look totally different to me! Right but that shoemaker levy pic you have up there is right after impact. That same hole also spread out exactly like the pic below it after a few days too. In fact all the SL9 impacts all expanded just like this new one is doing. Can you point me to the pictures that support what you are saying? Thanks - much appreciated! That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 583160 United States 07/27/2009 08:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? I'd say no. Quoting: OzicellTo what? To the question in the topic. The current black smudge seems to be resulting from an impact. The x-ray pulse has been observed longer. Why should they be related? All they have in common is that both have to do with jupiter, nothing else. Maybe but I am doubting this is from an impact! Apart from the obvious spot, there doesn't seem to be any other evidence for impact! This thing is also growing, did Shoemaker Levy grow like this? Spreading SL9 impacts: [link to homeboyastronomy.com] Spreading SL9 impacts [link to www.facstaff.bucknell.edu] There is just two examples. |
Ozicell (OP) User ID: 726400 Australia 07/27/2009 08:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? I'd say no. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 583160To what? To the question in the topic. The current black smudge seems to be resulting from an impact. The x-ray pulse has been observed longer. Why should they be related? All they have in common is that both have to do with jupiter, nothing else. Maybe but I am doubting this is from an impact! Apart from the obvious spot, there doesn't seem to be any other evidence for impact! This thing is also growing, did Shoemaker Levy grow like this? Spreading SL9 impacts: [link to homeboyastronomy.com] Spreading SL9 impacts [link to www.facstaff.bucknell.edu] There is just two examples. Sorry, not good enough! Not only do you not have time stamps, but you are showing the images reversed! The second image you present are the first impacts. The first image represents a rotation of Jupiter showing subsequent impacts. They are back the front! You should have the second one first! That which is - has already been, And what is to be - has already been. Quote: King Solomon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 296013 Iraq 07/27/2009 08:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 385288 United States 07/27/2009 09:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
^ºFEEDº^ User ID: 496955 United Kingdom 07/27/2009 09:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 203360 United States 07/27/2009 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 161076 United States 07/27/2009 10:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? I did a little bit of work. Here is the original discovery image of our new impact at the south pole. Note the feature i have pointed out in the second image: [link to farm3.static.flickr.com] [link to farm3.static.flickr.com] this next image is a hubble image from jpl website which i have blown up. It shows the exact same feature as pointed out in our new impact: [link to farm3.static.flickr.com] [link to farm4.static.flickr.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 735803 Italy 07/27/2009 10:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 735805 Canada 07/27/2009 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is the new hole in Jupiter related to the regular x-ray signals discovered years ago coming from Jupiter? HA,HA,HA,HA JUPITER DOESN'T EXIST!!! JUPITER orbit:778,330,000 km (5.20 AU)from Sun diameter: 142,984 km [link to www.nineplanets.org] EARTH orbit:149,600,000 km (1.00 AU) from Sun diameter: 12,756.3 km [link to www.nineplanets.org] Magnetic field "Like Earth and many other planets, Jupiter acts like a giant magnet. The force of its magnetism extends far into space in a region surrounding the planet called its magnetic field. Jupiter's magnetic field is about 14 times as strong as Earth's, according to measurements made by spacecraft. Jupiter's magnetic field is the strongest in the solar system, except for fields associated with sunspots and other small regions on the sun's surface." [link to www.nasa.gov] Jupiter has 14 times the magnetic pull then that of Earth, but is only 5 times further, hence, 9 times stronger then the magnetic North pole, thereby, your compass needle would point towards Jupiter. "The cause of Earth's magnetic field is not known for certain, but is possibly explained by the dynamo theory. The magnetic field extends several tens of thousands of kilometers into space." [link to en.wikibooks.org] Therefore if I'm standing 100 miles (Y) from the magnetic pole (X), my compass points towards it, when I move 200 miles from the magnetic pole (2Y) my compass still points towards it because distance doesn't affect it, therewith, if Jupiter EXISTED my compass would point towards its magnetic field because its bigger and stronger then Earth's. "The movements in the liquid part of the Earth’s core are changing surprisingly quickly, and this affects the Earth’s magnetic field, according to new research from DTU Space." [link to www.sciencedaily.com] With the aforementioned no matter WHERE you stand on round spherical Earth its magnetic field would be constantly beneath you if the core/center was the reason for Earth’s magnetic field. Then with this reasoning my compass would not just point to the ground when I'd be in close proximity of the North magnetic pole but also anywhere else on the round spherical Earth, because anywhere you stand on a round spherical Earth the distance to the core/center is the same. STANDING on the Equator my COMPASS will point likewise into the GROUND. [link to martianchronicles.files.wordpress.com] Earth is flat, and when you are in close range of the center your compass needle points to the ground, anywhere else around the Flat earth the compass needle points at the center of the Earth. [link to www.lhup.edu] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 734721 United States 07/27/2009 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |