Mayan temples, Egyptian pyramids, ancient monolithic structures - How they moved the large, heavy blocks/rocks SOLVED!

sound frequency

YEAH, BUT HOW DID THEY GET THAT BIG CROSS BLOCK OVER THE TOP?

YEAH, BUT HOW DID THEY GET THAT BIG CROSS BLOCK OVER THE TOP?

YEAH, BUT HOW DID THEY GET THAT BIG CROSS BLOCK OVER THE TOP?


Yes, I was thinking the same ...but anyway:

5 stars!

YEAH, BUT HOW DID THEY GET THAT BIG CROSS BLOCK OVER THE TOP?


Wally magaged that too ... he has a website

[link to www.theforgottentechnology.com]

Wally is kick ass and makes all those "Oh, the aliens must have helped them to build this shit" -tards look like total fucktards.

sound frequency


Perhaps; but this gent uses extremely simple, yet effective techniques. He even moves a huge barn! Here, I will try to embed the video:

he may move them but lets see him move them hundreds of miles which is the distance of some of the quarrys

i am impressed by what this guy is doing, but i want to see him CUT some stones


when i look at some of these pics i have linked to below
i don't think such a "primitive" method would have been used move them


[link to i144.photobucket.com]

[link to i144.photobucket.com]

[link to i144.photobucket.com]

[link to i144.photobucket.com]

[link to i144.photobucket.com]

look at the striations in this, i have been in concrete construction for over 16 years this looks like it has been ground down with a machine
[link to i144.photobucket.com]

look at the arcs they line up perfect
they did this how?
[link to i144.photobucket.com]

these cut marks were made how
[link to i144.photobucket.com]
[link to i144.photobucket.com]

Although impressive I say, nonsense!
It took this dude, one day, one nights sleep to erect one block?
At this rate it would've taken the Pyramid builders, 2 million years to build. (okay, a half a million if there was a 'team')
Besides....this guy fails to mention how they were stacked! Now that's the BIGGEST mystery isn't it?

Listen.....the only wisdom we have is that we know nothing!

Although I sort of agree with your last sentence, the rest is simply not thought through imho. Take "dude" x 10,000 and there is your Mayan temple or Isis temple in Egpyt.

Although I sort of agree with your last sentence, the rest is simply not thought through imho. Take "dude" x 10,000 and there is your Mayan temple or Isis temple in Egpyt.



I hear ya but again, how did mere mortal-dude lift up, carry-over and perfectly align the next 300 hundred feet of pyramid?
You can't partially solve a problem and claim it's resolved!
It's one of Earths seven Wonders and it'll remain that way until we learn to think outside the confines of our 3 dimensional, 6-sense ways.

he may move them but lets see him move them hundreds of miles which is the distance of some of the quarrys

i am impressed by what this guy is doing, but i want to see him CUT some stones


when i look at some of these pics i have linked to below
i don't think such a "primitive" method would have been used move them


[link to i144.photobucket.com]

[link to i144.photobucket.com]

[link to i144.photobucket.com]

[link to i144.photobucket.com]

[link to i144.photobucket.com]

look at the striations in this, i have been in concrete construction for over 16 years this looks like it has been ground down with a machine
[link to i144.photobucket.com]

look at the arcs they line up perfect
they did this how?
[link to i144.photobucket.com]

these cut marks were made how
[link to i144.photobucket.com]
[link to i144.photobucket.com]



High pressure water will cut profiles like these
and or as i stated above these stones may well have been molded

Poured like concrete...

/HTH...

Poured like concrete...

/HTH...

i have worked in concrete construction for a very long time
these are not poured/molded

Poured like concrete...

/HTH...

i have worked in concrete construction for a very long time
these are not poured/molded

[link to www.livescience.com]

A year and a half later, after extensive scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations and other testing, Barsoum and his research group finally began to draw some conclusions about the pyramids. They found that the tiniest structures within the inner and outer casing stones were indeed consistent with a reconstituted limestone. The cement binding the limestone aggregate was either silicon dioxide (the building block of quartz) or a calcium and magnesium-rich silicate mineral.

The stones also had a high water content—unusual for the normally dry, natural limestone found on the Giza plateau—and the cementing phases, in both the inner and outer casing stones, were amorphous, in other words, their atoms were not arranged in a regular and periodic array. Sedimentary rocks such as limestone are seldom, if ever, amorphous.

The sample chemistries the researchers found do not exist anywhere in nature. “Therefore,” says Barsoum, “it’s very improbable that the outer and inner casing stones that we examined were chiseled from a natural limestone block.”

Stonehenge could of been built this way but not the Temples and Pyramids. The difference is the precision cuts in the rock, the distance from the quarry, and the lifting of stones all the way to the top of the structure.

Stonehenge could of been built this way but not the Temples and Pyramids. The difference is the precision cuts in the rock, the distance from the quarry, and the lifting of stones all the way to the top of the structure.



Wally says different,

From his site:

"I have found that ancient legends from around the world are true. Some megaliths could have been set in place by as few as one man. I could build The Great Pyramid of Giza, using my techniques and primitive tools. On a twenty-five year construction schedule, (working forty hours per week at fifty weeks per year, using the input of myself to calculate) I would need a crew of 520 people to move blocks from the main quarry to the site and another 100 to move the blocks on site. For hoisting I need a crew of 120 (40 working and 80 rotating). My crew can raise 7000 lb. 100 ft. per minute. I have found the design of the pyramid is functional in it’s own construction. No external ramp is needed."

Stonehenge could of been built this way but not the Temples and Pyramids. The difference is the precision cuts in the rock, the distance from the quarry, and the lifting of stones all the way to the top of the structure.



Wally says different,

From his site:

"I have found that ancient legends from around the world are true. Some megaliths could have been set in place by as few as one man. I could build The Great Pyramid of Giza, using my techniques and primitive tools. On a twenty-five year construction schedule, (working forty hours per week at fifty weeks per year, using the input of myself to calculate) I would need a crew of 520 people to move blocks from the main quarry to the site and another 100 to move the blocks on site. For hoisting I need a crew of 120 (40 working and 80 rotating). My crew can raise 7000 lb. 100 ft. per minute. I have found the design of the pyramid is functional in it’s own construction. No external ramp is needed."


Saying you can do something and actually doing it are 2 very different things...

*Look mum, I can fly...*