| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 | NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD?
| UNtypical USer 
Ancient of Days
User ID: 778235
10/3/2009 11:16 PM
 | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
No, Dr. Postman, I'm not bothering you.
There is absolutely nobody else on this Forum that I need to speak to that way.
There is absolutely nobody else on this Forum who spams and ridicules me to the extent I can't proceed with anything, nor simply use Reasons and Cause-and-Effect.
Commentator has such a lapse in judgment and manners, there is no civil way to deal with him. He makes unfounded and false accusations, labels, names, blames and shames in an abusive way.
So long as you don't address me the way he addresses me, you haVe nothing to fear. I will never speak to you the way I have to address that Commentator.
He is crazy, and there is nobody here to censor him; so I simply give him BACK WHATEVER he dishes out.
If you have a better idea for getting rid of his harassment, let me know, okay?
: )
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| DrPostman 
Forum Moderator
User ID: 770789
10/3/2009 11:25 PM
 | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
I wouldn't have anything to fear anyway. Both The Commentator
and myself are old usenet hands. We know when a kitchen is
hot and what to do if we don't like that.
"I've had two teenagers who were considering killing themselves, because they didn't want to
be around when the world ends. Two women in the last two weeks said they were contemplating
killing their children and themselves so they wouldn't have to suffer through the end of the world."
-- NASA Astrobiology Institute scientist David Morrison, on 2012 fears
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Battlefield Heroes is now in Open Beta
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Want to know if a site is down, or if the problem is at your end? Go to:
[link to downforeveryoneorjustme.com] |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
10/3/2009 11:58 PM
 | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
No, Dr. Postman, I'm not bothering you.
There is absolutely nobody else on this Forum that I need to speak to that way.
There is absolutely nobody else on this Forum who spams and ridicules me to the extent I can't proceed with anything, nor simply use Reasons and Cause-and-Effect.
Commentator has such a lapse in judgment and manners, there is no civil way to deal with him. He makes unfounded and false accusations, labels, names, blames and shames in an abusive way.
So long as you don't address me the way he addresses me, you haVe nothing to fear. I will never speak to you the way I have to address that Commentator.
He is crazy, and there is nobody here to censor him; so I simply give him BACK WHATEVER he dishes out.
If you have a better idea for getting rid of his harassment, let me know, okay?
: ) Quoting: UNtypical USer
Still can't figure out that your hate filled screeds are not supporting your case, emily.
Well, tell you what, you can get rid of me in a heartbeat.
All you have to do is present compelling evidence for your wild eyed notions.
But you won't do that because delusions and insanity don't make compelling arguments.
So, too hot for you, you insane, bile filled cretin? You know what you can do....
non sufficit Orbis |
| UNtypical USer
Ancient of Days
User ID: 778235
10/4/2009 12:02 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You are not human, not worth addressing.
Tomorrow I'll have more data.
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 785882
10/4/2009 1:12 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You are not human, not worth addressing.
Tomorrow I'll have more data. Quoting: UNtypical USer
No, tomorrow you will have some more lunar photos of rocks which you will claim show four morris dancers in a temple, or some such bunk.
You will then fail to indicate where they actually can be found in the photo, and cast insults at whoever asks any relevant questions. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
10/4/2009 2:50 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You are not human, not worth addressing.
Tomorrow I'll have more data. Quoting: UNtypical USer
Really? I am not human? Is that your latest delusion? Insanity must not be much fun for you, emily.
MORE data? You have yet to present ANY data! Clearly you do not know what the word means, but there are so many words you use but have no clue about no one is surprised.
Best haul your ass back to your shrink, emily.
non sufficit Orbis |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
10/4/2009 2:50 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You are not human, not worth addressing.
Tomorrow I'll have more data.
No, tomorrow you will have some more lunar photos of rocks which you will claim show four morris dancers in a temple, or some such bunk.
You will then fail to indicate where they actually can be found in the photo, and cast insults at whoever asks any relevant questions. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 785882
That pretty much sums up the old bat's method doesn't it?
non sufficit Orbis |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 786127
10/4/2009 11:10 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
No, tomorrow you will have some more lunar photos of rocks which you will claim show four morris dancers in a temple, or some such bunk.
You will then fail to indicate where they actually can be found in the photo, and cast insults at whoever asks any relevant questions.
That pretty much sums up the old bat's method doesn't it? Quoting: The Commentator
Well, I havent seen anything else from her, like maybe evidence?
It sorta goes, "If you can't see it then you are a not-see, or a shill, or a troll, etc".
Heaven forfend that UU should actually give any indication as to what we should look at in the images, or how they are people or architecture or anything at all. |
| UNtypical USer
Ancient of Days
User ID: 778235
10/4/2009 11:57 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Well, I havent seen anything else from her, like maybe evidence?
It sorta goes, "If you can't see it then you are a not-see, or a shill, or a troll, etc".
Heaven forfend that UU should actually give any indication as to what we should look at in the images, or how they are people or architecture or anything at all. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 786127
What I do is take a digital photos and put it through a sequence of steps to validate the following:
1. whether it is skewed, up-and-down turned at an angle.
2. whether camera motion has caused a "scale" defect.
3. whether any color or false color is present.
4. whether Contrast has been heightened or reversed.
That's what I do. I do not label, call out and name what's in the photo. I figure you have a brain, and you can do that for yourself if you are interested in, what's in the photo.
I will not change my method, not for you, not for anybody else.
I am a technician, not a carnival barker.
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 786021
10/4/2009 12:49 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
I am a technician, not a carnival barker. Quoting: UNtypical USer
You are however barking, mad! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 786021
10/4/2009 1:00 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
What I do is take a digital photos and put it through a sequence of steps to validate the following:
1. whether it is skewed, up-and-down turned at an angle.
2. whether camera motion has caused a "scale" defect.
3. whether any color or false color is present.
4. whether Contrast has been heightened or reversed. Quoting: UNtypical USer
1. whether it is skewed, up-and-down turned at an angle.
- How do you determine that?
2. whether camera motion has caused a "scale" defect.
How do you determine that?
3. whether any color or false color is present.
How do you determine that?
4. whether Contrast has been heightened or reversed.
How do you determine that? |
| UNtypical USer
Ancient of Days
User ID: 778235
10/4/2009 1:35 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
The skills for determining skew, scale anomalies, false color, false contrast are taught to all Xerox technical representatives.
Go get yourself hired, and then you'll know too.
Okay?
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 786021
10/4/2009 4:19 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
The skills for determining skew, scale anomalies, false color, false contrast are taught to all Xerox technical representatives.
Go get yourself hired, and then you'll know too.
Okay? Quoting: UNtypical USer
The skills for determining the size and distance of the moon are taught to all high school students in their math classes.
Get yourself an education and you can find out the information using your own brain.
Okay? |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/4/2009 4:44 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
The skills for determining skew, scale anomalies, false color, false contrast are taught to all Xerox technical representatives.
Go get yourself hired, and then you'll know too.
Okay? Quoting: UNtypical USer
You mean it's a Xerox SECRET? Ohhh PLEASE tell... PRETTY please! |
| UNtypical USer
Ancient of Days
User ID: 778235
10/4/2009 5:52 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
The OTHER digital image copier companies (especially COLOR) teach the same servicing skills.
There have been so many Japanese copier companies taking over the market, and they all train technicians to work on their machines, I'm sure you can find skilled workers to show you how.
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/4/2009 5:58 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
The OTHER digital image copier companies (especially COLOR) teach the same servicing skills.
There have been so many Japanese copier companies taking over the market, and they all train technicians to work on their machines, I'm sure you can find skilled workers to show you how. Quoting: UNtypical USer
So, if it is something one can easily find out, why won't YOU just give the information? |
| UNtypical USer
Ancient of Days
User ID: 778235
10/4/2009 7:41 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
It's a skill, like "miking a drum cavity."
It's a skill, like driving a race car.
Either you have acquired and cultivated the skill, or you haven't.
I cannot TEACH you to read.
Either you are willing to learn to read photographs, or you are NOT.
Capice?
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/4/2009 7:58 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
It's a skill, like "miking a drum cavity."
It's a skill, like driving a race car.
Either you have acquired and cultivated the skill, or you haven't.
I cannot TEACH you to read.
Either you are willing to learn to read photographs, or you are NOT.
Capice? Quoting: UNtypical USer
So you are unwilling to answer these questions, we are just supposed to take your word for what you claim to do?
1. whether it is skewed, up-and-down turned at an angle.
- How do you determine that?
2. whether camera motion has caused a "scale" defect.
How do you determine that?
3. whether any color or false color is present.
How do you determine that?
4. whether Contrast has been heightened or reversed.
How do you determine that? |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/4/2009 8:03 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Seems like this is exactly like when you claimed you could restore proper contrast and that the information to do that was preserved at pixel level. I took an image of the Moon, cranked up the contrast and challenged you to restore it. You refused. I gues that means you were simply LYING about your capabilities, Em, as you are again here. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
10/4/2009 8:05 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
No, tomorrow you will have some more lunar photos of rocks which you will claim show four morris dancers in a temple, or some such bunk.
You will then fail to indicate where they actually can be found in the photo, and cast insults at whoever asks any relevant questions.
That pretty much sums up the old bat's method doesn't it?
Well, I havent seen anything else from her, like maybe evidence?
It sorta goes, "If you can't see it then you are a not-see, or a shill, or a troll, etc".
Heaven forfend that UU should actually give any indication as to what we should look at in the images, or how they are people or architecture or anything at all. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 786127
Nope, no evidence, when asked for evidence she says it is not her job to provide evidence. Then she lets fly one of her hate and bile filled screeds, yells she used to repair copiers and runs away.
Barking mad, I say.
non sufficit Orbis |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
10/4/2009 8:12 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
It's a skill, like "miking a drum cavity."
It's a skill, like driving a race car.
Either you have acquired and cultivated the skill, or you haven't.
I cannot TEACH you to read.
Either you are willing to learn to read photographs, or you are NOT.
Capice? Quoting: UNtypical USer
You can teach skills.
You can not teach skills you do not have.
Since you can not teach the skill you claim is required you do not, in fact, have that skill.
QED.
Suck it, emily.
non sufficit Orbis |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
10/4/2009 8:19 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
The skills for determining skew, scale anomalies, false color, false contrast are taught to all Xerox technical representatives.
Go get yourself hired, and then you'll know too.
Okay?
The skills for determining the size and distance of the moon are taught to all high school students in their math classes.
Get yourself an education and you can find out the information using your own brain.
Okay? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 786021
I have made that point to emily several times, and she always ignores it.
One would think she never mastered high school math, or even attended a high school.
non sufficit Orbis |
| UNtypical USer
Ancient of Days
User ID: 778235
10/4/2009 10:24 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You make the same erroneous point over and over.
what do you want, applause?
The current way of calculating distance is not true to life because photos show features totally out of scale with it.
but you keep repeating the same position over and over.
It's not worth repeating, honestly.
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
10/4/2009 11:02 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You make the same erroneous point over and over.
what do you want, applause?
The current way of calculating distance is not true to life because photos show features totally out of scale with it.
but you keep repeating the same position over and over.
It's not worth repeating, honestly. Quoting: UNtypical USer
So long as you try so unsuccessfully to wiggle out of your responsibilities, emily, it is quite worth repeating, again and again until even the festering swamp you call a brain knows you are, well, dead, flat wrong.
So how is it that every scientist and mathematician in the last 2000 years is wrong, and you, an uneducated, ignorant, hate filled old dingbat can claim to be right?
You have to show your work, emily. It is as simple as that. No work shown, one can safely conclude you did none.
It is quite obvious to everyone but the terminally stiupid that reality tasks you, emily.
So suck it, crackpot.
non sufficit Orbis |
| UNtypical USer
Ancient of Days
User ID: 778235
10/4/2009 11:14 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You are presumptuous.
what is obvious to me is obvious to me.
I merely report it. I am under no obligation to "show my work," as you put it.
I bring my restored photos here for real honest people to look at.
That's all I do and that's all I will EVER do.
You do what you want, Bozo.
Last Edited by UNtypical USer on 10/4/2009 at 11:15 PM
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/4/2009 11:32 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You make the same erroneous point over and over.
what do you want, applause?
The current way of calculating distance is not true to life because photos show features totally out of scale with it.
but you keep repeating the same position over and over.
It's not worth repeating, honestly. Quoting: UNtypical USer
As always, you take your foolish conclusion and then throw out any and all solid evidence showing it to be wrong. Don't you understand that that is the antithesis of valid science? |
| Menow
User ID: 405501
10/4/2009 11:34 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You are presumptuous.
what is obvious to me is obvious to me.
I merely report it. I am under no obligation to "show my work," as you put it.
I bring my restored photos here for real honest people to look at.
That's all I do and that's all I will EVER do.
You do what you want, Bozo. Quoting: UNtypical USer
YOu have been challenged to show how you "restore" images. You have refused. That means you are LYING, Emily. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
10/4/2009 11:37 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You are presumptuous.
what is obvious to me is obvious to me.
I merely report it. I am under no obligation to "show my work," as you put it.
I bring my restored photos here for real honest people to look at.
That's all I do and that's all I will EVER do.
You do what you want, Bozo. Quoting: UNtypical USer
I thought you were not going to respond to me anymore, emily? Was that a LIE this time too? Guess so, that would make you what, in addition to being a hate filled, delusional old woman? What was that word, oh right, the word is LIAR.
But, we all knew you were a LIAR long ago, emily.
So, you have nothing to show? Actually....No, just your mental illness which you display with every message.
Crazy and a LIAR, must suck to be you, emily.
Last Edited by The Commentator on 10/5/2009 at 12:06 AM
non sufficit Orbis |
| UNtypical USer
Ancient of Days
User ID: 778235
10/4/2009 11:55 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
I will have more restored photos when I get around to having more restored photos--
Creep! Get outta my face!
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
10/5/2009 12:07 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
I will have more restored photos when I get around to having more restored photos--
Creep! Get outta my face! Quoting: UNtypical USer
Why should anyone take your word, you a known LIAR, for this "restoration?"
Oh right, you don't restore, you hallucinate.
Haloperidol is the word you are looking for, emily, haloperidol. Mention it to your shrink.
non sufficit Orbis |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 | |
|
