| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 | NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD?
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
 United States
8/29/2009 7:54 PM
 | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
That's cool.
You can call people sane or insane, but you don't MAKE THAT TRUE OR FALSE either.
You know, you're just wagging your mouth almost at random.
So, you're no threat to anybody because you don't show up with any data or information, just pissy griping.
Stuff it. Quoting: UNtypical USer
Indeed, my saying so does not make it true, however your behavior does.
Shoot yourself in the foot much, Emily?
Oh yes, I thought you were ignoring me. Guess not, as I predicted.
non sufficit Orbis
Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.
"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"
Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill |
| UNtypical USer
User ID: 742063
United States
8/29/2009 8:07 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
My behavior involves bringing ACTUAL DATA HERE for people to view for themselves.
You have no such responsible action to your credit. You're just jacking off with your mouth.
So, I'm not worried about my behavior. I'm doing what I say I'm doing.
My words and my activities coincide. Yours don't.
I'm getting some Moon images lined up to view next.
Last Edited by UNtypical USer on 8/29/2009 at 8:07 PM
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
United States
8/29/2009 8:09 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
My behavior involves bringing ACTUAL DATA HERE for people to view for themselves.
You have no such responsible action to your credit. You're just jacking off with your mouth.
So, I'm not worried about my behavior. I'm doing what I say I'm doing.
My words and my activities coincide. Yours don't.
I'm getting some Moon images lined up to view next. Quoting: UNtypical USer
So far all you have done is make unsupported claims, and then running away when you are challenged. But that is your pathology, no?
non sufficit Orbis
Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.
"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"
Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill |
| 341923
User ID: 753072
United States
8/29/2009 10:12 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
I'm not going to post to this particular thread anymore because the insults being thrown back and forth are simply not accomplishing anything. As far as the likelyhood of extraterrestrial life, the most intelligent people on this planet are convinced of it beyond any doubt.So it is a bit confusing to me why there are so many people riduculing an individual who believes this, though their search for it may be in earnest.
My own observations and theories about the moon have been ridiculed in a similar fashion, and my approach was scientific and based purely on empiracal evidence. It certainly makes one wonder if there is extraterrestrial life on the Moon and these people are covering it up. Quoting: IDW 758901
I have no problems with the idea of extraterrestrial life. I do have a problem with people badly manipulating photos and then applying their overactive imagination to see life in every photo of the Moon or Mars they get ahold of and then determining that the size of the Moon must be wrong because of their bad habits.
Just when you think batshit crazy can't get any crazier Emily
goes and ups the ante. |
| 341923
User ID: 753072
United States
8/29/2009 10:13 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Where? I honestly don't see anything. Does anybody else?
Just when you think batshit crazy can't get any crazier Emily
goes and ups the ante. |
| 341923
User ID: 753072
United States
8/29/2009 10:15 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Well, get used to my not caring about your debunking.
It occurs wherever lousy NASA photos get circulated so the real content can be viewed.
Weren't those last TWO just awe-inspiring Mars war photos?
If you weren't here griping, people would think nothing was happening here.
: ) Tally ho! Quoting: UNtypical USer
(response to bold) Is that what they were supposed to be?
Serious question again: Does the word apophenia mean anything to you?
Just when you think batshit crazy can't get any crazier Emily
goes and ups the ante. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
United States
8/29/2009 11:35 PM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Well, get used to my not caring about your debunking.
It occurs wherever lousy NASA photos get circulated so the real content can be viewed.
Weren't those last TWO just awe-inspiring Mars war photos?
If you weren't here griping, people would think nothing was happening here.
: ) Tally ho!
(response to bold) Is that what they were supposed to be?
Serious question again: Does the word apophenia mean anything to you? Quoting: 341923
Oh course it doesn't, Emily is essentially illiterate and certainly innumerate.
non sufficit Orbis
Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.
"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"
Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill |
| nomuse (NLI)
User ID: 754238
United States
8/30/2009 12:20 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Her posts, however, are innumerable. |
| UNtypical USer
User ID: 742063
United States
8/30/2009 12:27 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
All this whining is so silly; you guys, get a grip.
It's as if you have to keep advertising and advertising, because you haVe no case to work from.
I'm almost ready with the next segment; tomorrow I'll do it.
G'night you dreary cry-babies!
: )
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
United States
8/30/2009 12:52 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
All this whining is so silly; you guys, get a grip.
It's as if you have to keep advertising and advertising, because you haVe no case to work from.
I'm almost ready with the next segment; tomorrow I'll do it.
G'night you dreary cry-babies!
: ) Quoting: UNtypical USer
Project much, Emily? Sure you do, your shrink told you that years ago yet you don't listen, another sign of your pathology.
non sufficit Orbis
Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.
"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"
Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill |
| UNtypical USer
User ID: 742063
United States
8/30/2009 1:47 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Okay, here we go. How much does NASA know about the Moon?
[link to www.holyconservancy.org]
Here are four copies of prints of the Full Moon: 1) Hubble 2) NASA fly-by 3) Hanson print and 4) NASA also. They're all of the same general area, No. 2 slightly off center.
What you may notice in these four, is that the sparkly snow and ice or whatever it is changes location from photo to photo. That would imply seasons, wouldn't it?
Now, IF NASA KNOWS the Moon, they would have NOTICED SOME THINGS here on the front side of it, which bear speaking about.
1. Architecture with huge carved faces and artificial illumination.
[link to www.holyconservancy.org]
2. They would have noticed this pyramidal conservatory and the statues next to it (not to mention the human figures skittering around) Don't ask what the statues are doing; it's ART, remember?
[link to www.holyconservancy.org]
3. NASA would have noticed the Moon has varied surfaces, some of which support vegetation.
[link to www.holyconservancy.org]
My question is this: Why aren't these features LISTED (since they're so OBVIOUS in all four of these Official Photos) in the Moon Page of NASA?
[link to lro.gsfc.nasa.gov]
I await your replies.
: )
Last Edited by UNtypical USer on 8/30/2009 at 1:56 AM
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| IDW
User ID: 759311
United States
8/30/2009 2:04 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Okay, here we go. How much does NASA know about the Moon?
[ link to www.holyconservancy.org]
Here are four copies of prints of the Full Moon: 1) Hubble 2) NASA fly-by 3) Hanson print and 4) NASA also. They're all of the same general area, No. 2 slightly off center.
What you may notice in these four, is that the sparkly snow and ice or whatever it is changes location from photo to photo. That would imply seasons, wouldn't it?
Now, IF NASA KNOWS the Moon, they would have NOTICED SOME THINGS here on the front side of it, which bear speaking about.
1. Architecture with huge carved faces and artificial illumination.
[ link to www.holyconservancy.org]
2. They would have noticed this pyramidal conservatory and the statues next to it (not to mention the human figures skittering around) Don't ask what the statues are doing; it's ART, remember?
[ link to www.holyconservancy.org]
3. NASA would have noticed the Moon has varied surfaces, some of which support vegetation.
[ link to www.holyconservancy.org]
My question is this: Why aren't these features LISTED (since they're so OBVIOUS in all four of these Official Photos) in the Moon Page of NASA?
[ link to lro.gsfc.nasa.gov]
I await your replies.
: )
I have not been able to access any of your photos, it comes up page not found. I have seen this before, I am wondering what it is you are presenting that is pissing them off so bad that they attack you so vehemently and do not allow your information to be presented. BTW, here is what appears when you type in the address of my own theory of electromagnetic energy. It doesn;t appear when you access any other thread on the forum, either:
AOL Safety Alert: Potentially Harmful Site
[link to forum.physorg.com]
Hi! Just so you know, the website you are attempting to visit could potentially be harmful to your PC, your identity, or represent an otherwise dangerous threat to your online activity.
For your protection, we advise that you avoid this site. However, if you would like to proceed simply click here and good luck. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
United States
8/30/2009 2:10 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Okay, here we go. How much does NASA know about the Moon? Quoting: UNtypical USer
More than you, thats for sure.
Why is it that no one else can see your delusional sights? Oh thats right, they are a manifestation of your disease.
Last Edited by The Commentator on 8/30/2009 at 2:16 AM
non sufficit Orbis
Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.
"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"
Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill |
| IDW
User ID: 759311
United States
8/30/2009 2:28 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Okay, here we go. How much does NASA know about the Moon?
More than you, thats for sure.
Why is it that no one else can see your delusional sights? Oh thats right, they are a manifestation of your disease. Quoting: The Commentator
Based upon what I have seen whatever they know isn't very much. As for the photographs not being accessable, it makes me highly suspicious as to why. Apparently some of NASA's representatives here are able to view them, nut I am not. I am quite aware of how information is controlled and blocked on the internet, I am a seasoned veteran here, bud
So what gives? If Untypical is really a nutcase and there's nothing but delusions in her photographs, why can't I see them? And why the anger? I know I'm not full of crap or crazy, and I get treated pretty much the same way...see my point? |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
United States
8/30/2009 2:35 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Okay, here we go. How much does NASA know about the Moon?
More than you, thats for sure.
Why is it that no one else can see your delusional sights? Oh thats right, they are a manifestation of your disease.
Based upon what I have seen whatever they know isn't very much. As for the photographs not being accessable, it makes me highly suspicious as to why. Apparently some of NASA's representatives here are able to view them, nut I am not. I am quite aware of how information is controlled and blocked on the internet, I am a seasoned veteran here, bud
So what gives? If Untypical is really a nutcase and there's nothing but delusions in her photographs, why can't I see them? And why the anger? I know I'm not full of crap or crazy, and I get treated pretty much the same way...see my point? Quoting: IDW 759311
Why the fuck don't you ask Emily? I have no idea why you can't see them.
non sufficit Orbis
Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.
"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"
Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill |
| IDW
User ID: 759311
United States
8/30/2009 2:36 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Project much, Emily? Sure you do, your shrink told you that years ago yet you don't listen, another sign of your pathology. Quoting: The Commentator
Assuming 'Emily' is crazy, what you are doing here could be construed as not only cruel but a sign of mental illness in yourself. Bullying or antagonizing someone with a mental illness is just plain sick in the head. |
| IDW
User ID: 759311
United States
8/30/2009 2:40 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Why the fuck don't you ask Emily? I have no idea why you can't see them. Quoting: The Commentator
If you want to play that type of game and speak in that fashion to me, then be aware the gloves are off. It is readily apparent that some of NASA's representatives were viewing the photographs earlier in this thread. As for your disrespectful tone, kiss my hairy ass fucktard |
| IDW
User ID: 759311
United States
8/30/2009 2:44 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
what I want to know is how reading a theory about electromagnetic energy on a science forum could be 'dangerous'.
I don't think it's dangerous to anything but the 'establishment' and it's twisted rendition of reality. |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
United States
8/30/2009 3:01 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Why the fuck don't you ask Emily? I have no idea why you can't see them.
If you want to play that type of game and speak in that fashion to me, then be aware the gloves are off. It is readily apparent that some of NASA's representatives were viewing the photographs earlier in this thread. As for your disrespectful tone, kiss my hairy ass fucktard Quoting: IDW 759311
You didn't answer why you didn't ask Emily why you can't see her bogus images. This is telling.
Now, blow me, you beady eyed baboon fucker.
non sufficit Orbis
Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.
"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"
Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill |
| The Commentator
User ID: 587619
United States
8/30/2009 3:06 AM
| | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Project much, Emily? Sure you do, your shrink told you that years ago yet you don't listen, another sign of your pathology.
Assuming 'Emily' is crazy, what you are doing here could be construed as not only cruel but a sign of mental illness in yourself. Bullying or antagonizing someone with a mental illness is just plain sick in the head. Quoting: IDW 759311
You would be an expert on "sick in the head," no doubt from personal experience.
If you want to support Emily so much why don't you try answering the questions she has been asked that are too tough for her febble brain to answer?
Didn't think you were up to the task, no big surprise.
non sufficit Orbis
Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.
"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"
Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill |
| nomuse(NLI)
User ID: 754238
United States
8/30/2009 3:54 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
I have a pretty good idea why IDW can't access the pictures. But he's not going to believe it so there's no use even saying it. |
| IDW
User ID: 759477
United States
8/30/2009 8:49 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
I have a pretty good idea why IDW can't access the pictures. But he's not going to believe it so there's no use even saying it. Quoting: nomuse(NLI) 754238
I don't have any problems accessing the NASA photographs she posted links to on their website, it's only this Holyconservatory link that comes up 'page not found'. Having experienced similar problems before with similar material, I have to assume it means someone doesn't wish for me and probably others to view the photos for whatever reason, So yeah, tell me why you think it is, I will believe you if it checks out, I'm not shallow minded . Just don't try to tell me I am too stupid to click on a link or use a search engine, Nothing comes up for 'holyconservatory', but obviously NASA's representatives were relating that they had viewed the photos earlier and didnt see anything in them. Were they lying, and is the Holyconservatory just a delusion? And given the angry and damned right vicious attacks on what is allegedly a mentally ill person, one can assume the motivations are not of a pure nature.
Nomuse, I would like for you to comment on why an idea like the one I posted a link to above would have a warning attached to it claiming it might be dangerous for the person attempting to access it to attempt to do so.
Doesnt it just seem like they dont want anyone to read it, and are trying to scare them off? The interent opened up new oprotunities for people to relate their ideas to others without going through the academic peer review process which we all know is tainted by money, What gives, Nomuse?
Who are my ideas dangerous to, and why? |
| IDW
User ID: 759477
United States
8/30/2009 8:57 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Assuming 'Emily' is crazy, what you are doing here could be construed as not only cruel but a sign of mental illness in yourself. Bullying or antagonizing someone with a mental illness is just plain sick in the head. Quoting: IDW
You would be an expert on "sick in the head," no doubt from personal experience. Quoting: The Commentator
Not an expert, but yeah, I've had experience with people like you before many times. It started on the playground in gradeschool, where I saw bullies and tormentors pick on the weak .You're obviously a person who has serious mental issues, and it ismt to hard to recognize..
If you want to support Emily so much why don't you try answering the questions she has been asked that are too tough for her febble brain to answer? Quoting: The Commentator
I have expressed my opinion to her and everyone else here that I believe her methods are fundamentally flawed, but I did so in a polite manner because I saw no need to be otherwise. Why do you?
Didn't think you were up to the task, no big surprise. Quoting: The Commentator
Well, no, I'm not an expert on digital phtography, I never claimed to be. But I do know enough to realize it is useless as evidence. |
| IDW
User ID: 759477
United States
8/30/2009 9:12 AM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
You didn't answer why you didn't ask Emily why you can't see her bogus images. This is telling. Quoting: The Commentator
I seriously doubt if whe knows. I asked for any explaination, from anyone who might know. I think I already do know why.
Now, blow me, you beady eyed baboon fucker. Quoting: The Commentator
AWE, I'm crushed. Is this the best insulting, demeaning comment you can come up with? Beady eyed baboon fucker? Blow me? You sound like a 12 year old with a case of Tourettes syndrome and homosexual tendencies. Now I am a person who doesnt discourage or dispise homos, I think it's natures way of limitting overpopulation, but no thanks, I'm not your type. |
| UNtypical USer
User ID: 742063
United States
8/30/2009 12:11 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Okay, here we go. How much does NASA know about the Moon?
[ link to www.holyconservancy.org]
Here are four copies of prints of the Full Moon: 1) Hubble 2) NASA fly-by 3) Hanson print and 4) NASA also. They're all of the same general area, No. 2 slightly off center.
What you may notice in these four, is that the sparkly snow and ice or whatever it is changes location from photo to photo. That would imply seasons, wouldn't it?
Now, IF NASA KNOWS the Moon, they would have NOTICED SOME THINGS here on the front side of it, which bear speaking about.
1. Architecture with huge carved faces and artificial illumination.
[ link to www.holyconservancy.org]
2. They would have noticed this pyramidal conservatory and the statues next to it (not to mention the human figures skittering around) Don't ask what the statues are doing; it's ART, remember?
[ link to www.holyconservancy.org]
3. NASA would have noticed the Moon has varied surfaces, some of which support vegetation.
[ link to www.holyconservancy.org]
My question is this: Why aren't these features LISTED (since they're so OBVIOUS in all four of these Official Photos) in the Moon Page of NASA?
[ link to lro.gsfc.nasa.gov]
I await your replies.
: )
I have not been able to access any of your photos, it comes up page not found. I have seen this before, I am wondering what it is you are presenting that is pissing them off so bad that they attack you so vehemently and do not allow your information to be presented. BTW, here is what appears when you type in the address of my own theory of electromagnetic energy. It doesn;t appear when you access any other thread on the forum, either:
AOL Safety Alert: Potentially Harmful Site
[ link to forum.physorg.com]
Hi! Just so you know, the website you are attempting to visit could potentially be harmful to your PC, your identity, or represent an otherwise dangerous threat to your online activity.
For your protection, we advise that you avoid this site. However, if you would like to proceed simply click here and good luck.
Fascinating!
So that's how they're doing it!
Try another route. I'll call AOL, since I'm a customer of theirs, and complain.
AOL is not only censoring my site; they are claiming they don't know who I am even though I pay a monthly fee for their services.
Only half the system recognizes me.
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| UNtypical USer
User ID: 742063
United States
8/30/2009 12:14 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
THIS IS A TRICK.
AOL Safety Alert: Potentially Harmful Site
[ link to forum.physorg.com]
Hi! Just so you know, the website you are attempting to visit could potentially be harmful to your PC, your identity, or represent an otherwise dangerous threat to your online activity.
For your protection, we advise that you avoid this site. However, if you would like to proceed simply click here and good luck.
[link to www.physforum.com]
> Electo-mechanical Theory Of Electromagnetic Energy, Personal Theory, Fell free to disqualify
THIS IS NOT THE SAME AS AOL.
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| IDW
User ID: 759477
United States
8/30/2009 12:25 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
I can't help but wonder why the NASA moonbats have completely abandoned these threads since I brought up the censorship of my electromagnetic theory.
Somehow it scared 'em off or they were told to back off and shut up. Only one has replied since, and didn't comment, he just called me a beady eyed Baboon fucker and not much else. I recognize this particular person's mental disorder and I believe I know who he is. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 757200
United States
8/30/2009 12:26 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
I can't help but wonder why the NASA moonbats have completely abandoned these threads since I brought up the censorship of my electromagnetic theory.
Somehow it scared 'em off or they were told to back off and shut up. Only one has replied since, and didn't comment, he just called me a beady eyed Baboon fucker and not much else. I recognize this particular person's mental disorder and I believe I know who he is. Quoting: IDW 759477
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com] |
| IDW
User ID: 759477
United States
8/30/2009 12:32 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
Untypical, click on the link I posted and add it to your favorites, then click on it in your list of AOL favorites.
I noticed that when I copy and paste the address manually ir click on the link here in the forum, no such warning comes up, only when I click on it in my favorites. It is also odd that there were hundreds of replies on the phsycs thread that have disappeared, and if you go to the forum you cannot find the thread at all. I believe it may be in a Google cache and no longer on the forum at all. |
| UNtypical USer
User ID: 742063
United States
8/30/2009 12:34 PM | | Re: NASA DUMB or NASA FRAUD? | Quote |
This is AMAZING! You have to REGISTER your "server" WITH AOL, or they provide this "security notice" TO EVERYONE.
We are doing the TOTALITARIAN TIP TOE!
Okay, the tech supervisor says, if you want to make sure you can get to this site or that site, be sure to add the site to your Security Settings as a Safe Site.
He corroborated that my sites ARE SAFE in terms of content and intent; so there ought to be no problem with Security settings.
Now, to return to the photos. They show HUGE anomalous structures that NASA has never described, nor pointed to, nor acknowledged.
Further, when you look at the SCALE of these structures, you realize--and it's OBVIOUS--that the Moon CANNOT BE 2000 MILES IN DIAMETER nor can it be 238,000 miles away.
Last Edited by UNtypical USer on 8/30/2009 at 12:50 PM
(>#( >7( >~SheChaiYAH -- JUST A PROGRAMMED MEAT-SUIT? BANNED for DATA @ ATS, BBC, AstroVera, Open Minds & Military.com. Don't take bans personal. |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 | |
|
