Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

Chaol,

Would it be better if the possibility for all of our symbols regarding the shared $50MM was not a space but was a different type of possibility such as trust or happiness (emotion)....hope?


A possibility that each of us can share more easily.




Also if overlooked,

website idea can be found at:
[link to www.indiegogo.com]

The "I'd like to allow my wife (a devout atheist) and family(christian based apatheists) to remain relevant." part may be quite difficult, unless of course you're willing to change an entire world (this one) to bring them closer to your new one.

Or you can find a way to do it in ways that are relevant to them. Making it a game, for example.

Yes, that would work.

No need to define the spaces beforehand. Just be sure to create a new symbol should you change the space that it interacts in.

Thanks Chaol! A quick question: Interaction is the most important element, yet is also entirely neutral?

This occurred to me, too. I thought of how companies will have pens made up with their logo on it and give them away. Then that pen is disbursed to many places, interacting in many ways in many spaces. The only thing I was unsure of was the ongoing Structure around it. Nonetheless, we can see examples of successful "branding" everywhere. This may be different from the Genius, but mentioning it any way...

---
was *choco-mint
will now be:

---
***

You can try it but I don't think it is likely to work because it must be measured.

Otherwise, you'll end up with:

Symbol = measured when creating, through process of manifestation
Interaction = measureable
Logic = measure
Potential Energy = unmeasured

The space can be mental. But it must be defined.

If you can measure trust and happiness it may work. But then it would be more complicated than using an other type of space (like a room in a dream version of the Eiffel Tower).

My Wife and Family, as I perceive them "here" are already recurring characters in my outer-realm experience. Similar to the way the cast followed Dorothy to Oz(a realm she experienced in a spontaneous oob). Repeating patterns of relevancy seen through a kaleidoscope of perspective.

(thanks again Chaol)

Last Edited by MutantMessiah on 11/10/2012 01:00 PM

Yes. There are no 'good' or 'bad' interactions.

The symbol should be neutral (as free of pre-extant value as you think possible)

Potential Energy is inherently neutral.

Logic is neutral because it does not matter what it is.

And Interactions are neutral because there's only the objective values created in relationships. (How these are perceived depends on perspective.)

Nice insight.

There is no where the Genius is not used.

Everything that exists is one of the four elements and "follows" the same steps that we here illustrate.

What if a non-profit consciousness research group is legally formed? Then is it logical?

Chaol, this'll be my last one for today. :)

Given your reply above (and all times prior) as to what symbols 'are' and 'are not' supposed to represent....would it not be better to just continually be creating symbols and the subsequent Genius Relationary steps without regard to any thing in particular. This way, someone like Gespenst, who can't consciously pin down any physical desires, can just start making symbols and steps and haphazardly (sub-consciously) fall into the exact thing he wanted without being aware of it before hand.

??? does my question make sense

Thanks again, Chaol. You're aces!

So I would create a new symbol for the bank, and a new symbol for the grocery store, etc:? And do I need to use the same symbol each time I go to the bank and each time I go to the grocery?

And could these symbols be created each day or do they need to be created at one time before starting interaction?

Last Edited by U3 on 11/10/2012 01:21 PM

If the intention was to enrich participants by USD $50 million, I don't see how it would make sense in different perspectives.

Care to illustrate how?

Yes, it makes sense. And it can be done.

The difficult part, though, is determining what the symbol is (loosely) for so that it could be discarded or interactions enhanced if need be.

Eventually, though, I'm hoping some of us will get to the point of creating the symbols on-the-fly (mentally) so this could be a logical path to there.

If your space used (Possibility) is the bank then the symbol would be different than that used for the grocery store.

If the symbol is something you take with you then just keep in mind that it needs a defined space with which to process interactions. (It could be a bag, for example.)

No need to create a new symbol each day. They can be created at any time in past/present/future.

Last Edited by Chaol on 11/10/2012 01:33 PM

I have asked the group to work with me. My symbol for earning >$5M per year for 10 years on the PGA Tour is a red arrow with an X for a tail. We are mentally placing it on the first tee box of golf courses so it can interact with all of the golfers that play the courses.

I must have misunderstood before when you made comments that the symbol was to be free of extant representation. For instance, when I asked whether it was better for my symbol to represent my new position, or the paperwork associated with the new position, I understood you to say that it should be free of any 'meaning'. Meaning that I should not have associated anything about any thing of the "position" or any part there in and just make a symbol (with the subsequent steps) and let my subconscious fill in the rest.

So now, I take it to mean that the symbol should be free of any conscious relation, but that it should have some semblance of what we were "intending" with the creation of the symbol (and steps) in the first place?

So that would mean that I shouldn't just start creating symbols (and steps) willy-nilly without having any semblance of what I was intending for each symbol to bring about [in my perception] in the first place?

Again, thanks so much for your input. THIS is really my last one I'll bother you with today.

May I ask, what does the arrow or 'X' represent?

... by all means, create symbols willy-nilly.

But keep to the steps we've pointed out here.

No need for semblance. It's better for there not to be. Your sub-conscious will take care of it. (No need to force the semblance, as it will just confuse things.)

By the way. I'm not at all bothered by your questions :)

Because $150 million USD is needed for the land, buildings, equipment and salaries. And each participant is a share-holder.

Last Edited by U3 on 11/10/2012 03:41 PM

Aha!

1) So once we determine what the symbol is for, we can make the symbols mentally?

2) And the symbols can change as we progress?

3) So what the symbol is for, is permanent?

4)The symbol is changeable?

5) And how are interactions enhanced? (by changing the symbol?)

Defined space means deciding the space before using the symbol?

The last statement I find very exciting. TY.

You've now got one in a popular course in N Wales :)

Nothing in particular. It's just a symbol that came to mind. I wrapped it in red electrical tape. When i visualized myself going to the teebox it was the object that appeared in my hand so i placed it down. Now i have and mentally placed it on numerous tee boxes.

I'm curious to see how it works.

Last Edited by Chaol on 11/10/2012 03:22 PM

Then an other route may likely be found (by your sub-conscious) that uses less energy. The money could come from other sources, for example. (It also assumes that everyone would give all or most of the money to the research facility.)

The idea is to make it so that the only logical way to get to your destination is to take a route that your intention is on.

Imagine you're Bill Gates and it's the 1980s. You have only 1 wish. Do you:

1) Wish that Microsoft become the biggest software company in the world, or

2) create a plan for you to perceive your software being installed on PC after PC?

perhaps his Genius model would be like the following...

Symbol = create Windows
Potential Energy = Computer hard drives
Interaction = people interfacing with Windows
Logic = whenever someone purchases a copy of Windows I will input 1 additional value of pi into my spreadsheet

So in this example, the destination is reached by defining the route.

And as the space for interaction expands in perspective (the size of hard drives) so do the interactions with the software.

The problem with #1 is that you have not symbolized your intentions to your sub-conscious, so it does not know what you want to perceive. Your sub-conscious does not speak English. It communicates metaphorically and, thus, creates your reality through symbology.

Thank you very much marshwiggle

Thank you very much marshwiggle

Thank you very much marshwiggle

What is something that only PGA tour winners experience?