Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

How long would we have if the note was a calculation based on the speed of the expansion of the universe a a 5 of light speed and the note is from somebody in another universe coming at us at a speed that is,
a) slight slower than light speed so we get a 3 hour window to prevent a collision.

b) slightly faster than the speed of light so we get the news 3 hours after the collision has already taken place.

How would the notes differ?

In my dream last night I knew exactly how to assign value to things to make it useful to my experience. When I woke up I could not remember how I did it.

But how would you acquire "knowledge" into your new library/language? again I struggle to explain what I'm trying to get across here with words.

When we create our new language or in EC if you made a neuronicon for "a book of this worlds true history" how would you access it?

Or even a neuronicon for "a full length feature visualization with full control to perceive this worlds true history"

A book wouldn't be as fun for comparison.

Inside the Sphinx's library I have seen others reports of books and "movie" things.

The act of perception is creation itself.

To understand how you create perception look back at the airplane picture on the ecsys website. Now let's substitute today's events to make things more clear. When you have all of the props (the school, ambulances, police, SWAT team, a story about a shooter) and actors (grieving parents, grieving teachers, news media, other students) you don't actually need any harmed children. That part of the story is like the airplane. You will never see any real evidence that any children were actually harmed, because they were not harmed, it's not necessary because the other relationships tell you it must be real.

You're real, I'm real, Chaol is real...I bet every poster on this thread would say they are real.

Hi.

Death, to the few who really subscribe to X in my world, is more of a myth. It seems real when you see or know of others 'tune out' but we also know that the experience of it is different from what it appears to be.

We're sad to see people go, of course. And in a way it's the end of that person's life (or relevance in the world) so they are missed.

Anyone remember Chaol saying we'd probably not be using the internet by last december?

I found it and also rememberd another question I have. If Choal creates his perspective, why does he need a nexus point to travel back and forth between worlds? There is something I'm no understanding (or Chaol isn't) about our perception creating powers.

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. (Page 218)

How is there perspective without consciousness?

Yes. And in late October of that year, SOPA was introduced.

This website was one of many on 'the list' to be taken offline.

Some changes have been made since then and now your internet is safe and sound.

Can you define consciousness?

In truth, Chaol sometimes contradicts himself :)

The nexus point is a value in my perspective ;)

His dates have been off before. He will be back soon now and answer these questions, heh!!!!

I don't think he's ever described himself as an alien lol!

What I meant was he says 'we are not human' then he says his girlfriend knows him to be human.
Confusing!

I thought I'd better start over reading Chaol's posts and look what I just found:

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.

Everything truly exists. Like I mention above, When something cannot be fully perceived, it appears infinite.

Our language also enables us to perceive these alternate realities, if we want. One alterate realm is this one.

You exist in multiple realms now, at every moment. You could traverse hundreds of thousands of different possibilities in one day without knowing it.

So most of those bold statements are my understanding (before I met Chaol) of myself as spirit.

Edit: Found a contradiction:

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. (Page 2)

"The answers" in the universe apply to everyone, not just an infinitesimally small percentage of the population.

We look to scientists for these answers because they're doing things that we don't understand. It is no different than how (in the past) we look to the religious elite for the answers.

But the answers are not found in science or religion or any one particular aspect of the schools and politics that we have created.

The answers are universal and have more to do with consciousness and perception.

I think Chaol believes in universal law.


And this poster asked Chaol how could there not be consciousness....Chaol asked him what consciousness is to him. Here are both their answers:

Thread: Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking. (Page 2)

Intentionally misleading.

As I mentioned, I will at times manipulate for my own purposes of bringing your world closer to my own.

An example of this would be if I told you that Auntie Sally was coming on June 3rd.

I know that Auntie Sally won't arrive until mid-September but you would not understand how the preparations you usually make for Auntie Sally are needed on June 3rd even if she is not coming.

If you knew that she was not coming then you would not prepare the biscuits.

If I told you who was coming instead of Auntie Sally you would ask questions well beyond June 3rd, and we'd never get anywhere.

It is not that I want to hide something but sometimes things are exceedingly difficult to make sense of.

So Auntie Sally is arriving June 3rd. Do you need help with the chaos biscuits?

The website is meant as an introduction to this particular forum.

The language I use is specific for the intent. For the website, it is to use language and terms that people are more likely to understand.

As we move along in our understanding I will change the language and terms so that new (or as I say, more accurate) understandings come into play.

From the website there is one law (although I would not really call it a law), Ecsys Prime.

If you read it is it being written?

Or are you just reading it.

[snips]

Do you feel Chaol has complete control of all of his perspectives?
[snips]

Chaos for Christmas! Merry Necsys! :)

I'm barely scratching the surface, so to speak.

As I've explained it earlier it would be as if you took a trip to an other planet and explained your world's monetary system.

Some people may be generally fascinated with such a system (should they have only vague concepts of exchanged value in their world) but for me it's just normal. I'm not "an economist" but rather someone quite normal in my world who happens to use "money".

Others may despise the idea (rightfully so).

Instead of calling them dollars maybe you will call them units to suit local tastes. You adopt your explanation to make it a bit easier to understand.

I can explain some things about it and know a little bit about "derivatives" and other instruments but I'm by no means an expert.

Right now we've just gotten off of counting (1, 2, 3...) and the nature of buying and selling (the Genius) and are moving to more advanced topics such as interest (some of what we're getting into on the past couple of pages).

Although I must say we have enough material for the next 50 years. There is so much left to explain :)

Is it sennight sickness, Chaol?

Are we any closer to your world yet?

Glad you're here. We miss you when you're gone.

Okay, I couldn't resist. I know I said I posted the last one for the night, but I can't help myself.

Chaol blew my mind with this post.........and what followed after is hilarious. They tried to figure out the code. I'm too tired to stay up to see if Chaol ever explained it. I'll be back on it tomorrow, LOL!!!

Ok I have a question for all of you then. Why are humans so pathetic? Why are they always willing to trade freedom for a false sense of safety? Emotion trumps logic every time.

There is enough 'unique' material here that I no longer have a problem finding the exact spot from which I left.

But, yes, that was interesting.

(The code has no meaning. It's just a marker.)

Intentionally misleading.

As I mentioned, I will at times manipulate for my own purposes of bringing your world closer to my own.

An example of this would be if I told you that Auntie Sally was coming on June 3rd.

I know that Auntie Sally won't arrive until mid-September but you would not understand how the preparations you usually make for Auntie Sally are needed on June 3rd even if she is not coming.

If you knew that she was not coming then you would not prepare the biscuits.

If I told you who was coming instead of Auntie Sally you would ask questions well beyond June 3rd, and we'd never get anywhere.

It is not that I want to hide something but sometimes things are exceedingly difficult to make sense of.

So Auntie Sally is arriving June 3rd. Do you need help with the chaos biscuits?

There's not much difference between emotions and logic.

Emotions, like chaos, are a logic that we do not yet consciously understand.

The key is interaction rather than freedom or safety.

We must all ways find new ways to interact. And sometimes the new ways seem to suck.