REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Notes from an "alternate universe". Introduction to a new way of thinking.
Quoting: DODEC 20177375 Quoting: Chaol
Thought: Have proof of transaction that shows I transferred USD 450MM to 9 separate accounts, each receiving USD 50MM. Quoting: dodec 20177375
Direct Symbol: Breakage Crowdfunding Page
Space: Indiegogo website
Interaction: People interfacing with crowd-funding page
Logic: Whenever someone makes a donation of less than $250 USD, I will generate a "buzz" noise
Whenever someone donates $500 USD or more I will generate a clap.
Whenever someone comments on the page I will add a "." to a Word document.
Indirect Symbol: iooooy
Your Logic element is free to roam, however don't forget that it's purpose is to solidity what your symbol represents in your perspective
. This is done by building rules and guidelines around your representation.
You could use other logic, for example, but creating the Logic for your Symbol is more effective.
Chaol before you depart,
would the logic be best then if it was made to be what is most logical to reach my goal and bring it into my perspective. For example, If the idea is ever going to generate 500MM then I am going to need to raise a lot of money to build a great website that can handle that kind of user traffic.
Then would it be best to have logic items such as:
clap every time someone clicks the donate 10,000 USD button on my symbol page
add a "#" sign to a word document every time my symbol page receives 50,000 new views?
is having this map limiting the ways I can get 500MM, or is it fine if it is the most relevant way to get there?
You're the best,
Yes, you seem to be unnecessarily limiting your possibilities by assuming, "...then I am going to need to raise a lot of money to build a great website that can handle that kind of user traffic."
among other things.
What would your Genius model be without assumptions?
Please verify you're human:
Reason for reporting: